This case needs to be observed individualy of the voynov case. Each case is unique unto their own. The evidence was pretty discerning immediately after it unfolded regarding voynov. However there has not been enough evidence to indict Kane at this point. I am by no means defending kane, and believe his reputation precedes him. Also I am a prosecutor not a defense attorney, but I am reminded of a case that I studied regarding rape. A USC football player was accused of rape by a high school "friend", and sentenced to 15 years. 2 years later, while he was in prison she came clean that it was a bribe contrived by her mother. I'm not saying he is innocent, but we need to take our fan bias out of the equation until our justice system rules on the case. Is it perfect? No, however the system gets it right more than it gets it wrong. In this case there isn't enough evidence to send it straight to trial, so let's wait to judge the league until after.
Hawks should put him on the shelf until this is resolved
Innocent until proven guilty?
Yeah, stay classy Chicago
MasterPavelMember Since 10 Jan 2013
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 10:40 PM
- Group Member
- Active Posts 436
- Profile Views 2,131
- Member Title 3rd Line Checker
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown