He's not afraid to sit vets if they're not performing in a way he thinks they should be.
In my opinion, Cleary was playing like garbage at a time where he was featured on the top 2 lines (albeit while individuals were injured), and Babcock let him rot there. Could have called someone up, but, nahhhhh
Do you have a crystal ball? Are you a GM with a decade + knowledge or a coach who is regarded as one of the best in hockey? Oh.... I didn't think so. You just assume having Cleary on the team isn't the best for the team but to be honest no one can say really what is best. We can only take a guess.
There is no guessing here my friend. Yeah we not be a GM or a head coach, but we have two eyes, and we understand hockey.
You don't need a crystal ball to see that this guy does cannot skate, cannot shoot, etc., to the point that he makes us better.
Well this also can be good thing, hockey is the far superior sport and it doesn't need all the drama, over the top celebrations and endless player fiascos. The fanbase may be smaller but way more passionate, loyal and the athletes are the most down to earth guys in all of sports. Long story short other leagues may be bigger but quality beats quantity 100 out of 100 times. I mean giving a murder a contract would never happen in hockey because gangmembers and other troublemakers do not have a place in hockey. Hello Patriots... The Wings problem is simple: as fans we have been spoiled and since Mr. I has to spend money in order to supsidize teams that should not have a Nhl franchise, instead of trying to built another team like 2002 the interest in watching an only behind the pack team is going down. Personally I would prefer less teams and free spending
I think that is a great point. You could even take that a step further and suggest that a part of the reason that hockey is so disrespected is because NHL players don't make negative headlines.
Obviously, that is a very backwards statement. I hope I'm wrong, but if I'm not, what does that say about us as a society in general?
Again though, point the finger at ESPN who likes to talk about talk more than anything. They will take a controversial subject and beat it to death.
The consenus is that the Lions and Tigers are (much) higher on the food chain than the Wings.
I completely agree, but I hate it. What does it say about the state of Michigan where the majority of us support arguably the worst run franchise in sports with bumbling idiots running around and yet we take for granted arguably the best run franchise in sports.
Factors that I understand to be true:
Winning has made Michigan sports fans lethargic
ESPN tells people to love the NFL and pay no attention to the NHL, so people love the NFL and ignore the NHL
Unfortunately I can't make everyone think logically...