Jump to content

kipwinger's Photo


Member Since 31 May 2011
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 07:41 PM

#2443163 10/10 GDT: Coyotes 4 at Red Wings 2

Posted by kipwinger on 10 October 2013 - 08:16 PM

Howard looks injured. Very slow.


We need an elite, top-pairing puck-mover. I think it's pretty clear the D overachieved last season.


You mean like two time all star Keith Yandle?  The man who I've been pining for for two years, and who most LGWers say "isn't very good defensively", yet who (when compared to our d-core) looks like a superstar? 


Yeah I don't know where we'd find a guy like that.

#2442988 Tootoo Cleared to Play

Posted by kipwinger on 10 October 2013 - 01:42 PM

Well according to the Free Press Babcock thinks the Wings need to play "heavier"...whatever that means.  So we can expect to have Tootoo in the lineup, since he's an actual fourth liner and "heavy" is the name of his game right?  Oh wait...






#2442867 Stuart faces hearing for hit to head

Posted by kipwinger on 09 October 2013 - 04:43 PM

How is that hit to Nash's head any worse than this hit Nash put on Kopecky and didn't get a suspension? 


#2442672 Good read. Good to know....

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 12:45 PM

" The third line of Joakim Anderson centering Daniel Cleary and Todd Bertuzzi has yet to score a point this season and is a combined - 8"

only if are third line was Nyquist Andersson Tatar

One can dream...


I think you'll see it before long.  Babs had no problem playing the kids on that line last season.  I think right now they're trying to showcase certain players for potential trades, and also trying to figure out which guys they want to keep.  I realistically imagine that the kids will form the third line, and some combination of Cleary, Emmerton, Miller, and Bertuzzi will make up the fourth until Helm is healthy.  It's coming, but we've all got to be patient.  A few more stinkers like last game will undoubtedly speed up the process as well.

#2442664 Will young talent ever speak out against Wings philosophy?

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 12:23 PM

Very simple: yes you do what you have too to win the job.


So you'd be ok with it if Jarnkrok took a run at Zetterberg and injured him to "win the job"?  I don't believe you.  And this is a big if, but even if you actually believe that it says quite a lot about your character.

#2442663 Steve Yzerman wants Game Misconduct penalties for fighting

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 12:13 PM

Sorry Stevie but I disagree. fact is you spent a good portion of your career-nearly all being protected by guys like Probert, Kocur, McCarty, Shanny, etc....... You had 1 career fight, lost badly, and were smart enough to never do it again, which counters your argument. no one has to fight. But most star players are glad there are guys that do.

Some of us remember that wonderful evening back in 1997 when the RW finally became a champion. No it wasn't a 5 goal night from federov or stevie, it wasn't the night we finally lifted the cup over our heads, it was a couple of months earlier than that, at the Joe vs the Avs in March. Every RW fan under 30 knows that night. But most can't tell you who won the game, or what the final score was. But everyone remembers the night of the turtle. Everyone remembers Mccarty redeeming his best friends honor. Everyone remembers Shanny clocking Roy, and then letting Vernon pummel Roy. BTW the final score was 6-5 RW's, with McCarty scoring the game winner-something he wouldn't be allowed to do if Stevie had his way. Same guy scored the Cup winning goal a few months later.


If nobody were allowed to change their minds I'd still think Sesame Street was the greatest show in the world, and I'd still want to be a transformer when I grew up. 

#2442659 Will young talent ever speak out against Wings philosophy?

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 11:51 AM

Like when little Bert put Jensen on the LTIR? Everyone on the forum was for it. Trying to make an impression and a name for himself. Go back a few years. probert, kocur, grimson all practiced fighting. Tommy hearns used to box Mccarty lapointe etc..... There are tryout videos online of McKee fighting others in the USHL tryout camp. Every player has to play their game to earn a spot. You do what you have too to make it. 


Do you honestly not see any difference between an enforcer taking boxing lessons, and one teammate taking "a run" at another teammate in order to "knock him out of the lineup for a while"?  I think that you do, and I think you're just being obtuse just for the sake of it.  Futhermore, I certainly don't think you'd have advocated this position if it were say...Filppula hurting Datsyuk in order to gain an opportunity he didn't previously have. 


Nice try, but I'm not buying what you're selling. 

#2442657 Will young talent ever speak out against Wings philosophy?

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 11:41 AM

Yes. That is what young players are supposed to do: earn a roster spot/playing time. Which as of today nyquist and Tatar haven't. maybe it is do to blind loyalty or maybe it is because they are not as good as the vets some fans want them to replace.

Yes waiting for your chance is hard to do. Then do something about it. As Ric Flair used to say "To be the man, you have to beat the man". There is a lot of trueth in that statement.


Jesus, you're ok with it too.  Listen I'm all for young guys outplaying older ones, happens all the time.  He suggested that they should "take runs" at veteran players and injure them during practice in order to make an opportunity for themselves.  That isn't outplaying anyone.  That's borderline psychotic.  It's not at all different than what Tonya Harding did to Nancy Kerrigan.  It's f*cking nuts!  These guys are your teammates, your buddies, not your f*cking Game of Thrones rival. 

#2442654 Will young talent ever speak out against Wings philosophy?

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 11:26 AM



Maybe it's just me - I dunno.....If I were a 'prospect' in the Wings system - I'd seriously consider taking a run at a guy like Bertuzzi/Sammy/Cleary at summer/fall camp.....If anything - you'll get noticed, and maybe you'll get lucky, and knock one of the 3 mentioned outta the line up for a bit, and create an opportunity for yourself.


Are you advocating hurting your own teammate in practice to get ahead?  How very "Black Swan" of you.  I'd hate to be your coworker, god knows what you'd do for a better parking spot. 

#2442652 Steve Yzerman wants Game Misconduct penalties for fighting

Posted by kipwinger on 08 October 2013 - 11:17 AM

Ok...The brutally honest neanderthal inside me has gotta reply...


Wings vs Blue Jackets - OR - Habs vs Bruins...Guess what I'll watch?


Wings vs Yotes - OR - Flyers vs Bruins...Take a guess?


Wings vs Panthers - OR - Leafs vs Habs...Seeing what I'm getting at?


I love me some physical tough hockey, and if things get heated, and a few scraps between willing combatants breaks out - even better!


Again - it's why I'll take our 97/98 Cup teams anyday over our 08 team...Maybe we'll see some of the intensity renewed now that we're with our old rivals from the east.


I guess this is where we differ.  You'd apparently rather watch two teams, neither of whom you're a fan of, just because they're more likely to punch each other.  I'd rather watch the Red Wings win.  I'd rather watch Datsyuk dangle, Kronwall hit, and Jimmy stand on his head.  I'd rather see the game where our powerplay finally comes alive, or Alfie get his first goal as a Wing, or a four goal night from Mule, or Mrazek come off the bench because of a (non-serious) injury to Jimmy and play out of this world. 


There's no need to invent drama in sports, there's always something there.  Even against the Panthers.  I always thought that's what makes a diehard fan.  When you don't miss a game, regardless of the opponent.  When you don't leave early, even during a loss.  When you always find something to be excited about.  When you'd rather watch the Detroit Red Wings play the Phoenix Coyotes than the Bruins and the Habs, not because it'll be the best game ever, but because they're the Detroit F*cking Red Wings and they're the best team ever.  And for games like against Carolina.  A nobody. 


But apparently, when you're being honest, you'd rather see one guy punch another guy.

#2442583 Pet Names

Posted by kipwinger on 07 October 2013 - 08:30 PM

Don't name it after a Red Wing, name it after someone especially deserving here on LGW.  Then we can all compete for your favor by "liking" all your posts.  Person with the most "likes" wins the prize.

#2442562 Steve Yzerman wants Game Misconduct penalties for fighting

Posted by kipwinger on 07 October 2013 - 04:45 PM


Fighting has been practically extinct from the Wings' game for years.  I wonder how many people on these forums find watching them similar to figure skating.


Haha, what are you talking about?  The Wings team has been populated by such monumental bad*sses as Brad May, Dallas Drake, and Aaron Downey.  And as you well know, those men are collectively responsible for keeping Dats, Z, and Lidstrom safe during those years.  Nowadays, Tootoo, Ericsson, and Bertuzzi can't hold and candle to those great gladiators of the past. 

#2442478 Devils sign Brunner 2 yrs. $2.5 million AAV

Posted by kipwinger on 06 October 2013 - 11:55 PM

Brunner scored three hat tricks tonight.


I believe it's called the "Ovechtrick".  Look it up.  :nono:

#2442476 Steve Yzerman wants Game Misconduct penalties for fighting

Posted by kipwinger on 06 October 2013 - 11:42 PM

Seems to me like the big argument for fighting is that it stops the dirty players from being dirty and taking "runs" at your guys.  For the moment I'm willing to overlook the fact that fighting has been around forever, and so have dirty players, and as of yet the former has yet to deter the latter.  My biggest concern here is rather that the majority of fights don't have anything to do with dirty plays.  If you exclude opening faceoff (Tootoo) fights, and fights that occur because of LEGAL (yet still hard) hits, and fights between enforcers who aren't involved in any dirty play (Orr vs. Parros), and fights that break out because other fights are going on (Miller vs. Bernier), or enforcer rematches, then you're left with very few fights where guys are policing dirty play.


As Red Wings fans, we don't see a lot of fights.  We also all remember Lemieux on Draper, or Weber on Zetterberg, and those things leave a bad taste in our mouths.  So it's just natural to assume that things like this are the primary cause of fights.  But the sad fact is that most fights have nothing to do with policing the game.  There's nothing that noble going on most of the time. 


Fights happen because they always have, and for the time being they are still looked upon favorably by too many sad, old, apes who can't stop romanticizing the past.

#2441764 10/4 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Hurricanes 2 (OT)

Posted by kipwinger on 04 October 2013 - 07:37 PM

Well, anybody remember the first game of last season?  We've got a lot to figure out, but I'm not too worried right yet.  That said, we need to straighten out the bottom six and probably get a grip on these penalties sooner rather than later.