Jump to content


Nightfall's Photo

Nightfall

Member Since 10 Dec 2003
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 07:47 PM
**---

#2421263 Grand Rapids Griffins Win Calder Cup! 5-2 win in game 6

Posted by Nightfall on 21 June 2013 - 06:54 PM

Blashill is expecting to be with the Griffins next year.  To that I say, thank god.  He is the best coach Grand Rapids has had in years.  I fully expect our prospects to be better so long as we have a good coach and good developmental people such as Chelios, Maltby, Draper, and Osgood at the helm.




#2420667 Grand Rapids Griffins Win Calder Cup! 5-2 win in game 6

Posted by Nightfall on 18 June 2013 - 08:14 PM

These announcers suck

 

Turn on WoodRadio streaming like I did.  I hear the future and then watch the past as another poster here is doing.  :)

 

Griffins in front 3-2 on a screened shot from the point.  Looked like a similar shot that beat Mrazek to tie the game.




#2420268 Visors Required - New NHL Players in '13-'14

Posted by Nightfall on 17 June 2013 - 01:47 PM

 

because we are talking about perfectly trained adults here, they are the players and I would guess that they now exactly what is best for them and what is not.

 

This is just like people saying that they want a no helmet law when it comes to riding a motorcycle.  These perfectly intelligent and trained adults know the risks.  So there should a no helmet law right?  If someone gets into an accident and has a head injury which puts them in a care facility for the rest of their lives, they will be going after the insurance company, the driver, the state, and everyone else they can get money from.

 

The problem is that these hockey players are going to be fine with it until one of them takes a stick to the eye and then their career comes to an abrupt end.  Like Manny Malhotra who has played in 9 games since his eye injury and it looks like his career is finished.  He is going to get as much from NHL disability as he can.

 

There are times when people must be protected from themselves.  Just like people should be forced to wear a helmet when they ride a motorcycle, players should be told to wear visors.  They aren't growing eyeballs in petri dishes, and all it takes is one stick to end your career.  I think that visors, like helmets in the past, should be grandfathered in.




#2405610 WCSF Game 1 GDT : Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 4, (CHI leads series 1-0)

Posted by Nightfall on 15 May 2013 - 09:30 PM

Wings are getting outshot 40-17.  Hawks the hungrier team by far.




#2405333 WCSF Game 1 GDT : Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 4, (CHI leads series 1-0)

Posted by Nightfall on 15 May 2013 - 08:26 PM

Griffins win to take a 2-1 series lead over Toronto.

 

Griffins have 4 and 5 at home on Friday and Saturday.




#2404119 Any tips on ways to tolerate the NBC media?

Posted by Nightfall on 13 May 2013 - 07:19 PM

It's the fans listening that are biased, not the announcers. 

 

By and large, I think the NBC crew does a nice job.  Ken Kal sounds like a cartoon character and why Paul uh, Woods, uh, has uh, a job, uh in broadcasting, uh, is beyond me.

 

There is some truth to this, but I know that Eddie is pretty badly for the Hawks and has a hard time being impartial.




#2403824 WCSF - (1) Chicago Blackhawks vs. (7) Detroit Red Wings

Posted by Nightfall on 13 May 2013 - 07:52 AM

Hawks take this one pretty easily in 5 games.

 

Well, after you called the series over when the Ducks went up 3-2, I can definitely say you are no Nostradamus.  :D

 

I am picking the Hawks in 7, but that is because they are rolling right now.  The Wings will get a couple wins just from sheer will and determination.  In the end though, Chicago is just that good.



The Blackhawks don't scare me.  I think we could take them under most circumstances, but the deck is severely stacked against us considering how the first round went for both teams.  Chicago had virtually no travel, won in 5 games and is going to be well rested.  Oh yeah, they have home ice and the best record in the league too.  Meanwhile, we've been flying back and forth across the country over and over again in a hard fought, OT filled, 7 game series against the Ducks.  

 

It would make my season if we knocked out the Hawks, but I have a hard time seeing it happen.

 

This right here!




#2400757 Alberta Peewee Hockey Bans Body Checking

Posted by Nightfall on 09 May 2013 - 08:35 PM

I have been refereeing for a number of years now and I have done everything from Peewee all the way up to Varsity hockey in West Michigan.  In that time, I have seen a number of rule changes.  When they announced that they were removing checking from Peewee hockey, I was a supporter and still am today.  For a number of PW teams and players, they are still learning the fundamentals of hockey.  You had a number of players who were just out to hit and didn't have the basic skills down.  Eliminating checking in PW hockey really helped the development of these kids.  Now, two years after the rule was put in place, it really has improved the passing and chemistry of these games.  Bantam hockey is a much better product because the kids are not only able to pass and shoot better, but the hitting is still there in that aspect of the game.

 

Now, some people think that no hitting means no contact.  There is still contact, but its all about intent.  For instance, if you have to players going shoulder to shoulder into the corner to play the puck, using your size and strength to get the puck is allowed.  You can't body check someone out of the way, but you can contact the other player and use your size and strength for body positioning.

 

I know some people here are saying "No hit league" and that the rule sucks, but this is something that most hockey parents, refs, and coaches really like. 




#2400747 former Red Wings stars join rec-leaguers for game

Posted by Nightfall on 09 May 2013 - 08:25 PM

I played in a charity event against the Red Wings Alumni back in 2003 and that was awesome.  This experience would be just as fun IMHO.  I would love my rec hockey team to have an experience like this.




#2400488 WCQF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 2 @ Ducks 3 (OT) - (ANA leads series 3-2)

Posted by Nightfall on 09 May 2013 - 12:12 AM

 

LOL.

 

You never stop trolling with this bandwagon crap do you?  

 

Sharks bus?

 

Just as the negative nancys never stop with calling a series lost after their team goes down 3-2.  Adversity is what makes sports great.  I certainly wish I could crap all over the Wings when they go down in a series or lose a game, but I just can't do it.




#2400441 WCQF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 2 @ Ducks 3 (OT) - (ANA leads series 3-2)

Posted by Nightfall on 09 May 2013 - 12:05 AM

it's been a good series, Detroit.

 

I am sure you were saying the opposite when Detroit beat Pittsburgh in the 09 cup finals to take a 3-2 series lead.  Oh wait, Pittsburgh won game 6 at home and 7 on Detroit ice to win the cup.  Nevermind.....

 

Gut check time for Detroit.  We will see how they react in game 6.




#2400326 WCQF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 2 @ Ducks 3 (OT) - (ANA leads series 3-2)

Posted by Nightfall on 08 May 2013 - 11:33 PM

I have to commend the refs.  They are letting the players play.  Especially with all the falling that is going on out there.




#2400294 WCQF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 2 @ Ducks 3 (OT) - (ANA leads series 3-2)

Posted by Nightfall on 08 May 2013 - 11:23 PM

Ref waved it off, but I could see that counting under review.

 

That looked good to me as well.  Lets put it this way, if the roles were reversed, Wings fans would be bitching about it.  We pushed the player into the net and that could have been a good goal.




#2400206 WCQF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 2 @ Ducks 3 (OT) - (ANA leads series 3-2)

Posted by Nightfall on 08 May 2013 - 10:51 PM

That might be the series there.

 

Blowing so many good chances to put them away, and now it's a tied game.  

 

Series tied 2-2 and we are calling the series on a tie game in game 5 at the end of the second period?  Please.....




#2399934 WCQF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 2 @ Ducks 3 (OT) - (ANA leads series 3-2)

Posted by Nightfall on 08 May 2013 - 09:56 PM

 

You have to win the faceoff first.  

 

Yup, they have won 2x more faceoffs than we have.  Thats not good.