You're interpretation of the word Anything is way too literal.
Was just doing what people tend to do on these forums. Take words out of context and meaning and try to argue for the sake of arguing. Anyways, it was interesting to see different perspectives. You won't see me barking on about the comments made at the moment; right now the opinions are interesting to take in and analyze, not necessarily to fight against.
Pavel hasn't been "feeding" Tatar anything. Pav has assisted on 6 of Tatar's goals. The same number that Sheahan has assisted on. And just ahead of Nyquist and Dekeyser, who have each assisted on 5 of his goals.
Heheheh. I'm sorry I just couldn't wait till someone got upset about that comment. U win! I shall now attend the 2 pages of entertainment you have started. Your statistical argument is flawed however if you aren't looking at chances created by Datsyuk whether or not it ended in a goal or quality of competition on being on first line vs. when he was with Sheahan. We need all the details! Show em!
Now in reference to the first statement you made "Pavel hasn't been 'feeding' Tatar anything" You then stated Pav assisted on 6 of Tatar's goals. Didn't you just contradict the very first statement? I mean if he hasn't "fed" him ANYTHING like you said. Shouldnt the assists number be 0? I'm just working with your language here cause it seems kinda black and white.