Jump to content


Dabura's Photo

Dabura

Member Since 27 Feb 2004
Offline Last Active Private
***--

#2523836 Mike Green

Posted by Dabura on 14 June 2014 - 12:17 PM

No chance the wings would take him.  It would be like Carlo Colaiacovo all over again.

 

Colaiacovo's a depth defenseman, and we threw him onto a makeshift, hope-and-pray blue line. Green, at his best, is a top-end talent, a difference-maker. A defensive black hole, yes, but the guy can move the puck and score, especially on the power play. Outside of Kronwall and maaaaaaybe Smith, we don't have a guy like that on the back end, and that's a big, big issue. Maybe one of our kids becomes as valuable as Green, but that's a huge maybe, and Datsyuk would be gone by then anyway.

 

If we're going to acquire a top-end, difference-making top-four defenseman, it's very likely going to be someone who's a good deal less than ideal. Otherwise, we wouldn't have a shot at him in the first place. Ideal players don't get moved or allowed to hit the UFA market.

 

I'd like Green at a reasonable price.




#2523775 Report: NHL to have 5 outdoor games in 2014-15.

Posted by Dabura on 14 June 2014 - 01:09 AM

Gary Bettman is hot.




#2523730 2014 SCF : (2) The Big Apple vs. (3) Hollywood

Posted by Dabura on 13 June 2014 - 07:03 PM

CANNOT BE UNSEEN

 

HUNGER GAMES CHAMPIONS 2014

 

Also, Anton Stralman is secretly a Kronwall. He looks and talks and - with all these big hits he's throwing - plays like Nik. It's a little eerie.


It'd be really funny if the Rangers win the Cup. All the odds-defying history-making stuff the Kings have done. And then the Rangers come back from 3-0 and beat them for the Cup. And it's remembered as the greatest SCF ever.




#2523649 Trading up?

Posted by Dabura on 12 June 2014 - 08:04 PM

The thing about this possibility is, as far as I can tell, it's totally doable. We wouldn't have to sell the farm, or ship out Z or D. We'd probably just have to move Ericsson (Tallon wants a big-bodied top-four defenseman), a pick, and a prospect. For Aaron Ekblad? I would do that. But that's just me.




#2523646 Trading up?

Posted by Dabura on 12 June 2014 - 07:45 PM

Niklas Kronwall  Aaron Ekblad

Danny DeKeyser  Anton Stralman

Don't Know  What Evz

Who Cares

 

It's so beautiful.




#2523643 Spezza Requests Trade

Posted by Dabura on 12 June 2014 - 07:33 PM

I don't want Spezza on this team, but this plus minus talk is silly.  You can't use his -26 this year against him and then fail to give him credit for his career +53.  He's got a better career plus minus than Mike Richards, who was a finalist for the Selke Trophy. 

 

Either it's a terrible stat and shouldn't be used at all, or it's a good enough stat which has to be used to validate a player just as much as it's used to denigrate them. 

 

Personally, I don't think Spezza's a great defensive player.  BUT, he's better than his -26 indicated this season, and he's probably worse than his career high +26 indicates as well. 

 

It's a limited stat. That's how I think of it. It can tell you something, but, generally, don't take it at face value. Case in point: Jason Spezza this season. The Sens sucked this season. (Apologies to the resident Sens fan.) They absolutely leaked goals. Neither of their goalies could stop a beach ball. And yet, Spezza was, I think (haven't formally checked), about a point-per-game player. So, on the second line of a defensively responsible team like the Wings? I tend to think he'd be a difference-maker, without having the baggage of a captaincy and being The Guy. If I'm Spezza, that's what I want.

 

What happened to the Ducks? I thought they were in on him? That'd be an interesting match.


Francine straight up for  Spezza I would do in an  instant. Toss in  Kindl if needed.

 

Take away the 15 goals Franzen's going to score against the Sens every season and they become a playoff team. :lol:




#2523314 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by Dabura on 09 June 2014 - 05:27 PM

Why?

 

If you sign a veteran back-up, you have P-mraz ready when both goalies inevitably get hurt. If Mrazek's your back-up, you have McCollum or Paterson in GRs. You want to call one of those guys up to start a game in the NHL?

 

Same goes for the defence. Leave those kids in GRs as long as you can. How awesome is it that if any D-men get hurt, you can depend on Ouellet, Backman, Marchenko, and Sproul to be legit quality replacements?

 

Well, full disclosure: I'm biased. I really like Mrazek, a lot. I think he's good enough right now to be a starter in the NHL. I'd like to see him make his case for being our #1.




#2523306 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by Dabura on 09 June 2014 - 11:03 AM

Brodeur hasn't been good for years now.  Even as a backup I don't see the point in bringing him here.

 

Honestly, I'd rather Mrazek get the backup job.  Goalies can't just jump into the starting role, and they all have to backup at some point.  So the AHL argument about "getting experience" doesn't really hold in this case.  Better for him to get 30 games in the NHL than 60 in the AHL at this point.

 

I say bring Mrazek up and give him every opportunity to steal the starting job from Howard. I don't care if Kenny was brough up too soon and it scarred him for life and now he's trying to protect this young goalie or whatever. Mrazek is awesome.




#2523290 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by Dabura on 08 June 2014 - 09:20 PM

Two top six forwards more important. For now and down the road.

 

Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Weiss, Franzen, Nyquist, Tatar, Jurco, Sheahan, Mantha, Alfredsson, Athanasiou...

 

We need a top-four defenseman like whoa.




#2523276 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by Dabura on 08 June 2014 - 05:04 PM

If we sign Brodeur, I will riot.




#2523174 2014 SCF : (2) The Big Apple vs. (3) Hollywood

Posted by Dabura on 07 June 2014 - 07:14 PM

I said Rangers in seven. The way the series has gone thus far, I think it's a real possibility.




#2523048 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by Dabura on 06 June 2014 - 04:53 PM

It's almost like there's this cosmic plan unfolding. That the universe has "course-corrected" so that we can not only acquire a top-four defenseman, but do so comfortably. Think about it. The unreal number of injuries revealing four top-six-worthy kids in Nyquist, Tatar, Sheahan, Jurco. Nyquist setting the world on fire. The kid line turning heads. Mantha - the kind of prospect any GM would kill for - being handed to us on a silver platter and then silencing his critics with a monster season. The six young NHL-ready defensemen, all of whom are looking like former first-round picks. Tyler Bertuzzi having the season he had. Glendening showing his mettle against Stamkos and Crosby. Athanasiou looking like a potential top-sixer. Pulkkinen tearing it up for the Griffins. DeKeyser choosing the Wings. A team like, I dunno, the Sens would probably love to have Andersson or Almqvist or Callahan or Ferraro.

 

Full credit to Team Holland on this front. Having this many promising young assets while always making the playoffs and never picking in the top twelve and never rebuilding - it's incredible, absolutely incredible. But my point is, it almost seems too perfect, doesn't it? It's like this had to happen. Is there perhaps some defenseman out there who's supposed to become a Wing and help lead us to glory? Or is the idea that we truly have all we need, and those special players - say, Ouellet and Pulkkinen - are going to rise to the surface this season and turn us into a contender?

 

Maybe I have it backwards with my Holland bashing. Maybe the bold, risky course of action is pushing for that one last Cup for Datsyuk using only what we have. I guess the argument could be made that anyone can pull off a trade, but not just anyone can amass the kind of young talent we have in our system. Hmmm.




#2523030 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by Dabura on 06 June 2014 - 02:05 PM

To be clear, I'm not saying we need to sign Dan Boyle. Even if he's game for a two-year deal with us (not likely), I believe we can do better. That's where I really agree with you, kip. We can do better, at least in theory. We have tons of assets. We have about as much cap space as we're ever going to have (because this is about as close to rebuilding as we're going to get). We can get that top-four defenseman on the right side of 30.

 

I get wanting to hold on to your prospects, but we're looking at a logjam anyway. Kindl, Lashoff, Almqvist, Ouellet, Sproul, Marchenko, Backman, Jensen, maybe even Smith - these guys are competing for, at absolute most, three spots.




#2522992 Dan Boyle's rights traded to the Islanders…..

Posted by Dabura on 06 June 2014 - 10:46 AM

The best argument against signing Boyle for more than one season is that, barring injury, only one of our kids is going to get a legitimate shot over that span of time, assuming Smith isn't traded. I can respect that. At the same time, you have to weigh it against pushing for the Cup. It's not that I don't think we can push for the Cup with a couple of kids on the back end. I just think it's unlikely, versus what we might get from a  name talent. Yeah, Boyle isn't the player he once was, but he's still valuable.




#2522950 Dan Boyle's rights traded to the Islanders…..

Posted by Dabura on 05 June 2014 - 08:36 PM

Oh, plz.

 

The Wings aren't on the same level as the Sharks. We could really use a Dan Boyle. How does having him on the second pairing for a couple years hurt us? Are we that high on our kids that we feel we need Ouellet and Marchenko taking the hypothetical two spots available or we're not going to be able to compete for the Cup?

 

Kronwall, Ericsson, DeKeyser, Smith, a kid, someone from the outside. That's probably what our blue line should look like next season. If that someone from the outside is Dan Boyle, that's not a bad thing. If he falters, he gets hurt - then guess what: we can bring up a kid. Win-win.