Jump to content

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

atodaso's Photo


Member Since 20 Apr 2010
Offline Last Active Apr 20 2015 01:41 PM

#2103353 Let's Talk About the Refereeing

Posted by atodaso on 22 January 2011 - 03:49 PM



#2102490 1/22 GDT: Blackhawks 4 at Red Wings 1

Posted by atodaso on 22 January 2011 - 04:34 AM

Posted Image


:shout: :shout: :shout: :shout: :shout: :shout: :shout: :shout:

#2100161 Jimmy Howard will be back in net Thursday

Posted by atodaso on 19 January 2011 - 04:24 PM

i never thought i would say this but... thank god.

#2099039 A Bunch of Team Jersey Changes (May Be) Coming Soon

Posted by atodaso on 17 January 2011 - 04:20 PM

i like this one:

Posted Image

#2098763 Holmstrom suffers a broken hand

Posted by atodaso on 16 January 2011 - 06:16 PM

On mlive, Ansar Khan:

"...Holmstrom will be out three-to-four weeks after suffering a broken right hand late in Friday's game. On Saturday, he saw a hand specialist, who determined surgery is not needed."

homer is so tough he scared his hand into healing faster

#2095431 Osgood Out 6-8 Weeks

Posted by atodaso on 10 January 2011 - 10:34 PM

Damn ... good thing he got his 400th win when he did!

Is Hasek available? :lol:

nothing to laugh at there. i wish the wings would bring him back. i'm certain he can still get it done.

#2094369 1/8 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Canucks 1 (SO)

Posted by atodaso on 09 January 2011 - 12:56 AM

let's give some credit to hudler here. what a freaking shot!!

#2093445 Stuart out 6-8 weeks with broken jaw

Posted by atodaso on 08 January 2011 - 05:27 AM

It's funny. Reading the game day thread on the Calgary boards, you wouldn't even know Kostopolous hit anyone let alone broke someone's jaw. They literally have said nothing about it.

the thing is flames fans are delusional when it comes to their team. before the season started flames fans actually thought they had a good team, a playoff team. throughout this season, you would read articles in the paper that asked "what's wrong with the flames?" and "when are things going to turn around?", etc. ever since 2004, flames fans have had an unwarranted sense of entitlement (something other fan bases accuse us of, only in our case we have a reason for feeling this way), as if their team is supposed to be a contender every single year. when the flames play bad, their fans wonder why.

but the flames playing style has been the same since 2004. clutch, grab, hit, slash, fight, dump it in, get a rebound goal, etc. this type of hockey isn't going to get you the cup in today's nhl. but this is all that at least half of their fans know because they've only been 'fans' since 2004. this is why most of them defend hits like the one tonight. they think it's just good, old tough western-alberta hockey.
which is one of the reasons why i hate the flames. in fact, i think for most of us, our 'hatred' of other teams is based mainly on the way their fans think and act.

either way, the flames will be golfing in april, and that feels good.

#2093325 1/7 GDT: Red Wings 5 at Flames 4 (SO)

Posted by atodaso on 08 January 2011 - 12:06 AM

In my best Homer Simpson voice,

"Don't you hate pants?"

Posted Image

#2090205 USA vs Canada (WORLD JUNIOR SHOWDOWN)

Posted by atodaso on 03 January 2011 - 09:42 PM

Posted Image Consistently the worst winners at everything. No grace whatsoever, it is damn comical.

Posted Image

#2088293 12/31 GDT: Islanders 4 at Red Wings 3 OT)

Posted by atodaso on 31 December 2010 - 09:45 PM

Jimmy "My team has to score five goals to win" Howard.

Seriously Babcock. Time to give Ozzie more than one start in a row. It can't be worse.

i know what you were trying to say but i think his name should be Jimmy "The Rebound" Howard

#2079108 Cheerleaders for Canadian NHL team a first

Posted by atodaso on 15 December 2010 - 10:29 PM

Andrew Krystal on the FAN590 today was commenting on the Edmonton Cheerleaders. I'm not the this type of guy, but I found what he said funny! He mentioned the Edmonton cheerleaders were a little over weight and said, "Tell these women they have 1% milk now", and added, "These are the kind of girls if you're dating them and someone sees you with them in your car, you make up an excuse saying, 'No she's not my girl friend, she's dating my buddy and needed a ride to the airport'".


this andrew sounds like a loser to me

#2073831 San Jose/Detroit game discussion

Posted by atodaso on 07 December 2010 - 04:20 PM

Brush it off and come out strong the next game.

exactly. no team has ever won 82 games in a season.

when the wings are playing a good game and are winning we ask ourselves: "how do these guys ever lose a game?"
well... this is how it happens. even if they win 60 games this year they will still lose 22. this game was one of those 22.

#2073127 12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

Posted by atodaso on 04 December 2010 - 03:09 PM

welcome back drapes! :clap:

#2071962 Teams of the Decade?

Posted by atodaso on 02 December 2010 - 05:29 PM

Yes, when a baby is born it is 0 years old. Meaning that it has not lived a full year yet. A baby that is born between March 1st, 2011 and February 29th, 2012 will live 365 days and still be 0 years old in that it has not yet reached its first birthday.

But you are also an idiot. The calendar we use is based on when the birth of Jesus is believed to have happened. There are years that happened before it, and years that have occurred since. As you clearly are not very intelligent, I will enlighten you. After 1 B.C. came 1 A.D., there was no "Year 0" which fell in between. The first decade A.D was 1 A.D to 10 A.D.

the fact that you call me an idiot without knowing me at all says a lot about you.

so, i guess my only reply to you is...

Posted Image