Jump to content


haroldsnepsts's Photo

haroldsnepsts

Member Since 11 Feb 2004
Offline Last Active Today, 10:29 AM
***--

#2266675 3/4 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 04 March 2012 - 07:24 PM

And that psuedo genius behind the bench certainly doesn't help matters. Certainly not the best motivational coach and very far from an inspirational leader. Totally opposite from Bowman.

His career as an nhl coach is 405-203. He was third fastest to the 400 win mark of any NHL coach. He has a playoff record of 63-39.

In his 8 seasons as an NHL coach, he's gotten his team to the Stanley Cup finals three times, won once. Conference finals once.
  • Nev likes this


#2266645 3/4 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 04 March 2012 - 06:47 PM

Once again, I don't remember Chicago being on the ropes in this game. Emery didn't have to stand on his head. That's what I would call outplaying a team soundly and dominating them.

It was a pretty even game, but Chicago seemed to have more odd man rushes and a better 3rd period. I figured the home ice and all the powerplays would eventually help Detroit. It didn't.

They didn't have them on the ropes, but I think the Wings were dictating play through much of the game. They may not have been lighting Emery up, but they were definitely limiting the scoring chances by the Hawks and rang multiple shots of the posts. That started to fall apart a bit in the third, but I'm sure the shorthanded defense had something to do with that.


#2266571 3/4 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 04 March 2012 - 05:59 PM

where did i say it didn't count?

ok, it apparently isn't satisfying enough for you since you were whining about it.


#2266553 3/4 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 04 March 2012 - 05:52 PM

the hawks are going to go to 3-0-2 against the wings? seriously?

embarrassing.

The Wings won twice in OT, not a shootout.

How about not fighting and just allow the opposing player to beat you up so you get a 5 minute powerplay?

Because that never actually happens.

Maaaaybe he'd get two for roughing, but you never get 5 for fighting when the other guy doesn't drop the gloves too.

Plus then you'd probably just complain about Smith turtling.


#2266322 Brad Stuart's family issues

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 04 March 2012 - 01:35 PM

You have yet to use any substance to back up your arguments. All you can say is " ZOMG , HE IS WRONG" and start lighting the torches.

The tennis reference is referring to the fact that you are outright wrong when you said some poster knows more about my decision making than I might know about some of our beloved red wings.

The logic is simple...

You really think Brad would retire if it was Detroit or nothing? While he was still a top 4 defensemen?

Hell if it is all about family... why doesn't he just hang em up now? He's made more money than 99 percent of people will make in a lifetime. Why re-sign in Detroit in 2008? I thought family was first??

As for Rafalski, he retired because his body could no longer handle the game. If he was so concerned with god and his family, why didn't he just retire after his first pay day, and live off of that being god's missionary and spend every day with his family? Wanna guess why?

Green makes the world go round. I don't know what fairy tale land you live in.

Your argument is basically that you know what is going on in the personal lives of people you don't even know, so I don't need a ton of substance to refute such a badly flawed argument. You can make guesses and assumptions about what their motivations are, but they're just that. Guesses and assumptions.

Green may make your world go round, but here's a little secret. You don't speak for everyone. People from all walks of life chose more important things than money.

More on topic, it's seeming more and more that Stuart is gone. He was a great pickup and will be missed. Hopefully he's a beast this playoffs if it's his last one in the winged wheel.


#2266288 Brad Stuart's family issues

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 04 March 2012 - 11:36 AM

My point is that you were trying to say some random poster knows as much about me as I, or anyone else who closely follows the wings, could gather up about a famous person who's private matters are paraded all over tv, newspapers, and this message board.

Case and point:

Anyone who has read this thread knows infinitely more about Brad Stuart's personal life than anyone here knows about mine COMBINED.

Point. Set. Match.

:rolleyes:

I love it when people say things like that. As if they've "won" some argument or made some brilliant point.

The reality is, you actually don't know jack about Lidstrom's personal life. You may know how much money he makes, even where he lives. But there's no way you could possibly know his mindset as he's deciding what to do with his life and his family. Yet you acted as if it were fact it was all about the money.

Same with Stuart. It's easy to sit back and judge people when you have no idea what is actually going on in their lives. Do you really not understand the difference between people speculating about someone's personal situation, and how their personal life actually is?

BOOM! *throws the mic down and walks off stage, hands over his head in victory*

I appreciate your well wishes in my own affairs, but you are viewing our heros in a god-like light.

While I am a longtime fan of our beloved team, I know that they are hardly models of wholesome family values. All of these players have chosen career over family...right or wrong. I am in no way judging as my own career is very dear to me.

Lidstrom, as well as any pro in any sport will play as long as their bodies allow them and they are earning the big bucks.I doubt any capable pro in any league would ever stop playing and earn a commoner's wage for the sake of "family." Its all about that green. And all of the trophy wives sitting in the stands know that.

I am sure if Detroit was the only team to offer Stuart a contract, he would be here, rather than retire and play Daddy. I would also bet that if Kenny threw Stu a few extra mil, he'd take the money.

If someone was willing to double or triple your income at a job you love, im sure you would make that oh so gut wrenching decision to move your family.


Edit: grammar

Just wanted to highlight all the bad assumptions in your post.

Pro athletes are certainly human and have faults like the rest of us. But that doesn't necessarily mean they all fit your bitter jaded view of them either.


#2266188 Brad Stuart's family issues

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 03 March 2012 - 08:28 PM

Now you are just reaching far beyond logic here.

Get off your high moral ground before it caves in around you.

reaching beyond logic?

In what universe do you know anything about what is going on in Lidstrom's family life?

You made a huge assumption on what Lidstrom's true intentions were, based on very little information. My logic is solid.


#2266182 Brad Stuart's family issues

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 03 March 2012 - 07:37 PM

Spoken like a guy who couldnt possibly know any less about this "guy."

Take your personal attacks and pure ignorance elsewhere.

He probably knows as much about your personal situation and job choices as you do Lidstrom's.


#2266122 Brendan Smith watch thread

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 03 March 2012 - 01:55 PM

Lidstrom's steady, intelligent play is missed. Ericsson's boneheadedness is not.

:rolleyes:

He said the defense was better without Ericsson. Lidstrom has been out both of those games as well.

But I guess this isn't just more baseless Ericsson bashing and you can somehow determine that the defense actually looks better overall specifically because of Ericsson's absence and not Lidstrom's?

It used to be that Kindl>Ericsson, which was wrong. Ericsson clearly outplayed Kindl, who couldn't hold his spot in the lineup over Commie. When that became obvious, you guys shifted to complaining about Ericsson's contract. Now that he's out of the lineup, somehow you can tell the defense is better specifically because of his absence.

You guys hate him. That's fine. Certain players are just going to get bashed. But it's not about what's actually happening on the ice, it's silly to pretend otherwise.


As for Smith, I'm glad he's finally getting some playing time. I know it's probably for the best, but Holland's "overly ripe"philosophy can be frustrating. I can't wait until this kids a regular in the lineup.


#2266112 Devin Setoguchi

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 03 March 2012 - 12:48 PM

This is the best one I've ever seen!

Wideman's is pretty amazing. He didn't just fall down, he managed to knock himself off his feet somehow. It's as if he got checked by a ghost or something.


#2266111 3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 03 March 2012 - 12:42 PM

I like how the headlines say the Wings ended the home losing skid. I guess after 23 games in a row, two home losses is a "skid." :lol:


#2266109 Brendan Smith watch thread

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 03 March 2012 - 12:35 PM

The defense looks way better without Ericsson.

And Lidstrom apparently? They've been out of the lineup the exact same games.

We should get rid of both of them.


#2265673 Quincey Return to Lineup,

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 02 March 2012 - 12:53 PM

Any of them are better than Error-son.

I was skeptical about Quincey at first, but I've liked his play thus far.

That's about as clever as the people who used to say Osbad.

Ericsson is better than both Janik and Kindl. I agree with what this guy said about E:

I must say, I've seen a dramatic improvement in Ericsson the last few months. He's getting more physical without being stupid and is making less mistakes. If he keeps this up I might start finding him acceptable.

Keep it up Big E.



Quincey is a nice addition though he makes Kindl even more expendable.


#2265516 Current standings

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 01 March 2012 - 07:44 PM

I've removed all posts related to personal attacks and ones that did nothing but criticize another member instead of responding to the content of their message.

Please keep the discussion relevant to the topic at hand (standings, schedule, etc). Thanks.


#2265406 Brad Stuart's family issues

Posted by haroldsnepsts on 01 March 2012 - 12:41 PM

I certainly remember the stories claiming he was "reconsidering" the possibility of moving to Sweden. He has done that for as long as he has been earning the larger contracts. Every contract year I have heard stories about this.

It wasn't every contract year.

I'm not saying there weren't stories of this. I remember it too. But you're assuming it's purely a ploy for more money and not a legitimate consideration of taking his family and raising his kids back in his native Sweden.