Jump to content

Nightfall's Photo


Member Since 10 Dec 2003
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 08:07 PM

#2214946 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:40 PM

What about an Ovechtrick?

I would rather see a Dats-a-trick.

With all this ridiculous downtime the team has, I'd like to see them working on PPs and face-offs, since they're both rather on the mediocre side to start the season.

They said at the start of the game that they have been working more on special teams and power plays. Really not much they can do other than keep up the effort. I believe that the power play will come around.

#2214941 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:37 PM

I'm thinking when the first loss comes, it's officially the end of the season. The bandwagon fleas begin to fall off.

Haha, true story. I still remember when a friend of mine who is a Tampa Bay Lightning fan had season tickets during all those crappy years. Everyone who showed up to the games were real Tampa Bay fans. Then, the team got good and won the Cup. He said that the cup winning year was fun, but all the bandwagon fans jumped on. When they regressed, it went back to the way it was. Now with the team getting good again, the bandwagoners have returned.

Personally, I would rather have a good team and deal with the bandwagoners than have a crappy team and no bandwagon fans. Ask the Lions fans how they have felt the last 8 years.

Character assassination won't do you any good, sweetcheeks.

You don't have any character left to assassinate. So it was a fruitless effort. :D

#2214924 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:31 PM

Smartass comment deserves a smartass response. Guess you shouldn't have asked.

Actually it was a dumbass making an assumption that lead to a smartass comment that deserved a smartass response. Get it right next time. :D

#2214896 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:27 PM

Yes. Then I'd have to kill you. Still want to know?

Nah, I am not that desperate.

#2214880 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:21 PM

I guarantee you we've won many, many games where it was a matter of the refs making a bad call against the other teams that gave us that little extra *something*, and I can also guarantee that you didn't give a damn, you were just happy that we won, like every other fan.

How great you must be....to know how certain people think and feel. Can you tell me your secret?

#2214833 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:10 PM

Who cares if that's a s***ty call? It benefits us. Be pissed off if it was a s***ty call against us.

Yup, the refs suck if they make a s***ty call against us. Yet they are fine if they make a s***ty call for us. <_<

#2214828 10/13 GDT: Canucks 0 at Red Wings 2

Posted by Nightfall on 13 October 2011 - 09:09 PM

Vancouver will be getting a makeup call before the end of the game. That penalty on them was horrible.

#2213189 10/7 GDT:Senators 3 at Red Wings 5

Posted by Nightfall on 07 October 2011 - 07:48 PM

nope...that's what you're doing. I didn't mention being swept or not making the playoffs. You're reading way too much into this.

Players always seem to say it takes a lot out of them when they have deep runs into the playoffs, I was simply stating that maybe we might be fresh this year (as opposed to the last two) since we didn't have deep runs. Like I said, you totally read too much into my "faulty" statement.

no worries though.

Maybe you are right that I am reading too much into it. Just based on what you said....

Personally, I believe its a bullcrap excuse. Especially since the Wings have been through two finals appearances and two second round appearances in the last 4 years. These guys are the best conditioned athletes in hockey. So I will disagree with it. :D

Now, if you believe the wings have a fragile psyche or they aren't conditioned for the work, then you are right in your mind. I believe the opposite.

#2211939 Brunnstrom is signed.

Posted by Nightfall on 03 October 2011 - 03:42 PM

He actually signed a 2 way deal so if he goes down to the AHL, he will avoid having to pass through waivers. This is a great deal for both the Wings and Brunnstrom.

#2211485 No-touch icing

Posted by Nightfall on 01 October 2011 - 09:57 PM

The first hockey I really enjoyed was college hockey. I was used to no touch icing by the time I started watching the NHL about 4 months later. I really tried to understand what the benefit was to having touch icing. Yes, there are races for the puck and sometimes icing is negated. There are some times when someone gets shoved from behind or goes into the board awkward during the race causing injury. I firmly believe the risk of injury is not worth the races for the puck. We have already seen a couple injuries because of races for the puck in the preseason. I really don't want to see any player risk injury like that.

Just my .02 cents.

#2205642 I could have made it to the NHL!

Posted by Nightfall on 31 August 2011 - 03:26 PM

I could have made it to the NHL if....

I started playing hockey when I was 5 years old instead of waiting until I was 27.

#2205009 Training Camp Cuts

Posted by Nightfall on 24 August 2011 - 09:09 AM

i feel bad for smith. he is great in interviews saying 'yeah my goal is to make the team but if i spend another year in grand rapids that's fine, too.' but you know inside he is going mental.

i want to see this kid play really bad, and i hate that he's just getting older in GR as he has proven that he is NHL ready.

on the other hand i want commodore's attitude and toughness in the lineup, and with the *shudders* imminent departure of our captain he will get more ice-time in the future than he would now, and he can log a ton in GR gaining experience and honing his defensive skills. of course this has all been said to death.

As someone who has watched Smith in Grand Rapids last season (I had season tickets last year and went to 34 games), I can tell you that he needs another season in Grand Rapids as a top line defenseman. Now, if he can get partnered with Nick and play first line minutes in Detroit, that would be fine with me as well. The experience of playing with Nick could go a long way to helping his career. What I don't want to see is Smith playing 3rd line minutes in Detroit. He needs a bit more experience. For as gifted as he is, there are people here that would lambaste the guy because he would be a lot like Rafalski. He is a offensive defenseman and can make some mistakes when it comes to pinching in on the boards or trying to make a play.

#2204017 The NHL Changes Proposed For Overtime.

Posted by Nightfall on 16 August 2011 - 01:46 PM

am i the only person here who actually doesnt mind the shoot out? i mean its the best option in my eyes to end a regular season game with excitement without dragging the game on where either people may leave or perhaps a player gets injured. Im good with the shoot outs in the regular season. Maybe a small addendum to the current role, play one 10 minute OT and then shoot out? is this being tossed around? no silly 3-3 to 2-2 , just 5-5 hockey , and if it gets past the 10 minute OT, give me the shoot out.

I am a big fan of the shootout as well. At the same time, I would rather see a 4v4 5 minute OT followed by a 5 minute 3v3 OT. In some games 5v5 isn't going to cut it. I believe that a 4v4 is more exciting and a 3v3 would be even more exciting to watch. Just my .02 cents.

#2201272 Dry Island: The Flyers of Phildelphia.

Posted by Nightfall on 27 July 2011 - 02:43 PM

This has to be the dumbest story I have ever heard. I really think someone has to be trying to make a mountain out of a molehill here. Its not like these guys are party animals and giving the club a bad name. There is no fire here. Heck, there isn't even any smoke here. What we have is someone said something, and the press is taking off with it. To make matters worse, the press isn't even looking at the validity of the story.

#2200991 Report: Gary Bettman makes $7.5M

Posted by Nightfall on 25 July 2011 - 10:06 PM

The owners all like the job he is doing. I say good for him. I just hope that there isn't a lockout when the CBA expires. We don't need another debacle like we had last time the CBA expired.