With Holland saying the ball is in Jagr's court and he wants to know before July 1st and the report by Jagr's agent saying they are going to wait till July 1st to sign a contract, Does that mean Jagr's chances for Detroit are now gone like his mullet?
This isn't the horribly dirty hit you're playing it out to be. It was an illegal hit, sure, but what's getting it attention is that Horton was hurt. If he weren't hurt, it would have been a two-minute penalty for interference and this thread wouldn't exist. Bear in mind too that many players are injured on clean hits.
How is "accordingly" 5+ games for a hit like this? One is not punished based on the severity of the injury.
Everyone in the hockey analysis world disagrees with you.
I agree with you on this. Yes it was a tad late..barely. was not a shot to the head. I think some people need to "re-watch" the video a little more close and not have the hate on for the nucks when watching. I think if any 1-2 games...thats it. But thats just me.
I know it's only a couple of incidents, but they make me question his decision making.
if these 2 videos make you dislike the guy then please don't watch any of chelios's old videos =)
Me personally i love the avery taunt and that hit on seabrook may it be a little high was not like it was blind sided or anything. i think we need someone with a little more sandpaper like that. thats why i miss downey so much.
The Avery taunt per what some were saying was just Wisniewski telling Avery to brush his teeth. geez=)
No one is putting an All-time label on him now, but he's one of the few players in this generation that have the ability to do so. He's on the pace to be one.
The NHL will suffer so very much if Crosby does not recover 100%. Crosby will be the reason the NHL will be successful league or fall back into the shadows
Well i do agree with you that he is one hell of a player and can be That great star of the nhl..i have to disagree about the success of the nhl being on his shoulders. How about the nhl push the greatness of datsyuk? or many others that are great in this league and not just focus on 1 player 90-95% of the time.
I honestly think you all have blinders on when you watch Hudler. I'm not going to sit here and praise him as though he's the greatest player on the planet but sometimes I think I'm not watching the same game as the rest of you. I can see his faults and when he has s***ty games (which he certainly did this year) but the absolute refusal of the vast majority of posters on this site to give absolutely any credit where credit is due to Hudler is just flat out absurd. I just don't understand how most posters on this site can honestly feel as though they're watching things objectively.
so 5 out of 1000's is the majority? what we can't have our opinions toward him? we have to agree with you?
It was a heck of a series. Stinks one team had to lose. 6 of the 7 games were one goal games. Red Wing fans love this diving thing. Get over it. Your Wings scored an offside goal and a goal with too many men on the ice this series. Setoguchi gets dropped by Bertuzzi in OT and gets called.
Just find this "f*** the Sharks" attitude a bit over the top.
How about you go get your shark shaped dildo and go spin on it. Don't come here after a loss like this and tell us how we should be feeling and all that. Big man now calling everyone babies now that your diving team makes it past us. To be honest it was a really good series i feel but dude really. You probably need to not post in a thread like this after a loss like this.
Hell no. There's too many adolescent, pre-pubescent little snots here who love to do nothing more than spam peoples' posts, regardless of the content therein, and it's basically harassment. It happened when the function existed originally, and you damn well know it will happen again if it's brought back. It doesn't foster discussion, community, or even respect. It's pointless and useless. Not to mention, cowardly. If someone posts "You know, I think Jimmy Howard really isn't that great of a goalie" and gets 20 -1's......how is that a constructive discussion? Why didn't those 20 people quote the post and say "You know, I disagree......."?
If you don't like someone's post, you just ignore it. If you like someone's post, you give them a +1.
I totally agree. There were a lot of people just doing it because of the poster who posted. Had nothing to do with the post it self.
Try posting in the Political Discussion and see how many - you get. you get a - or +....what does it really change anything how you feel about the poster or what they posted? I think it's useless and doesn't need to be there.
Group:Member Posts:1 Joined:Yesterday, 10:50 PM Posted Today, 01:03 AM a classic Jersey -2
A negative 2 in the Chinese jersey thread for saying "a classic jersey"??? come on