Jump to content

kipwinger's Photo


Member Since 31 May 2011
Online Last Active Today, 02:58 AM

#2445116 Accidental or intentional hit by Brouwer?

Posted by kipwinger on 17 October 2013 - 11:15 AM

I mean, it doesn't really matter does it.  You're responsible for not hitting guys in the head, accidentally or not.  He doesn't have a history of this, which should keep the punishment to a minimum, but at the end of the day you can't do that.

#2445114 10/17 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Avalanche 2

Posted by kipwinger on 17 October 2013 - 11:12 AM

Hand the Avs there first loss.
I don't think Roy will go crazy tonight, he knows Babcock could clean the ice with him.
$10 on Babs if there is a showdown.


I wonder if Babs ever fought when he played minors, or if he'd just healthy scratch anyone he didn't like.

#2445112 10/17 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Avalanche 2

Posted by kipwinger on 17 October 2013 - 11:07 AM

I miss the rivalry. Big part of my childhood.


Mackinnon was talking about watching clips of those classic games on YouTube. It made me feel old. :unhappy:




Haha, I read that too and thought the exact same thing.  For a while I was an assistant professor at Central Michigan, and trying to relate to the 18 year old freshman was an exercise in futility.  Pretty much the exact same thing going on here.

#2445052 10/15 GDT : Blue Jackets 1 at Red Wings 2

Posted by kipwinger on 16 October 2013 - 08:00 PM

I'd like to see...just for a game or two.







#2445038 Sabres' Kaleta suspended 10 games.

Posted by kipwinger on 16 October 2013 - 04:53 PM

What's funny is Cooke talks about it as if he had to adjust some subtle aspects of his technique. As if his history was an inadvertent and unfortunate part of his playing style.

When really it comes down to 1) don't elbow guys in the head. 2) don't hit guys square in the numbers and ram them facefirst into the boards, 3) don't stick out your knee to hit another guys leg as you check them.

Voila! With those complex adjustments to Matt Cooke's game, 99% of his suspensions would be gone.


"It’s just a read. If you don’t change the way you visually see the game, then change is impossible." - Matt Cooke


Translation:  Once you begin seeing opposing players as human beings, and not like animals to be slaughtered, it's much easier to play hockey without intentionally trying to ruin their lives.

#2445032 Lineup Crunch: Who's going?

Posted by kipwinger on 16 October 2013 - 04:34 PM


Think about it again from the viewpoint of a team like Buffalo or Florida though.  They're not making the playoffs and are not even close to contenders. They're number one priority is long-term growth player and development. So why bring in overpaid guy like Sammy who's borderline retired and not known for his leadership?  He will only take away minutes from those whom the team actually wants to develop while (if he actually did provide scoring) distancing them from a lottery pick. Teams like that (whether losing or not) want to create a positive atmosphere and a guy who just got ditched by a cup contender is not going to help with that.


Sure, that's a definite possibility.  And perhaps Buffalo is a long shot in that regard.  But Sammy has a history with Florida, had a moderate degree of success with them, and every young team needs veterans around the locker room.  An example would be Vinny Prospal with Columbus.  He was a guy at the tail end of his career who was a successful contributor on a young team and really helped in the leadership department.   


Again, I'm not saying it's going to happen, but it's not out of the ballpark either. 

#2444998 3 in a row.... I'll take it!

Posted by kipwinger on 16 October 2013 - 02:00 PM


How are the wings a young team?


Because Abby, Miller, Glendening, Kindl, Ericsson, Smith, Lashoff, Dekeyser, Tatar, Quincey, Andersson, Howard, and Gustavsson are all in their twenties. 

#2444996 Lineup Crunch: Who's going?

Posted by kipwinger on 16 October 2013 - 01:53 PM

If the choice is Eaves or Tootoo that should be a no brainer. Eaves doesnt add anything unique to the lineup.


Eaves is a much better all around player.  He kills penalties, Tootoo doesn't.  He scores goals occasionally, Tootoo doesn't.  He's a really good defender, Tootoo isn't.  Tootoo hits much better than Eaves, and that is unique, but in every other facet of the game Patrick Eaves is a superior player to Jordin Tootoo.

#2444853 10/15 GDT : Blue Jackets 1 at Red Wings 2

Posted by kipwinger on 15 October 2013 - 09:00 PM

I know you're being sarcastic, but my impression overall is that most people weren't against Bertuzzi as much as Cleary and Samuelsson. Bertuzzi is extremely streaky, but when healthy, he's a big body with good hands that can still be a valuable asset to the Red Wings. Done a nice job creating space and going to the front of the net for the Euro Twins so far.


It's more of a knock on the general anti-veteran sentiment that's been pervasive since Cleary resigned.  I agree with you about Bert though.

#2444851 10/15 GDT : Blue Jackets 1 at Red Wings 2

Posted by kipwinger on 15 October 2013 - 08:51 PM

So it's Bert's goal now. Assisted by Z and Kronner.


2 goals on the season for Bert...what a waste of space.

#2444757 10/15 GDT : Blue Jackets 1 at Red Wings 2

Posted by kipwinger on 15 October 2013 - 07:37 PM

Both calls were weak.


Maybe the refs and/or league have it out for both teams.  Ever think about that?

#2444692 10/15 GDT : Blue Jackets 1 at Red Wings 2

Posted by kipwinger on 15 October 2013 - 03:51 PM

I hope our boys are ready to work tonight, because Columbus plays a really gritty game.  This will be one of our tougher back to back games this season. 

#2444570 10/14 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Bruins 2

Posted by kipwinger on 14 October 2013 - 07:49 PM


I don't really see what he said that was so awful. 


He admits to being caught twice and having Quincey save him.  kind of admits to being bad that game but thinks he's been good other games. 



To me, this was the more interesting and cryptic comment from Babcock about Tatar.



I completely agree with you about the Tatar comments.  It's really hard for me to figure out Babs actual thoughts on guys because I think he's often putting his sports psychology training into practice when he comments on them.  It seems like he believes some guys respond well to criticism, and others need to be insulated from criticism.  He's always really supportive of Smith, in spite of his troubles, but rarely gives Kindl any sort of encouragement without first "grounding" him a bit.  I don't think he likes one more than the other, but he treats them very differently.  I have to think that his comments about Tatar are just more of the same.


As far as Smith's comments, I don't recall a time when a player admitted to not knowing how to improve, and it's hard for me to believe that he hasn't been told why he's not in the lineup.  Additionally, the "I am a minus-4, but if you watch those goals, I don’t think there’s a breakdown on my side" line bothers me because it points a finger at other players, and obscures the fact that his in zone coverage, and decision making with the puck has been terrible.  If his play was up to par he wouldn't have been scratched twice in two games, so either he screwed up on those goals and isn't owning up to it, or he didn't screw up on those particular goals but every other facet of his game needs work.  Either way, saying "the goals weren't my fault" deflects attention onto his teammates, and doesn't address whatever it is that has cost him a regular spot in the lineup. 


I don't remember other young defensemen behaving that way.

#2444523 10/14 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Bruins 2

Posted by kipwinger on 14 October 2013 - 04:17 PM


If the score had been 3-1 Boston, in Detroit, the calls would've probably been in Detroit's favor.  Nearly every ref in the league is guilty of it to some extent, but Brad Watson is the worst . 


Also, if there's any league that would fix games via reffing, it's the NHL.  The MLB, and NFL don't need it, but you know how the NHL sells itself on parity and close games.  


If the NHL were going to fix games, why would they waste time fixing games for a franchise that's going to win anyway?  Both Detroit and Boston are perennial contenders with strong fan bases.  If the fix was in, wouldn't you expect the NHL to help out Florida, Tampa, Dallas, or Phoenix (the team the NHL owned for years)?


Why the hell would you conspire to help a team that doesn't need it?


Conspiracy theories are stupid.

#2444495 10/14 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Bruins 2

Posted by kipwinger on 14 October 2013 - 03:01 PM


It was obvious they wanted the Bruins to win. I know how childish that sounds, but it's true. Even my Bruins fan friend agrees, and that's saying something.


Brad Watson hates the Wings, IMHO.


Watson hates the Wings eh?  Why?  Did Mike Ilitch f*** his wife? 


You're suggesting that a professional referee, who gets paid to be objective, is being obviously biased against a team for no good reason whatsoever.  And you have nothing to substantiate these claims, except your honest opinion.  An opinion which couldn't possibly be clouded because you're a fan of the team who got the short end of the stick today.


Nobody is conspiring the keep the Wings down.  There are lots of games where we have more powerplays.  I don't see any of you lining up to cry shenanigans when it favors us. 


Sad fact is, so far this season we're a team that takes a lot of penalties.  We've been taking too many penalties since game one.  It's not a conspiracy, it's just sloppy play.