Jump to content


MGreenberg's Photo

MGreenberg

Member Since 28 Feb 2011
Offline Last Active Jan 24 2012 08:38 PM
*----

#2173183 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Sharks 3

Posted by MGreenberg on 12 May 2011 - 03:53 PM

That's called Inception ... idea already explored <_<


That is why he said that because I had mentioned the movie already.


#2173170 IIHF WC 2011

Posted by MGreenberg on 12 May 2011 - 03:31 PM

Bye bye Canadians.
  • ami likes this


#2170695 Tossing a... catfish.

Posted by MGreenberg on 10 May 2011 - 10:42 AM

The octopus makes sense at least you know. Since the fans have been doing since(well I don't know how long) it took eight wins to the cup but a catfish? Makes no sense, Nashville trying to be like Detroit is just stupid.


#2170237 Is the Sharks diving.....

Posted by MGreenberg on 09 May 2011 - 01:40 PM

The Thornton dive was almost as good as this one




#2170124 Clowe Gets Kronwalled

Posted by MGreenberg on 09 May 2011 - 10:38 AM

And....boom goes the dynamite!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgsied-_URM&feature=related


Ah, so that is the hit that made Clowe ***** and then get Kronwalled himself. Guess Clowe needs to learn to be quiet.


#2170116 Happy Birthday

Posted by MGreenberg on 09 May 2011 - 10:14 AM

:notworthy: :notworthy:


Happy Birthday to the Captain.(Sorry Nick)


#2169808 Howard......

Posted by MGreenberg on 08 May 2011 - 09:51 PM

He has stepped up huge, I am no longer a doubter.


#2169769 Game 6 Line-Up

Posted by MGreenberg on 08 May 2011 - 09:44 PM

I think the worst thing they could do is put Hudler back in, he has been awful from what I have seen from him.


#2166425 WCSF Game 3 GDT: Sharks 4 at Red Wings 3 (OT)

Posted by MGreenberg on 04 May 2011 - 10:27 PM

Detroit needs to invent a cloning machine. Clone Datsyuk and Zetterberg five times each and clone Lidstrom five times as well then sign some amazing goalie.

Then our line up could be
Dats - Z - Dats
Z - Dats - Z
Dats - Dats - Dats
Z - Z - Z

Nick - Nick
Nick - Nick
Nick - Nick


#2166356 WCSF Game 3 GDT: Sharks 4 at Red Wings 3 (OT)

Posted by MGreenberg on 04 May 2011 - 10:15 PM

Wings Kryptonite - Sharks
Sharks Kryptonite - Conference Finals

******* another depressing OT loss.


#2166328 WCSF Game 3 GDT: Sharks 4 at Red Wings 3 (OT)

Posted by MGreenberg on 04 May 2011 - 10:13 PM

It's ok guys. The Wings will learn how to play for one game like last year and then lose.


#2166297 WCSF Game 3 GDT: Sharks 4 at Red Wings 3 (OT)

Posted by MGreenberg on 04 May 2011 - 10:10 PM

Well, I am done. Only way I am watching the Wings is if it is Game 7. Jimmy needs to stop that shot.


#2166132 WCSF Game 3 GDT: Sharks 4 at Red Wings 3 (OT)

Posted by MGreenberg on 04 May 2011 - 09:40 PM

Ok, all the negativity needs to go away from this thread now. The Wings will do this tonight.


#2162382 WCSF Game 1 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Sharks 2 (OT)

Posted by MGreenberg on 01 May 2011 - 01:09 AM

I hate people who use that didn't deserve to win bulls***. Did the Wings get outplayed? Sure I think most of us can agree on that but when did San Jose actually score? On a dive by Pavelski who acted like he got hit by a bus which led to their game tying power play.

If the Sharks score 5 on 5 to tie it then I doubt any of us would be bitching about the refs as much but the fact is they tied it on that power play. But I do know that the Wings will need a solid performance out of everyone if they want to to win instead of just Pavel and Jimmy playing great.


#2162370 WCSF Game 2 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Sharks 2

Posted by MGreenberg on 01 May 2011 - 12:36 AM

Just to put this in perspective.....The wings have lost ONE game in the Stanley Cup Playoffs....One game...in overtime- After all the crazy 7 game series, comebacks and breakdowns, we do NOT need to panic yet. Relax, enjoy...they will be fine!


Yeah, too many people are way too negative. Do I ***** about players or the team when they play bad sure, most of us and fans of other teams do but the next game I try to be optimistic. But to dismiss the team after one loss in overtime is a bit over the top.