Jump to content


13dangledangle's Photo

13dangledangle

Member Since 22 Jun 2009
Offline Last Active Today, 12:48 AM
***--

#2228249 Yay @ Howard

Posted by Guest on 20 November 2011 - 11:08 PM

Another brilliant game.


#2227956 South Park Themed GDT on HFBoards

Posted by DyingAlive on 20 November 2011 - 07:10 PM

I happened to be checking out the HFBoards Sharks vs Avs GDT to for fantasy purposes and I found this:

http://hfboards.com/...d.php?t=1034285


Absolutely awesome GDT and is pretty damn funny. Just thought I'd share it so other people could enjoy it as well.


#2227869 11/20 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Ducks 2

Posted by frwtv on 20 November 2011 - 12:15 PM

I will be streaming this game at http://freeredwings.tv


#2227861 11/20 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Ducks 2

Posted by Hockeytown0001 on 20 November 2011 - 11:14 AM

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Last DET-ANA matchup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKuPaG-HNVs

Posted Image

Posted Image

Next Game
Posted Imagevs.Posted Image




#2227394 Share of Leafs for sale

Posted by cusimano_brothers on 19 November 2011 - 03:17 PM

Posted Image


#2227259 11/19 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Kings 1

Posted by Hockeytown0001 on 18 November 2011 - 10:54 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Tonight's Stream-Opposition GDT
Official Game Preview

Posted Image
Posted Image

Last DET-LA matchup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3-h78y9HKQ&feature=fvst

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Next Game
Posted Imagevs.Posted Image




#2226338 11/17 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Sharks 5

Posted by Hockeytown0001 on 17 November 2011 - 12:48 AM

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image


GDT will be updated soon.

Or maybe I'll just leave it like this for a little bit, judging by last night's effort in St. Louis.


#2225351 The 2012 Off-Season

Posted by Guest on 14 November 2011 - 04:09 PM

MacDonald is not an NHL-caliber goalie.


#2225308 The 2012 Off-Season

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 14 November 2011 - 11:31 AM

Hudler - Datsyuk - Iginla
Franzen - Zetterberg - Brunnstrom
Abdelkader - Helm - Cleary
Mursak - Nyqist - Brashear


Lidstrom - Suter
Kronwall - White
Erskine - Kindl


#2225425 11/15 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blues 2

Posted by Hockeytown0001 on 15 November 2011 - 12:22 AM

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Tonight's Stream-Opposition GDT
Official Game Preview

Posted Image
Posted Image

Last DET-STL matchup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn8D7Ac04Kw

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Next Game
Posted Imagevs.Posted Image




#2225422 Ryan Miller's opinion on Milan Lucic

Posted by Buppy on 14 November 2011 - 11:18 PM

To the bold, that's why it's a "charging" penalty. If it were anyone other than a goalie that's not even a penalty.

To the underlined, this is made up. You have no basis for concluding he wanted to injure Miller. Try and use this logic to prove someone's intent in a court and see how well that logic holds up. Also, to note, Miller did not just leave the game when the hit happened. He played another 26 minutes of ice time, surely was evaluated at the first intermission, and cleared to keep playing, until leaving after the 2nd. Lucic is not a weak hitter and if this guy wanted to injure Miller with a hit he would have certainly done plenty of damage. Miller's injuries came from the fall, not the hit -- somehow, he was capable enough to swing his stick at Lucic in response, and he's damn lucky he didn't connect or that would have got him a suspension.

It is not reasonable to just say someone had an intent to injure.. prove the intent. Hitting Miller is not proof of an intent to injure without making synonymous hitting someone with intending to injure. An intent t injure is not an intent to hit, it's an intent to injure someone. Seriously, it's hard to fathom what the difficulty in discerning the two is. The only proof here is that it's a charging penalty.

You realize there is a provision in the charging rule allowing for supplementary discipline, right? You keep saying it was a charging penalty as if that means it shouldn't have been a suspension.

You're right that you can't prove intent. However, you can infer intent by looking at the actions and the likely result. A hard hit on someone in a vulnerable position is reasonbly likely to cause injury, therefore it is reasonable to infer that intentionally hitting (hard) a vulnerable player is intent to injure.

Regardless of what you or others think of the rule, the fact is goalies are not fair game. That means we can reasonably assume Miller did not feel (and should not have had) any need to protect himself from a hit. In my opinion, because goalies have that protection and therefore do not expect to be hit like that, goalies should always be considered vulnerable. So in my opinion, any hard, intentional hit on a goalie should be considered intent to injure and warrant a suspension.

I understand that it is subjective and not everyone will subscribe to the same logic. However, remember that a lack of 'proof' of intent is not proof of no intent. Also remember that this is a hockey league, not a court of law. We're not talking about sending someone to jail. We don't need to meet so strict a burden of proof.

This was a chance for the league to prove they are willing to suspend a star player (besides Pronger) as well as deter future actions they obviously do not want to see in game (goalies getting hit). In my opnion, Shanny missed on this one.


#2225268 Swedish balls

Posted by sputman on 14 November 2011 - 07:44 AM

seven hells look at those ref jerseys.

:wacko:


#2224397 11/11 GDT: Oilers 0 at Red Wings 3

Posted by Hockeytown0001 on 11 November 2011 - 12:37 AM

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Tonight's Stream-Opposition GDT
Official Game Preview

Posted Image
Posted Image

Last DET-EDM matchup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLA49ZKCTE0

Posted Image
Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Imagea
Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Next Game
Posted Imagevs.Posted Image




#2224218 Philly v. Tampa

Posted by Guest on 09 November 2011 - 10:33 PM




#2223646 11/8 GDT: Avalanche 2 at Red Wings 5

Posted by P. Marlowe on 08 November 2011 - 09:24 AM

No Crapndl again? WTF kid is being benched in favor for 2 trash defenders.makes no sense.


Fixed.