Jump to content


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

dirtydangles's Photo

dirtydangles

Member Since 23 Dec 2009
Offline Last Active Today, 12:17 PM
-----

#2267860 3/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Flyers 3

Posted by dirtydangles on 06 March 2012 - 09:54 PM

stupid first and 3rd goals to give up. ridiculous. we need clutch lidstrom back next game or we lose again.


#2267687 3/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Flyers 3

Posted by dirtydangles on 06 March 2012 - 09:10 PM

hopefully the wings can stay away from the physical game that philly wants to play in the third. they need to focus on scoring and let philly preoccupy themselves with payback. if philly runs around looking for retribution then they will be open defensively if the wings stay composed.


#2267673 3/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Flyers 3

Posted by dirtydangles on 06 March 2012 - 09:05 PM


kronwall clearly stays perpendicular to the ice and does not extend an arm or elbow. if voracek is not leaning forward he would have just been stood up and put on his bum.


#2267398 3/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Flyers 3

Posted by dirtydangles on 06 March 2012 - 07:55 PM

f*** macdonald


#2266133 Brendan Smith watch thread

Posted by dirtydangles on 03 March 2012 - 03:01 PM

It seems unlikely but if Lids came back for another season AND Holland somehow managed to sign Suter, the Wings defense would be ridiculous.

Lids, Suter, White, Kronner, Quincey, Smith, Ericsson, Kindl???

When Smith becomes a regular in the lineup, with his PP and ES time I'm guessing he'll be slotted above both E and Kindl.

I can't see the Wings ditching Ericsson, unless they somehow can get around his NTC.  Because I don't know why he'd want to play anywhere else than the Wings.  It'd be an overpayment but Ericsson over Kindl on the bottom pairing is stronger than Kindl.  Kindl becomes much more expendable with Smith and especially Quincey in the lineup.


If we could somehow lose Ericsson our D will have the potential to be a long term (affordable) unit with youth. Considering Jimmy, Kindl, Smith, and White need to be re-upped after next season it would be wise not to spend right up to the cap this offseason. If we pay big money for Suter I'd like to move Ericsson's contract as I don't see him garnering over 2mill more cap than Kindl for the play he brings. This leaves 40mill in cap space for forwards and signing Parise in around 7-7.5 mill with room to spare for raises next season for rookies.

CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR


DEFENSEMEN
Ryan Suter ($7.500m) / Kyle Quincey ($3.750m)
Niklas Kronwall ($4.750m) / Ian White ($2.875m)
Jakub Kindl ($0.883m) / Brendan Smith ($0.875m)
Doug Janik ($0.512m)

GOALTENDERS
Jimmy Howard ($2.250m)

CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $23,395,833; BONUSES: $0
CAP SPACE (8-man roster): $40,904,167


#2262453 new member here, question about Wings in St. Louis

Posted by dirtydangles on 25 February 2012 - 04:38 PM

Internet says Hemitage Hotel.  Yelp reviewer "confirms"
http://m.yelp.com/bi...hotel-nashville


not sure if this is correct but if so, why post it? i think this guy is honestly a wings fan but we see some "new" posters asking about this stuff sometimes and who knows, might be opposition fans that plan to pull the fire alarm there at 4 AM before game day....


#2262396 2012 NHL Trade Deadline Thread - February 27th, 3:00 PM ET

Posted by dirtydangles on 25 February 2012 - 01:36 PM

I would lose Hudler for Parise in a heart-beat.  And I wouldn't' want Hudler for 5 million, either.  But some people act like Hudler is worthless which is clearly not the case. Even if Zetterberg weren't having an off year Hudler would still be 3rd in scoring.  Nothing to sneeze at.  Until we get someone who is a bona-fide improvement over Hudler (Parise) we need to keep him.  Don't trade him for a bottom 6er is basically what I'm saying.

Agreed. Its amazing how undervalued he is. Hes got like 6 points less than nash at 5 mill less. People just knock him for his size but he has been winning battles all over the place this season.


#2262137 Dustin Brown being shopped around

Posted by dirtydangles on 24 February 2012 - 02:04 PM

Brown would be nice, but we would be reducing our chances of landing Parise/Suter if we commit money elsewhere.


#2261349 Carter to LA

Posted by dirtydangles on 23 February 2012 - 08:54 PM

f*** i wanted carter...


#2261160 2/23 GDT : Canucks 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

Posted by dirtydangles on 23 February 2012 - 07:28 PM

lets f*** em up boys. hard 60 min. score early and often.


#2260772 Red Wings still looking for another defensemen?

Posted by dirtydangles on 22 February 2012 - 07:32 PM

Man, who the hell knows what he is going to do now... Nothing he is doing is making any sense to me, and I have always been a huge proponent of Holland.  I trust him 100%, but this month is a complete mystery to me.

I dont think holland has it all figured out yet either. Too many variables this offseason. If lids is still on the fence and possible retirements from homer he has to be careful he doesnt lose too many players all at once. I think thats y bert was signed. Hudler could be gone who knows. Eaves' future is up in the air as well. Not to mention there are 29 other gmsf****** up plans all over the place.


#2260617 Bertuzzi Contract Extension

Posted by dirtydangles on 22 February 2012 - 12:24 PM

f***kkkkk noooooooo

Unless we move eaves and cleary we cant get suter and parise. Guessing lids is back.


#2258147 2/17 GDT : Predators 1 at Red Wings 2

Posted by dirtydangles on 17 February 2012 - 10:05 PM

anyone still want suter on this team? just kidding. that was an insane move by the best player in the game.


#2256583 Rick Nash "available for the right team/price"

Posted by dirtydangles on 14 February 2012 - 03:24 PM

The only big plus in trading Franzen for Nash, which seems the popular suggestion, is the 5 year age difference. But Detroit would also have to throw in a top prospect or two, and maybe even a top draft pick. Is that a wise trade? Franzen has 22 goals, Nash, 18.  Franzen is proven playoff performer, Nash has 1 goal in 4 games, which, yeah, is not necessarily his fault. I don't know?

I still don't understand why so many people are against Jeff Carter, who is younger, right-handed, has been a more prolific goal scorer over the last three seasons, and who could be had for half of what it would cost to acquire Nash. All because of "character" issues? Give me a break.

Nash is the better all-around player, yes, but Holland would have to work a miracle to get him, and you can say goodbye to Franzen or Filppula, along with Nyguist AND Smith. That's what I would ask for to give him to divisional rival if I were Scott Howson, especially with some of the offers that other teams might make. But Rangers fans are dreamin' if they think Nash can be had for Dubinsky, Kreider and a 1st rounder. Howson would lose his job.

Give 'em Tatar and 1st rounder for Carter, bolstering that second line, move Hudler to the 3rd line, hello Stanley Cup!


^THIS. I don't get why people are willing to sell the farm/blow up our core for an overpriced Nash. Carter could be the biggest steal if we got him. He fills our needs and would be the right price (don't need to sell the farm and future). It would probably take more than Tatar and a 1st but I think its a good start. I'd add Ericsson to the pot as they are interested in Dmen. Nash is too expensive at this point for a winning team to buy and his NTC would still exist in Detroit if things don't work out(which Carter doesn't have). Holland will no doubt be asking about both but I see Carter as they guy that is attainable.


#2253107 Patrick Eaves injury

Posted by dirtydangles on 06 February 2012 - 07:05 PM

I'm not sure where exactly Eaves got hit, and if this would have even made a difference for him, but the fact that it's been quoted as a head injury, I'm gonna say this:

As cool as hockey helmets are, and as much as i like them, the time has come to upgrade them with a major overhaul.  With the increased speed of the game, the increased size and strength of the players, the increased velocity of the average player's slapshot, and the increased knowledge of long term brain effects of sudden impact, the hockey player needs similar protection as the rally car/motorcycle driver.

It can be  designed in such a way with the classic body lines of a hockey helmet so as to resemble the overall shape, but it's got to be beefed up.  

Why is this never talked about by any of hockey's talking heads?


completely agree. look at what football players go out on the field with - massive helmets with face masks. They aren't moving half as fast as hockey players but still wear them.