evilzyme

Wings need to shell Rinne again, bury the easy chances unlike on Sunday, keep the crease crowded, and actually play physical, kronner needs a series changing hit NOW.

Well, i'm not sure I liked the way they played the crease on Sunday honestly. Sometimes it seemed like they didn't know who was due infront of Rinne, so we would have two players trying to screen the same guy which lead to rebounds happening but noone close enough to actually pot it. I like crashing the net, I like pressure, but I don't like seeing cluttering which leads to missed opportunities when you can't let them be missed. What I do want, is to see some chase to the puck, some battling, some space being created. We like to pass and make the perfect play, and with a goalie like Rinne you need to throw pucks at the net and low hoping for juicy rebounds. We need powerful guys that won't be manhandled in the crease, otherwise you're worthless playing there.

this is a gongshow of a thread.

i don't get the whole twitter or tweet thing, but it seems to be a good way to get up to date news.

That is frustration right there! The whiny Vancouver ******* are getting the asses handed to them in a big way in all aspects of this series and that's how they decide to take it out. A hard clean hit should only be answered by a hard clean hit not by being jumped or forced into a fight.

Well thats one of Vancouver's problems in this season. They tried to attempt to be something they aren't, inwhich that being a hard hitting team. They tried matching the physicality of LA and they just end up getting penalties called because they're trying to match hit for hit. It's not their style, and won't be their style. A hard clean hit SHOULD be answered with a clean hard hit, or go score and pay redemption that way. I just can't stand this mindframe of, "YOU LAID A CHECK IN HOCKEY? K, WE'RE GOING TO FIGHT NOW."

The rough stuff after a clean hit is fine...and often necessary.

You have to let the other team know know that if they do that stuff, they are going to have to answer for it.
Clean hit or not, you don't want the other team thinking they can dish out hard hits all game long without repercussion...so next time, maybe they think twice about dishing out a hard hit.

It's all about team toughness and sticking up for your teammates.

Yeah there's a line to be crossed with it. In essence, you're wording it like people need to fight after every big hit and it shouldn't be the case. Welcome to hockey, you should probably know when a big hit is coming due to the fact that it normally falls upon YOU as the reason why it happened. Rookie mistakes happen and normally lead into big powerful hits because at this level people know when they can exploit your mistake. Thinking that every time someone pays for their mistake a teammate has to stick up for them is beyond the wrong mindframe to be at with hockey. If anything, you should be answering your own bell because it was your damn fault. Now if you see your teammate just getting ran over for no good reason, yeah sticking up for your buddy is fine. But we need to get this "you just hit me, LETS FIGHT" mindframe out of this new generation of hockey lovers. Trust me, the sport did good things without all this bulls***.

Another great GDT, go wings!

I love this guy. I love that you find time to waste, and decide to post the most worthless amount of s*** on LGW. You make me smile, especially when you simply just look for negatives. Hell, I would be upset if the mods decided to ban you. I think you add flavor to the board, in a horrible way.

http://twitter.com/#...269292716109824

Ndamukong Suh‏ @DirtySuh FollowI will find Shea Weber

rofl, i don't know what i'm doing with this "twitter" thing, but Suh made some funny "tweets" about Weber.

So i was driving home when danger zone came onto the radio. Its a sign ladies and gentlemen... helmer's return is near!

the pokemon thing is on the bottom in his taskbar.

and as far as the most important thing, maybe the quote where the guy says he hopes the games arent blacked out on gamecenter. dont worry i couldnt find much humor in this either.

They find it amusing someone purposely tried to get a rise out of people and said Mark my words, Stanley Cup finals = Pittsburgh Penguins vs. Columbus Blue Jackets, Jackets in 4. While then someone who thought it was just a tish bit funny replied Nah, in 3 man. I think that's the jist of it, I personally hate when people try to be funny like that.

http://features.rr.c...1Pdcb8?q=Denver
i cant find the free press or mlive versions but earlier in the season the Conner Helm Cleary line was insane. Babcock said himself that they could match any line in the league and give them a run for their money. Helmer will hopefully be back by game 2 and we'll see that 3rd line together.

This is an outstanding move. Reunite him with helm and cleary!!!!!!

One last game of the season.. one last solid effort to show us you're on the right track before playoffs. LGW 3-1 wings. Nyquist datsyuk and abby.

@jessespector
Does the NHL realize that by fining Tortorella for his comments, they basically proved his point?


rofl. pretty much.

Oh boys, that was filthy, 4-1 yotes.

I'm telling you though, I wouldn't want to play Smith or Quick first round personally. Well hell, I wouldn't want Rinne either.