Jump to content

kipwinger's Photo


Member Since 31 May 2011
Online Last Active Today, 08:25 AM

#2518280 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 29 April 2014 - 08:35 PM


Holmgren is known for awful trades, lets go after Simmonds lol


It'll never work, Holmgren only makes shockingly poor decisions when 30 goal forwards are involved (Richards, Carter, Lecavalier, Van Riemsdyk).  Simmonds has only ever had 29.  To think, one more goal and Holmgren would probably have shipped him to Detroit for Daniel Alfredsson's youth. 

#2518163 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 29 April 2014 - 12:14 PM


I feel like most GM'S are cyclical, usually they make some bad moves followed by some good moves and round and round it goes. Holland's issue has been that lately he's been lacking in good moves, and while you'r right he hasn't done anything crippling, he's hurt the team in other ways. Like wasting cap and roster spots on unworthy players, he also seems to have lost the midas touch in luring top flight UFA's. It's become strange that no top free agent wants to take the Wings money-maybe they're not offering enough?-I don't know... I don't advocate firing him, because who would the Wings get that was better? Sooner or later the fan base would turn on the new GM anyway. I would however like to see Holland get his head out of the sand and join the real world, he's got to realize his moves lately have been beyond atrocious; he's got to get off his hands and finally upgrade the D along with finding a scoring winger for Pav-while Pav is still at the top of his game.


I definitely agree with some of the things you've said.  For instance, Holland is notoriously stingy when it comes time to make offers to free agents (remember Wisniewski's 'market value' comment).  But I don't think his moves have been as bad as people think.  Hindsight has shown that some of them haven't worked out, but who could have known at the time.  For instance, it's easy to say that he doesn't attract top flight FA's, but Weiss and Alfie were both at the top of their respective FA cohorts.  Likewise, the Quincey move is generally considered bad.  But prior to coming back he'd been playing top four minutes and scoring around 30 pts. a season.  And he was young and still had development potential.  Easily worth a first at the time.  With Legwand I'd generally agree we overpaid, but Poile had us over a barrel and we knew it.  Even then, we were still getting a very good two way center capable of putting up good numbers.  It's mindblogging how he was used, but that's not his fault.  Tootoo?  Same deal as Legwand.  They both just did what they do, no knock on their game.


The two worst things that Holland did recently were bring back Cleary and give Sammy a No Trade Clause.  The first is defensible because Babs and the team leadership intervened on Cleary's behalf.  The NTC is indefensible and was just a plain bad move.  Neither of them, it turns out, actually impacted the team negatively all that much, though it maybe have impacted the Illitch's pocketbook (hard to feel bad for them considering they haven't paid taxes in about ten years lol). 


The question I would have is how high would the bar be set for Mantha to beat someone out? 


Very far considering he has no systems training and Babs runs one of the most demanding systems in the league.  This kid has zero chance of making the team next season.  Letting him learn the system in GR from Blashill is the right call, just not the sexy one. 

#2518153 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 29 April 2014 - 11:03 AM


my d-man off season wishlist right there.


he's had a breakout year, is good size, right handed, reletively young.... geterrdone kenny! 


I would be legitimately happy if Holland did nothing else but sign Niskanen and let all the obvious free agents walk.  You can always fill needs at the deadline, but I'd be perfectly happy going into next season with...












Edit:  Obviously the means trading Andersson, Kindl, and Lashoff for whatever you can get (not roster players).

#2518140 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 29 April 2014 - 10:03 AM


He doesn't seem to have the same perspective and competitive nature that Nill, Scotty, Yzerman etc had.


Those games were close only via score, you're 100% right.


No one thought we were winning those games after the ice shifted in game 4 and really in game 5 it seemed like Boston was toying with us, playing just hard enough to win and move on.


Well I certainly agree with the second half of your post.  But I'm actually a Holland fan.  That doesn't mean I don't think he makes mistakes from time to time, he does, but usually his mistakes don't end up crippling the team in any serious way.  Think of all his big "mistakes" e.g. Sammy, Tootoo, Quincey, bringing Cleary back, and then think about other people's big mistakes and you immediately feel better.  He could have signed David Clarkson to a 5.2 million dollar contract for 7 years, given Ryane Clowe 4.8 million for 5 years despite his history of concussions, or traded away Mike Richards and Jeff Carter and Sergei Bobrovsky and James Van Riemsdyk for Wayne Simmonds/Jakub Voracek/ the Schenn brothers and some picks. 


In the end, Holland's really done a pretty good job. 

#2518132 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 29 April 2014 - 09:09 AM

Why I want Holland gone...He thinks this series was close.


“It was a learningicon1.png experience,” Holland said. “When you look at it, Game 5 was 3-2 (before a Boston empty-net goal), Game 4 went into overtime. Those were close games.”

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitne...5#ixzz30HeHvCoW


I'm not going to try and talk you into liking Holland, you seem pretty dead set against it.  But those were close games (on the scoreboard).  Only problem is that despite their closeness, we had no realistic shot at winning any of them. 

#2518026 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 28 April 2014 - 03:31 PM


I already explained this but I'll do it again because you suck at reading. I am not good at CapGeek and so we'd get better players for Abby, Nyq, Howard. Those were trades and I didn't figure out how to get players in return.




I was goofing around. And yet that team definitely goes further against the Bruins than we just did.

Players are about chemistry, too. 

The Leafs are not good. Bolland would be good with Dats and Jagr. He is hard on the puck and can score. He is quicker than Abby.

Brodeur would teach Petr to be a real great goalie. 

Blah, it doesn't matter, we are not the GMs. We are just goofing around online.

Ken Holland will ultimately f*** this all up however he pleases.


Just an observation...


I think the reason you're finding such antipathy to your ideas is because many of your posts have been matadorish and confrontational. 


I assure you, we're all perfectly reasonable people who would gladly hear what you've got to say and respectfully debate with you, provided you would stop being so insulting during the exchange. 

#2518021 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 28 April 2014 - 03:22 PM

(Spoiler alert:  I'm going to talk about James Wisniewski a lot in this post.  I'm not pining for him, or lamenting any past decisions.  I'm just using him as an example to explain why we should pursue Niskanen.  If your response to the post is, "Wisniewski suckz!" you missed the point).


I don't want to get into the weeds too much on this issue (that's what this summer is for), but I do think we should sign Matt Niskanen. Sure you'd have to overpay (a little) for him, but we've got the money and he fills a TON  of needs.  He's an up an coming young, right handed, top four, puck mover, who's very good on the pp.  He's also coming into the age were d-men finally hit their stride.  


All summer everyone will nitpick and find reasons to not like this move, just like they did back when we were all debating about whether to acquire Wisniewski a couple years ago.  They'll say the contract is bad, they'll say it's an overpayment, they'll put a microscope on each and every one of his shortcomings.  But at the end of the day, the amount you'll overpay will less than what you'll pay all the scrubs you'll bring in trying to find a cheap alternative. 


Think about it this way, using Wisniewski as an example.  Let's say he's getting paid a million more than he's worth (he'd be worth every penny of 4.5 million for his pts., aggressiveness, and pp shot alone).  Over the life of his contract you overpaid him by six million dollars.  How much did we pay Commodore, White, and Colaiacovo total?  A good bit more and got worse players.  At the very least the 51 extra points and physicality might have been nice this season.

#2517925 What Happened to Nyquist?

Posted by kipwinger on 28 April 2014 - 08:58 AM

Beg to differ. Adding guys like Nyquist and tatar is much easier-as the wings have proven time and time again. We come up with guys like them every year. Finding guys like Lucic is the hardest thing to do and most costly to trade for. If you took the 2 of them and tried to get Lucic, Kopitar, backus, etc.... in a deal, the answer would be no everytime.



Backus?  I wouldn't trade Emmerton for him.  That guy is terrible!



#2514768 ECQF - Game 4 - Bruins 3 at Red Wings 2 (F/OT)

Posted by kipwinger on 24 April 2014 - 04:10 PM

I truly hope Bert has one last insane series left in him and he propels us past the Bruins.  Just so that everyone who talked s*** about him all year (including me) can suck an egg.  Also, so that he'll get the Cup handed to him first before Alfie.

#2514762 ECQF - Game 4 - Bruins 3 at Red Wings 2 (F/OT)

Posted by kipwinger on 24 April 2014 - 04:01 PM

His hand exploded. He will come back next season with a hockey glove made of solid gold.


I heard they were doing something like this...



#2514714 Bertuzzi in, Jurco out

Posted by kipwinger on 24 April 2014 - 02:27 PM

I'm only ok with the roster change if Bertuzzi does this to Lucic...



#2514630 Bertuzzi in, Jurco out

Posted by kipwinger on 24 April 2014 - 11:13 AM

Well at least Babs has finally identified the source of our goal scoring problems and taken steps to mitigate the issue...(puke).

#2514625 ECQF - Series C - Penguins versus Blue Jackets

Posted by kipwinger on 24 April 2014 - 11:09 AM


We'd have to play the Habs first though.


And Pittsburgh would have to beat Columbus, which is not a guarantee.

#2514543 ECQF - Series C - Penguins versus Blue Jackets

Posted by kipwinger on 24 April 2014 - 08:20 AM

If Columbus doesn't blow two third period leads this series is over and Crosby's back in Halifax (or wherever the hell he's from), cod fishing and playing tiddlywinks (or whatever they do there). 

#2514410 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by kipwinger on 23 April 2014 - 03:25 PM


What's market value?  Who's deciding that?  Certainly not you.  And you have no idea why the coach is playing him on that line- could it be that he's trying to get Legwand to play with people he's comfortable with?  We've had one of the most active rosters over the last four weeks, with a crazy number of different lines.  Nobody seems to be comfortable out there right now.



I don't dictate the market.  Supply and Demand does.  And there aren't a lot of 50 pt. centers on the market.  Expecting Legwand to make the same money in a thin free agent class after putting up 51 pts. as well as being a quality veteran, leader, and 2 way player is silly.  If you don't think so, I don't know what to tell you. 


You're right, I don't know why Babcock is playing him down there, but I do know that Legwand looked plenty comfortable with Nyquist and Franzen when that line was singlehandedly carrying us into the playoffs.