Jump to content


number9's Photo

number9

Member Since 22 Nov 2010
Offline Last Active Today, 03:50 PM
-----

#2533289 Predictions for the DRW 2014-15 Season!

Posted by number9 on Today, 11:57 AM

Ryan Suters cow told me Ryan is jealous of Parises new friend Vanek.

Trade?


#2533288 Samuelsson signs new contract....... with Djurgarden.

Posted by number9 on Today, 11:48 AM

Bauers stock dips after record lows in shin pad orders this summer


#2533246 Tatar Signs 3 Year Deal $2.75 mill AAV

Posted by number9 on Today, 12:44 AM

Not saying Tatar is a money guy, but he's been up and coming for years for the wings and has always been held back, this is a good show of faith. Hopefully he hangs around longer than happy face.


#2533227 Tatar Signs 3 Year Deal $2.75 mill AAV

Posted by number9 on Yesterday, 09:32 PM

too much money. He best get 25-30 goals in each of his years...this is the reason the salary cap was put in place. There is no way a sub twenty goal scoring RFA should be anywhere near this amount. But it is Ken Holland. He hasn't changed anything in his approach. This means Diesel will get at least $4M.


Also I still hate the "diesel" nickname


#2532980 Babcock on using advanced stats

Posted by number9 on 25 July 2014 - 01:55 AM

My bachelors was in a degree relating to social stats. During that time I did my best to relate everything I did to sports (I'm not claiming to be an expert). But, when looking at advanced stats, Tatar is awesome. As in, he stand out the most. Nyquist also has formidable advanced stats. Those two are clearly ahead of the curve. Just like the opinions we would paint.




#2532911 Wings sign Zengerle

Posted by number9 on 23 July 2014 - 09:06 PM

watching his highlights I he seems like a veryyyy good first pass guy. I know we have a lot of those, but if he keeps improving I can't imagine what he could do with guys like Jurco, Tatar, and Pulikkenen on his wings. Good signing. He and Miele could end up being very good acquisitions in the near future.




#2532528 Hockey News: Detroit has the easiest schedule

Posted by number9 on 18 July 2014 - 10:17 PM

Last year we were hyped for a big comeback season. Then injuries beyond devastated us. Now we're a dark horse. I think that's good for this team. We are more than capable of proving were still contenders


#2532465 Dekeyser/Tatar status update

Posted by number9 on 18 July 2014 - 10:45 AM

 
That's a little harsh. Stuart was good for us, but he played for some powerhouse versions of our roster that would've made almost anyone in the 4D spot look good. He was a heavy hitter, but he definitely had his faults and limitations in terms of his all-around ability. DeKeyser's still very young for a top-four defenseman, and he spent most of last season paired with Quincey. He hasn't proven a ton, and yet, he has. Pretty good puck mover, good frame, good mobility, good head for the game, reads plays exceptionally well, has a slightly Lidstrom-esque sense of how to use his body efficiently and effectively - he's a top-four defenseman who plays smart, steady, elegant hockey, and he's only going to get better. We're very lucky (or, if you prefer, fortunate) to have landed him.
 
The biggest knock on DeKeyser is, I suppose, his possession numbers. This piece gives our D corp's Corsi numbers, which reveal that Brendan Smith is actually a pretty strong possession player. Of course, DeKeyser was always facing pretty tough matchups, pretty tough usage, and, again, he was stuck with Quincey. I think if DeKeyser can get a better partner and Smith can get some power play time and the confidence boost that'd come with the point production, that alone would do wonders for our blue line.


Stuart was smart and physical. Right now DD is smart.


#2532407 Dekeyser/Tatar status update

Posted by number9 on 17 July 2014 - 07:21 PM

DD doesn't even have a full 82 games under his belt yet. No way he gets 4 mil for 5


#2532347 Babcock Interview on 105.1 this morning

Posted by number9 on 17 July 2014 - 02:04 PM

I laughed when they asked what Cleary brought to the team last year and Babs said "nothing" lol at least he sees what we see


#2532307 Alfie wants to play

Posted by number9 on 16 July 2014 - 11:19 PM

Problem is, I have a better chance of winning the Lottery than us having a full season with a healthy Pav, Z, Weiss and Alfie....and Helm, Ericsson, Kronwall, Franzen, Howard, Cleary....everyone of them will be hurt at some point of the season...I just beg that its not all at the same time.


You clearly don't understand your lottery chances sir.


#2532282 Red Wings & the Media

Posted by number9 on 16 July 2014 - 03:56 PM

Checking the validity of what's said doesn't move something from the realm of "truth" into the realm of "opinion".  If Holland says "our powerplay is bad because we've been injured" and a reporter says "wait a minute, your powerplay is bad even when the team isn't injured"; that doesn't make what the reporter said an opinion.  And wouldn't you rather have a reporter ask that follow up question than just trumpet "our powerplay is bad because we were injured" back to you whether that's the actual truth or not?


Yes. But said reporter would need to present some facts that support that point.


#2532268 Red Wings & the Media

Posted by number9 on 16 July 2014 - 02:52 PM

I really think you are missing my point on him. I really don't care if anyone says something bad about a team that is doing bad.heck I will say Michigan is not doing well and that they suck sometimes..just like with the wings...but to do it even when they do good...and to never really say anything good about a team much less the whole state of Michigan just is over board to me and just makes him look like a trolling d-bag.

 

 

 

I've never heard him disparage the state so I can't speak to that.  Also, as far as him saying bad things "even when Michigan is good", we haven't been good in over a decade.  We've won 2 bowl games in ten years, and beat our biggest rival once in ten years.  Winning Conference Championships and mid-level bowl games is fine if you're Purdue, or Northwestern.  Nobody expects you to be better.  But Michigan? 

 

I guess my point is, Michigan football is supposed to be a nationally relevant football program.  That's the standard they've set for themselves, and what we've come to expect.  They haven't lived up to that in a VERY long time, and don't seem to be making any headway toward that now.  So I don't expect Drew Sharp to gush over them winning the odd Big Ten Title, or Gator Bowl.  If U of M wants more respect from the media, they need to win more.  And just like when the Tigers are good, or the Red Wings, or the Pistons, Drew will fall in line and write all the fluff pieces that fans can read.  But he won't if they aren't.   

 

Now, if you're talking about his demeanor?  I don't find it particularly problematic, but if you do I'm going to say you're wrong.  It's your opinion. 

 

110213_michigan-state_600.jpg

 

Couldn't help myself.

 

Thing is, IT IS the job of a journalist to regurgitate what management says. They are reporting what was said... and that's what was said....

 

The timing of this article, all the anonymous sources, and the writer constantly citing his own credentials, makes me question this article a lot.




#2532097 Renney out, Granato in

Posted by number9 on 14 July 2014 - 10:16 PM

 

56 GP  0G  3A, 116PIM

 

I will never forget you Aaron.     :bye2:

 

Aaron was the man. But I remember him that way bc he left when he was done.... achem Danielllllllllllllll




#2531969 Holland Wiki page edited

Posted by number9 on 13 July 2014 - 09:00 PM

What a buncha ungrateful fans editing his page like that...