Jump to content


Nightfall's Photo

Nightfall

Member Since 10 Dec 2003
Offline Last Active Nov 22 2014 10:52 PM
**---

#2512451 ECQF Game 2 GDT : Red Wings 1 at Bruins 4 - Series tied 1-1

Posted by Nightfall on 20 April 2014 - 03:51 PM

 

Remember a poster called Crymson?

 

Hell, 1/2 this forum is filled with fairweather fans.  Crymson is a realist.




#2512410 ECQF Game 2 GDT : Red Wings 1 at Bruins 4 - Series tied 1-1

Posted by Nightfall on 20 April 2014 - 03:45 PM

Awesome goal!  All aboard!

 

Bandwagon.jpg




#2511138 4/18 ECQF Game 1 GDT: Red Wings 1 @ Bruins 0. DET leads series 1-0

Posted by Nightfall on 18 April 2014 - 08:52 PM

Is Datsyuk wearing Harry Potter's invisibility cloak?  

 

Abracadabra!




#2511093 4/18 ECQF Game 1 GDT: Red Wings 1 @ Bruins 0. DET leads series 1-0

Posted by Nightfall on 18 April 2014 - 08:41 PM

Refs are doing a great job so far as well.  The players are going to decide the game.  Can't ask for anything better come playoff time.




#2511083 4/18 ECQF Game 1 GDT: Red Wings 1 @ Bruins 0. DET leads series 1-0

Posted by Nightfall on 18 April 2014 - 08:37 PM

This really is classic playoff hockey.  Big stops at both ends.  Fast and physical game.  I love it.




#2501584 Net off the moorings question

Posted by Nightfall on 26 March 2014 - 08:14 AM

The rule states smith has to push it off deliberately or accidentally, smith did not do that. It says nothing about pushing a player into the net. This is where the NHL leaves the rule open for interpretation. Make it black or white. By that rule smith did nothing wrong.

 

The rule does state that.

 

"the goal post must have been displaced by the actions of a defending player or goalkeeper"

 

Was the goal posts displaced?  Yes

Was it due to the actions of Smith?  Yes.  That player that had an easy tap in wasn't going to knock the net off himself just standing there.


Watch the replay again. The net comes up off the mooring before he starts the shot. He has the stick back for the puck when it first comes off but it hasn't started moving forward yet. No goal.

 

After Smith pushes him into the net.  Smith doesn't do that, its an easy tap in goal.  The goal as imminent, and Smith's actions caused the net to go off its moorings.  Once again, good goal.




#2501581 3/25 GDT - Red Wings 2 at Blue Jackets 4

Posted by Nightfall on 26 March 2014 - 07:52 AM

 

For real? In a league where poor officiating is the standard, tonight somehow topped that. They called everything for 10 minutes, nothing the rest of the way except for that "slash" (which wasn't) on Legwand. The refs were a disaster. 

 

I won't get into a debate on what the refs called.  That never ends well, and as a referee myself, I am a bit more understanding than the common Wings fan.  Lets put it this way.....

 

The refs were not the reason why the Wings lost that game.  I don't necessarily agree with all the calls in the course of the game.  What I do believe is that good teams find a way to get the job done.  The Wings were not the better team tonight and I feel they made more mistakes than Columbus did.




#2501578 Net off the moorings question

Posted by Nightfall on 26 March 2014 - 07:38 AM

I thought it was a good call.  The rule 63.6 states....

 

http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26355

 

In the event that the goal post is displaced, either deliberately or accidentally, by a defending player, prior to the puck crossing the goal line between the normal position of the goalposts, the Referee may award a goal.

 

In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have been displaced by the actions a defending player or goalkeeper, the puck must have been shot (or the player must be in the act of shooting) at the goal prior to the goal post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.

 

 

IMHO, a goal was imminent.  The player had position, and he was going to have an easy tap in goal.  Smith pushed him into the net and therefore caused the net to be dislodged.  It really is a no brainer call in my opinion.




#2500990 3/25 GDT - Red Wings 2 at Blue Jackets 4

Posted by Nightfall on 25 March 2014 - 07:19 PM

Columbus scores 2 and I swear half the forum members were on their way out.

 

Detroit scores to bring it within 1 and everyone comes back.

 

Less drama ladies!




#2496790 Maple Leafs 2 @ Red Wings 3

Posted by Nightfall on 18 March 2014 - 07:54 PM

Goaltending is a major problem for us.  We really need that elite goalie.

 

/sarcasm

 

Seriously, if we had a full team, we would be in great shape.




#2494716 3/11 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blue Jackets 4

Posted by Nightfall on 11 March 2014 - 11:09 PM

At the end of the day I love this franchise bc we always go to the playoffs. We piss excellence. If we don't make it I'll still be a diehard fan, but it will be hard to take the "streak is over" bs from the media and other fans. We've always been a prime target for haters, and I dread the day they have ammo.

 

Everything that has a beginning has an end.  The streak will end eventually.  I know I never want it to end either, but it will.




#2494639 3/11 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blue Jackets 4

Posted by Nightfall on 11 March 2014 - 08:38 PM

The lack of faith and support for our team in this forum is just insane.  Just shows how spoiled we really are.  The Wings have made the playoffs for as long as I have been a fan, and if they miss out this year, then I am not bailing on them.  I fail to see why some here are willing to give up, bash the team, and insult the management.  Support your team, through thick and thin.  Its what supporting a team is all about. 

 

As for the game tonight, the Blue Jackets should be commended.  They came through with a win when they needed it.

 

As for the Wings, they have 18 more games to fight their way into the post season.




#2491043 Legwand to Detroit for Eaves, Jarnkrok + cond 3rd/2nd

Posted by Nightfall on 05 March 2014 - 05:21 PM

So than why give up so much for someone that's not even worth it... IMO eaves and a 2nd shoulda been enough

 

If Legwand signs here, it was a great deal for the Wings.  If he doesn't, it was a waste, Thats the stance I am making.




#2491018 Legwand to Detroit for Eaves, Jarnkrok + cond 3rd/2nd

Posted by Nightfall on 05 March 2014 - 05:11 PM

I don't get it either and I don't see how people can say he will be useful to us in next 3 years...

 

I don't see how people can say with certainty that Jarnkrok won't be the useful to us in the next 3 years either. 




#2490940 Legwand to Detroit for Eaves, Jarnkrok + cond 3rd/2nd

Posted by Nightfall on 05 March 2014 - 04:51 PM

Well we got s*** and gave up possible stars...

 

Have anything to backup that statement and continue the discussion or you going to keep talking out of your ass?

 

IMHO, Legwand is a proven NHL player, and not crap.  Maybe you could explain why you consider Legwand to be crap.