While I don't disagree with your logic, I will say this. Tatar and Nyquist have outperformed Datsyuk and Zetterberg (both regular season and playoffs) at similar points in their careers. Dats and Z weren't very good in the playoffs at all during their first few years. And they were about the same ages when they came into the league (arguably both with MORE experience than Nyquist or Tats).
I agree, there's nothing to guarantee that either of these guys will be stars. But based on the information we have, and observation and comparison to our last two stars, I don't think it's out of the question either. At the very least it's premature to think these two guys are don't improving given their respective ages and experience levels. Consistent 65-70 point seasons is not out of the question for either of them. Which isn't super star talent, but isn't anything to scoff at either.
Nyquist in 4 seasons -
Season: 179 Games played - 115 points. PPG 0.64
Playoffs: 30 Games played - 7 points PPG 0.23
Zetterberg in 4 seasons -
Season: 280 Games played - 240 points. PPG 0.85
Playoffs: 40 Games played - 25 points PPG 0.625
Statistically, Zetterberg was better in his first 4 seasons in both playoffs and in regular season than Nyquist.
Datsyuk in 4 seasons -
Season: 284 Games played - 241 points. PPG 0.85
Playoffs: 42 Games played - 21 points PPG 0.5
Datsyuk had the same exact Point per game ratio in his first 4 seasons as Zetterberg and still higher than Nyquist in his first four seasons. Datsyuk's playoff numbers were inferior to Zetterberg's in his first 4 seasons but it was still better than Nyquists.
Can't look at Tatar's number's quiet yet as he's only played 2 legitimate seasons and playoffs.
Both Zetterberg and Datsyuk also killed penalties and had more responsibilities than Tatar and Nyquist did (or ever will, they simply are not even close to being as good defensively as the other two were).
- Internet.Unknown likes this