Jump to content

ami's Photo


Member Since 05 Jun 2003
Offline Last Active Jan 30 2015 07:17 PM

#2201520 Dry Island: The Flyers of Phildelphia.

Posted by ami on 28 July 2011 - 08:58 PM

...Laviolette new to a dreesing room and my two top players, not to mention "leaders" choose not to participate, I would have cursed those two f***ers under my breath for sure.

don't you think, you (if you were Laviolette) should talk to your captain and alternate captain first and then come up publicly with that stupidest idea only if they are in?

#2198725 Blackhawks star Kane has fractured wrist

Posted by ami on 15 July 2011 - 03:44 PM

i bet another taxi driver was involved...

#2198524 Bettman threatens Edmonton.

Posted by ami on 14 July 2011 - 01:29 PM

government must stay out of it as far as possible.
it is a nice try on owners side to take advantage from socialistic-leaning government, though.

#2187649 No, No, NO! Jagr interested in Detroit.

Posted by ami on 21 June 2011 - 05:40 PM

And this affects his ability to play hockey, how???

Sound like you have personal issues with him, more than his ability to play hockey.

Edit: Fedorov lost over $40 million to a crooked investor. Is he an idiot? Possibly. Did it affect his ability to play the game? Not nearly as much as aging and injuries did.

loosing to a swindler and in online casino are quite different, don't you think?

what is affecting his ability to play hockey is his age, not being an idiot. But being an idiot may and probably will affect a locker room atmosphere.

#2187646 No, No, NO! Jagr interested in Detroit.

Posted by ami on 21 June 2011 - 05:36 PM

I dont know many player that but up 80 points in the KHL... Do you???

Radulov, 80 pts = 20+60, runner up has 66 points, Jags is on 10 place with 53 points.

Jagr's stat for the last 3 years in khl is right here: http://www.khl.ru/players/13851/
2008-09: 53 pts
2009-10: 42 pts
2010-11: 50 pts

Sure, it is not exactly bad. But this is KHL. As far as I remember Radulov was nowhere near the top scoring title in the NHL. His best was somewhat around 50 points.

If, god forbid, Jagr is signed, do not expect more that 20 points out of him. If he plays with Dats or Zeta, he's going to wear them up and expect their production to go down a little.

Well, in your scenario of 15+ points (which is laughable, but anyhow) at least they'll be paying Jagr less than Hudler to do the same thing... Jagr: TONS better option than keeping Hudler.

You can keep what you're smoking, I do not indulge.

last time I checked Hudler was still in a roster. Am I missing something here? who said he's gone once Jagr's signed?

I quit smoking 7 year ago. But there is a danger for me to start drinking heavily if Jarg signs with Red Wings :)

#2187638 No, No, NO! Jagr interested in Detroit.

Posted by ami on 21 June 2011 - 04:59 PM

oh yea.... Jagr will only have 15 points haha.... thats a joke... I feel if he puts up 30-40 points at 1.5 to 2 million we are getting our money worth.

I bet you felt the same about Modano.

Signing veteran star for one year contract worked once, with Dallas Drake.

I won't work with Jagr. Because he IS a has-been, he has already won everything. He has no real motivation, except (may be) his ego, which in my books does not even count.

He has not produced as expected in KHL he won't produce here.

and above all HE IS AN IDIOT. Anyone who's capable to lose somewhat hundreds of thousands in ONLINE casino is AN IDIOT. Period.

#2186526 Epic Boooing of Bettman

Posted by ami on 17 June 2011 - 01:05 PM

That's all bulls***, and your whole knowledge of lawyers has been shaped by TV and fantasy...

b/s or not, I was referring to the ability to sustain such a humiliation as one of the major requirements to be able to earn 6-digit paychecks being a lawyer.

In other words, a lawyer who has a sense of conscience and honor most likely wont be able to earn such paychecks.

As per my 'whole' knowledge. It's not wise to make such conclusions that fast.

#2186364 Epic Boooing of Bettman

Posted by ami on 17 June 2011 - 12:02 AM

he is a lawyer. these species can tolerate humiliation hundred times worse than those boo's when their single paycheck read six-digit number.

#2186361 No, No, NO! Jagr interested in Detroit.

Posted by ami on 16 June 2011 - 11:56 PM

Say hello...

check back when you are able to spell these lines correctly

#2186220 No, No, NO! Jagr interested in Detroit.

Posted by ami on 16 June 2011 - 02:02 PM

Just say NO!

He IS a has-been. and he IS an idiot!

We don't need idiots in this locker room.

#2177283 Bettman threatens Edmonton.

Posted by ami on 19 May 2011 - 01:59 PM

<...>It makes me mad that he has to say something like this. Don't get me wrong, if they want a new arena they should get one. However why does the NHL think it has the right to demand local governments to pay for their new toys???

He's a lawyer. That means chances he is a liberal are very high.
Then, if he's a liberal, then it is in his blood, government must help him, otherwise <...insert any threatening...>

get rid of this *******, the sooner, the better.

There is plenty to criticize Bettman on. This instance I feel is a major stretch. He's actually trying to help the Oilers, he's saying the same things he's said about the Islanders situation, he's not being any "harder" on Canadian teams, and to think that as a conspiracy is just, I don't know, not right? His job is to represent the owners, so of course he's going to battle for the "poor", if he wasn't good at his job he wouldn't be in his position for almost 20 years.

One word. Capitalism. Many seem to forget this simple word.

#2175165 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Sharks 3

Posted by ami on 13 May 2011 - 02:29 PM

Joe Thornton played his ass off <...>


Heatley played a great series in my book. He played responsible with the puck in his end and did a great job containing the neutral zone.

Marleau stepped-up large last night<...>

throw your book in trash can.

#2174309 Congratulations to the Sharks

Posted by ami on 12 May 2011 - 10:52 PM

f*** THE SHARKS guppies!! They're going to be swept again in CF!!

#2173065 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Sharks 3

Posted by ami on 12 May 2011 - 12:19 PM

... only a 1.8% chance to come back ...

No, chances were 12.5% - these are chances to win 3 games in a row, chances to win a series being down 0-3, is 6.25% .

1.8% is not chances, it is how many comebacks have happen so far.

Everything else is absolutely correct.


#2172547 700 Posts for a Sharks Game 7 Win

Posted by ami on 11 May 2011 - 02:49 PM

i'm still believing sharks can win 7-3 in second overtime.