Jump to content

vladdy16's Photo


Member Since 12 Mar 2004
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 10:00 PM

#2280336 Money On The Board - Playoff Style

Posted by vladdy16 on 08 April 2012 - 04:22 PM

You guys have certainly set the bar pretty high. I haven't quite figured out what my pledge is going to be yet, but it certainly won't be quite so grand as the rest of you. I don't feel bad about that, and no one else should either. Ilitch Charities will appreciate whatever we send.

Scott brings up a good point - some people don't have Paypal. I will be happy to accept other methods of payment.

#2280101 Wings meet Preds in First Round

Posted by vladdy16 on 08 April 2012 - 12:34 AM

Forgive me if I think we have earned some respect that were not receiving.

Can we define respect?

I can't speak for all, but from my perspective, the Preds will get respect when there's blood on the ice and the day comes where we know that the road to the Cup goes through Nashville.
I'm not denegrating the Preds, but they're not a rival yet. Those kinds of things take years to develop, or Claude Lemieux.

#2280005 Wings meet Preds in First Round

Posted by vladdy16 on 07 April 2012 - 10:09 PM

Exsqueeze me?! We don't have playoff experience? Have you been living under a rock? We've been in the playoffs 7 of the last 8 years. Yeah, that's not experience

Btw...no one in smashville is takin this series lightly. We know what's at stake. We know it's gonna be a death match. We are sensing some major disrespect from a lot of wings fan.

To be fair, he said not a lot of experience. Compared to 21 consecutive years and the entire length of Lidstrom's career, Preds don't have a lot.
I don't know what you're sensing or where you're sensing it from, but I don't see any disrespect here thus far.
Bear in mind you're in enemy territory for future reference.

#2279859 Money On The Board - Playoff Style

Posted by vladdy16 on 07 April 2012 - 03:33 PM

Our favorite time of year is back! We get playoff hockey, Photoshop threads and we also get to do our Second Annual Money On The Board for playoffs. Last year we raised over $800 for Children's Hospital. :clap: This year I thought we'd donate to Ilitch Charities.
For those who weren't here for last year's festivities, the way this works is you pledge whatever you want however you want. For example, you could pledge X amount for every series or every game. Some have pledged per goal per certain player or X amount for every blocked shot or every goal scored by the blue line as well to add extra incentive.
Money is paid at the end of the series. If you pledge only for a series win and (God forbid) the Wings don't take the series, no money exchanges hands. The money is donated at the end of the Wings' playoff run. Funds are sent to me through a PayPal account I have set up strictly for LGW events. Donations are made in Matt's name. He was very vocal and emphatic about his enthusiasm for this event and made sure Children's Hospital was aware of how the money reached them.
The straightforward pledges that are posted here, I can keep track of. If you pledge per blocked shot by a specific player, it will work on the honor system.
Let's see if we can break last year's total. Thanks so much to all who participate with funds or in spirit and


#2278993 Tortorella Slams Orpik, Crosby, Malkin,...

Posted by vladdy16 on 06 April 2012 - 08:49 PM

it is impossible when you talk about most arrogant organization in NHL.

Well played. :lol:

#2278856 Tortorella Slams Orpik, Crosby, Malkin,...

Posted by vladdy16 on 06 April 2012 - 12:37 PM

I kind of want to know what was said, even though I'm pretty sure I read the post and didn't think anything of it. I drop quite a few bombs around here, well, frankly because I'm an adult and I should be able to. Just kind of curious what's crossing the line and what is not. As a matter of fact, pretty sure I dropped 4 four letter words after last night's game.

Heat of the moment usually is fine. Casual conversation should be kept respectful. It's only polite. Whether you're an adult or not, as most of us are, is immaterial. Matt has asked us all to be judicious in the use of curse words is all. Dropping an F bomb in every other post is going to get edited or deleted, and it's silly to lose posting privileges over it.

I will leave this conversation here as it is helpful, but any further questions or concerns please handle via the PM system so we don't completely derail this thread.

#2278839 Tortorella Slams Orpik, Crosby, Malkin,...

Posted by vladdy16 on 06 April 2012 - 12:16 PM

I'm sorry, but that really is how much I love Torts. Got a man crush. I shall now refrain when unneeded!

I get it. I've been known to use colorful language - I'm not against it. It should just be used sparingly is all. The word "freakin'" works pretty well for me. Feel free to use it. :)

#2278816 Tortorella Slams Orpik, Crosby, Malkin,...

Posted by vladdy16 on 06 April 2012 - 11:43 AM

DO refrain from using vulgar language. There isn't an active curse word filter here because our members have shown in the past that it isn't required to make your point. Curse words can, at times, be an effective way of translating some emotion into a post, but only if done so in moderation. Abuse of this privilege will result in the activation of the curse filter and the suspension of the offending member's account.

#2267635 3/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Flyers 3

Posted by vladdy16 on 06 March 2012 - 08:55 PM

So if a guy has his head down you can't hit him? The only reason his head got hit was because he was staring down at the ice.

I totally agree. Dumbass had his head down, more than likely knowing Kronwall was there.
I don't like it or agree with it, but those are the new rules.

I wish part of the new rules was the ability to decline a PP. 9 shorthanded goals given up this season? Second in the league. Pitiful.

#2267528 3/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Flyers 3

Posted by vladdy16 on 06 March 2012 - 08:37 PM

Headshot. He wasn't aiming for the head, but it was principle point of contact - 2 games.

#2262058 2/23 GDT : Canucks 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

Posted by vladdy16 on 24 February 2012 - 10:58 AM

The idea that the Canucks are divers is anecdotal non-sense perpetuated by eastern media and fans who don't actually follow the Canucks. The reality is no one stays up past 10 or 11 to watch the games.

If Holland and Babcock respect Gillis, Vigneault and the Canucks, which they do, that is enough for me to know what real hockey people think about the team.

Excellent game last night. Maybe the Wings will get the win next time.

I love how your every comment seeks to denigrate those who's opinions don't concur with yours. Classic case of an inferiority complex.
Wings are in the west - Wings fans quite often stay up past 10 or 11 to watch games. Of course it just has to be the media that conjures and reinforces these specious stereotypes out of thin air. Lord knows we don't have good vision or any real hockey sense to be able to make these determinations on our own.
I find it odd that a Nucks fan who doesn't care about the opinion of Wings fans would make it a point to come over to a Wings board after a Vancouver win and state that specifically. Methinks thou doth protest too much.....
Some of these attitudes strike me as eerily similar to those of Preds fans who insist there's some big rivalry between these teams when thus far there clearly isn't, at least in the minds of thousands of "delusional" Detroit fans. Maybe someday we'll have the epiphany you obviously so desperately want us to have.
That being said, in spite of some issues, Vancouver deserved the win IMO.

#2259452 Canucks Vs Detroit in Motor City

Posted by vladdy16 on 20 February 2012 - 07:06 PM

We didn't offer these opinions unsolicited - they were asked for by a Nucks fan who insists this is a touchstone game. Sorry, but as a hockey fan who saw 30 longer ago than I care to admit, no one outside of Canada and under God only knows what age considers Vancouver an NHL "flagship." And no one has "dumped on" Vancouver in this thread any more than (and quite a bit less than) I've seen Nucks fans do in seasons past; we just don't consider this a game any more important than most. And we've lost regular season series to many whom we have subsequently dismissed from the playoffs. Outside of a divisional rival, regular season series in a good season don't mean a whole lot.
Detroit hasn't had an actual riot since 1968 and I defy you to find any real evidence outside of accusations from non-local media to prove otherwise, yet it's a perpetual joke in North America. Anyone who does have an actual riot is going to hear about it repeatedly from Detroiters. Might as well learn to live with it - it's not going away any time soon.
And it's not luck the Wings have been dominant - it's by the grace of Mike Ilitch and the genius of Jim Devellano. We Michiganders must be right with Jesus to be so blessed.
So I'm sorry if we don't hold the Nucks in the same esteem you do, but I am hard pressed to think of any reason thus far why we should.

#2259347 2/19 GDT : Sharks 2 at Red Wings 3

Posted by vladdy16 on 20 February 2012 - 01:34 PM

According to the San Jose Mercury News, Vlasic is okay!

#2259225 Canucks Vs Detroit in Motor City

Posted by vladdy16 on 20 February 2012 - 08:25 AM

I can't speak for anyone else, but for me, Vancouver games mean no more than Phoenix games. It's just another game on the schedule that I'd like to win.

#2259048 Sharks May overcome your streak. Otherwise it would be a great game.

Posted by vladdy16 on 19 February 2012 - 04:06 PM

Sort of surprised this has remained up. It's pretty obvious trolling, even if the horrendous grammar gave me a good chuckle.

Very doubtful I would see a topic such as this posted to the Sharks' forum if the tables were turned.

I was originally going to pull it, but I thought the general populace might like to feed on him a little. Too evil?