Jump to content

rrasco's Photo


Member Since 08 Oct 2010
Offline Last Active Today, 05:24 PM

#2379787 Nyquist, Tatar, dekeyser

Posted by rrasco on 03 April 2013 - 05:01 PM

Nyquist had some great hustle/ethic on that goal he made happen on Monday.

#2375210 Calle Jarnkrok to play for GR Griffins

Posted by rrasco on 28 March 2013 - 01:54 PM

Haha, I will do my best.  How much I remember will depend on how much I tip back, but I've been a lot better about that lately.

#2375025 3/28 GDT : Red Wings 0 at Sharks 2

Posted by rrasco on 28 March 2013 - 10:24 AM

I have a bad feeling about this game after 3 solid wins it seems like the Wings are due for a stinker (judging by this seasons patterns) I hope I'm wrong.

This is one of the only times I like a later start time because it means I can watch the Griffs game to see Iron Hook play his first game in NA and still have time to watch the wings. :lol:


IIRC He was drafted as a forward and then converted to D, and recently they've put him back at forward.


Yes!  I'm glad it's a late game because I'll be at said Griffins game and I don't go to AHL games on nights with Wings' games, because the score is unavoidable there.  Excited to see Mraz and Jarnkrok.  Last time Griffins were here, it was Mrazek's first game with them, but he didn't play, and McCollum sucked it up as usual.  I kind of want to make a Tinky Winky sign too, but I'm gonna let that go by the wayside for Riley's sake.

#2374280 3/25 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 2

Posted by rrasco on 26 March 2013 - 09:31 AM

Did anyone notice after the Brunner goal how Yandle flipped his stick over and speared him in the back?

#2372056 Frk

Posted by rrasco on 22 March 2013 - 07:31 PM

No, that's Frking amazing!

#2372013 3/20 GDT : Wild 4 at Red Wings 2

Posted by rrasco on 22 March 2013 - 02:54 PM

Really?!? Suter is a -2, not very good for a defensive defenseman at a 7.5 million cap hit. Parise didn't even show up in that game, and has 23 points in 29 games, which normally would be pretty good, but for 7.5mil a year, I laugh at you. I am glad we missed out on the olsen twins, Suter is garbage without Weber, and Parise is good but they are both wayyy over payed and were way over hyped. Have fun always having a mediocre team that cannot win a cup :)


You should just ignore him.  I ran across a few of his posts on another board and the persona he is trying to hide here comes out in true color.  He was totally right about Suter/Parise (because nobody saw those two come out of left field) and he's right, we missed the playoffs (because the playoff race is over, right?).  He's just trolling these boards and it's been allowed for some reason.  The best way to get rid of him is to just ignore him.  No matter how much I want to lash out, it will only feed the troll.  I still find it funny during the offseason when he was all: I'm a Wings' fan but Minny has the best prospects evar!

#2371776 3/20 GDT : Wild 4 at Red Wings 2

Posted by rrasco on 21 March 2013 - 09:31 AM

Dammit Harold.  Couldn't I have at least got my post in before your warning?  I'll zip it.


I recorded the game and watched it starting around midnight.  That no-goal call was absolutely wrong.  I didn't understand why they wouldn't review it, but it's because the call on the ice was a high-stick with contact made by another player, not a high-stick goal.  Had the puck gone in without Toots touching it, they would have reviewed it for height/contact.  The fact that Toots helped the puck across the line meant that the play was whistled down prior to the goal, not because of the goal.  In the current set of rules, that is a non-reviewable goal and theoretically, by the book, they got it right.  However, I think anytime the puck ends up in the back of the net, it should be reviewed.  What's more important: having stupid rules or getting it right?  Even Edzo got that part right, which I was kind of surprised to hear him continue on about how that should have been reviewed.


Was that a Kronwalling or no?  I kind of want to update my site and that counter that's approaching 1 year.

#2370739 Brunner downgraded to the third line!?

Posted by rrasco on 18 March 2013 - 01:29 PM



...and I was told that I was the one always bringing him up! :lol:  I do it a lot, I admit, but its nice to see that I am certainly not the only one to turn threads into Franzine threads!


Here is the final word on my opinion, Brunner on the 3rd line is better than Cleary or Franzine in the top 6...dump Franzine now.


That's because you normally do.  I can't go a day without reading at a minimum of 3 of yours posts with 'Franzine' in them.  We get it.

#2368328 We are the Detroit Red Wings and we are making the playoffs

Posted by rrasco on 13 March 2013 - 10:24 AM

Great, I guess you like first round exits.Well the Wings have a special going on this right now...comes with a side of molasses that Dan Cleary puts in his skates before every game.


Would you rather they missed the playoffs all together?  I don't see how that is beneficial to anyone.  You can't win the tournament if you're not in it.  In that case, maybe the Wings should just move to the A.  That way we can at least play for the Cup.  Oh, yeah, not that cup, the other one.

#2367308 3/10 GDT : Blue Jackets 3 at Red Wings 2 (SO)

Posted by rrasco on 10 March 2013 - 01:58 PM

So....do we score today?

#2366724 Ovechkin Hit?

Posted by rrasco on 08 March 2013 - 05:17 PM

I've had multiple people make comments about the Ovechkin hit from this week, I think?  Something about him getting hit and slamming into the net?  I couldn't find any reference to it but had several people ask me what I thought.  Anyone know what I am talking about?

#2365819 Jimmy's Mask, I need a photo please.

Posted by rrasco on 06 March 2013 - 06:00 PM

Yep, new mask.  Not sure when he changed it.



#2365813 Jimmy's Mask, I need a photo please.

Posted by rrasco on 06 March 2013 - 05:46 PM

I guess maybe it did change.  I don't think this is the Lokomotiv mural.



#2363192 2/28 GDT : Red Wings 2 at San Jose Sharks 1 (SO)

Posted by rrasco on 01 March 2013 - 10:57 AM

You know the playoff race is tight when you win a game and move from 10th to 4th.

  • Nev likes this

#2363181 Faceoff violation Penalty

Posted by rrasco on 01 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

It's a new rule which is why it seems like they don't call it.  They have.  I've seen it called 4-5x at least during games I've watched.


Having said that, I'm not sure Pavs touched it with his hand, and if he did, his hand was still on the stick so it's not like he closed his hand on the puck.  They showed a replay of it, from the camera that was facing Pavs on ice level.  Puck was behind his gloves/stick, but I didn't see if he touched it or where it went.


What I don't get is, they allow hand passes in the defensive zone, but you can't do it off the faceoff?  If you're in the d zone, it's a hand pass, nothing more.  If you're not in your zone...then it's a hand pass and they call it down.  Why assess a penalty?  I don't remember which zone they were in, but that's irrelevant, it shouldn't be a penalty.