Jump to content


St. Michael (the Red Wing)'s Photo

St. Michael (the Red Wing)

Member Since 08 Feb 2010
Offline Last Active Feb 21 2014 03:48 PM
-----

#2274835 Nyquist needs to stay here

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 28 March 2012 - 01:05 PM

I don't like seeing Nyquist on the 4th line. :thumbdown:


#2274794 Wings ranked No.14 in NHL Power Rankings..

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 28 March 2012 - 10:48 AM

Not bothered by this at all. Bring on the playoffs. :thumbup:


#2274568 Z The Beast

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 27 March 2012 - 03:34 PM

Just as I was doubting him, his numbers speak for themselves. Let's hope it continues into the playoffs... :thumbup:
  • Nev likes this


#2273624 3/24 GDT : Hurricanes 4 at Red Wings 5

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 24 March 2012 - 07:43 PM

It would be nice not to play comeback all the time.f****** been playing comeback hockey the last month if not longer.


#2272826 3/21 GDT : Red Wings 1 at Rangers 2 (OT)

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 21 March 2012 - 09:37 PM

Even though we lost good effort tonight. Got a point at least.


#2272460 How much of a steal was James Neal for Pitt?

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 21 March 2012 - 12:18 PM

Yeah.. but see people DO rip it up with pasha.. this has been a known fact. If you're a decent winger that can finish with playmaking teammates that are legitimately some of the BEST in the league, yeah you normally can produce a lot more. I don't think anyone sat here and said Neal was a horrible player, none the less able to finish. We're simply stating that when you are on a line with Malkin, and on the powerplay with Malkin AND Crosby... well come on. Now, when Neal starts going coast to coast and solo'ing his play, i'll start giving strictly him credit but his linemates deserve just as much credit for his success.


I disagree with you that Dat's linemates have ripped it up? Tell me who to be exact? Not trying to pick a fight just wondering? Dat's is going to make any player on his line better no doubt about it but he can't put the puck in the net for them.

Malkin is a great player almost the same caliber with Dat's yet he's younger. So Dat's is better than Malkin then why is Neal's numbers better? Because Neal is a better goal scorer than anyone that's been paired with Dat's minus maybe Hank but Hank really isn't a pure goal scorer now.

That's why Pittsburgh is deep right now they have a healthy and strong squad. s*** even when they weren't healthy they were winning games. Unlike us. I like to give credit where credit is due and I don't expect a lot of Wings fans to agree.

Everyone knows James Neal is a good scoring forward. But do you think that his production would have increased to this degree if he was still in Dallas?

Scorers score more when they have great playmakers centering them.


No doubt. But Neal was scoring in Dallas and look what he's doing now. And he's young. He just needs to round out his defensive game a bit I think.


#2272445 How much of a steal was James Neal for Pitt?

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 21 March 2012 - 12:03 PM

Everyone saying it's his line mates needs to get a clue.

How about Dat's linemats why aren't they ripping it up with all their feeds huh? I think people don't like to give credit where credit is due. Yes line mates help but in the end you need to finish. Neal can finish.


#2271969 3/19 GDT : Capitals 5 at Red Wings 3

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 19 March 2012 - 09:03 PM

Also like to add it's almost been like a jinx since we've acquired Quincey as well. Not that it's his fault.


#2271348 3/17 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Sharks 3 (OT)

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 18 March 2012 - 08:29 AM

Loss is a loss AGAIN. :thumbdown:

And to be honest all the negativity happens when teams lose especially with the way the Wings have been playing now injuries or not. And screw all the excuses of not having Dats or Lids. There will come a time when we won't have either of those players in our lineup.

I wouldn't call it a stretch but what are the chances of us not making the playoffs cause well everyone below us keeps winning minus us. I don't see us realistically losing the rest of the way out but hot damn.

AND PLAYOFFS EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT PLAYOFFS LIKE A DIFFERENT TEAM IS GOING TO SHOW UP?

lol. Yeah right


#2271019 3/17 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Sharks 3 (OT)

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 17 March 2012 - 09:55 PM

Weak sauce call there...


#2270988 3/17 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Sharks 3 (OT)

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 17 March 2012 - 09:42 PM

Hahaha what a start :thumbdown:


#2266028 3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 02 March 2012 - 10:18 PM

Daniels is a stud. Great announcer and congrats to him on game 1000. : )


#2262895 Ericsson out One Month

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 25 February 2012 - 11:28 PM

Get well soon Big E. Surely the Quincey deal swings (maybe) back in our favor. Bring up Smith please. I rather see him up here now than Kindl or Commodore.


#2262767 2/25 GDT : Avalanche 4 at Red Wings 3

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 25 February 2012 - 09:15 PM

Little to late.


#2262344 2/25 GDT : Avalanche 4 at Red Wings 3

Posted by St. Michael (the Red Wing) on 25 February 2012 - 10:30 AM

Need to start winning without Dats in the lineup. Lets Go Wings!! : )