Jump to content


toby91_ca's Photo

toby91_ca

Member Since 28 Jun 2002
Offline Last Active Today, 01:59 PM
**---

#2257179 Blackhawks' Losing Streak: Nine Games and Counting

Posted by toby91_ca on 15 February 2012 - 01:26 PM

I think they are just trying to get a record of their own since the Wings just got one. Another 9 losses in a row and they'll have the record.


#2257165 22 is the actual record

Posted by toby91_ca on 15 February 2012 - 12:53 PM

Doesn't Detroit hold the record for most consecutive road wins, also?

Yes...look back a few posts :P


#2257093 22 is the actual record

Posted by toby91_ca on 15 February 2012 - 10:05 AM

Yeah, i'm not sure why they were all types of up in arms about it. It's that and the fact that 4 of them have been OT/SO winners. The Wings can never just get a pat on the back, haters gonna hate. I was hoping someone had alittle more of a background story about it though.

The OT/SO (especially SO) is a legitimate point though....it's impact is quite huge. That doesn't keep anyone from patting them on the back though...it's jut pointing out a fact.


#2256438 Rinaldo gets two games for the charge on Big E

Posted by toby91_ca on 14 February 2012 - 10:05 AM

OK. Rewatched. The difference might be that Kronwall turned to his back and didn't target the head.

Rinaldo didn't target the head either though. I agreed with everything Shanny said, it was clearly a charge, which is why it should have been a penalty. I don't see why there is a suspension though. I guess what Rinaldo did last week weighed heavily into this as I don't see how what he did is worse than what Kronwall has done...see earlier video in this thread.

Leaving your feet to make a hit does not = suspension automatically. In a lot of cases, such a hit may target the head and will be suspensions, but when they don't, I think it's just a charging penalty.

He didn't target the head and the NHL agrees he didn't, otherwise, he would have gotten more than 2 games. If they wanted to suspend him, they should have done so last week.

dont know if that deserved a suspension... Ericsson shouldn't have been looking behind him. These concussion rules are so dumb (not that this was a hit to the head).

You are correct, Big E shouldn't have been doing what he did, but that doesn't mean he should get hit the way he did. I agree with no suspension though.


#2256278 Is Nicklas Lidstrom The Greatest Detroit Red Wing Of All Time?

Posted by toby91_ca on 13 February 2012 - 03:23 PM

I thought i made it clear on my post, that Yzerman was my pick. I was merely throwing in great names that helped make the Yzerman era that much greater. That guys like Draper and McCarty were built around Yzerman.

Sorry I lost you.

I think you are losing me to. If you are having a discussion about all time greats, I don't think McCarty or Draper should even me allowed to know about the discussion, let alone be involved in it :P


#2256234 Is Nicklas Lidstrom The Greatest Detroit Red Wing Of All Time?

Posted by toby91_ca on 13 February 2012 - 01:30 PM

I have Howe 2nd all-time, behind only Wayne Gretzky. He has led the league in points by Lemieux-like margins, but was mean and good defensively as well. He finished top 5 in points for 20 straight years - next closest is Gretzky at 16. He also led the league in postseason points 5 times.

Off topic now, but interesting that you make reference to Lemieux in terms of how wide of a margin Howe led in points rather than Gretzky. I did a quick comparsion and learned a few things (actually, learned one thing and was reminded of a few others). I didn't realize just how much of a wide marging Howe was winning scoring titles. I guess I just assumed it was small since he didn't put up huge point totals. So here is my comparison in terms of how much each led the rest of the league in the years they won the scoring title.

I've put % in brackets beause scoring was lower in Howe's ara so his margin would look a lot smaller otherwise.

Howe:

'51 - 20pts (30%)
'52 - 17pts (25%)
'53 - 24pts (34%)
'54 - 14pts (21%)
'57 - 4pts (5%)
'63 - 5pts (6%)

Lemieux:

'88 - 31pts (18%)
'89 - 19pts (13%)
'92 - 8pts (7%)
'93 - 12pts (8%)
'96 - 12pts (8%)
'97 - 13pts (12%)

Gretzky:

'81 - 29pts (21%)
'82 - 65pts (44%)
'83 - 72pts (58%)
'84 - 86pts (68%)
'85 - 73pts (54%)
'86 - 74pts (52%)
'87 - 75pts (69%)

'90 - 13pts (10%)
'91 - 32pts (24%)
'94 - 10pts (8%)

A lot of people discount Gretzky's stats because he played in an era where every scored a ton. This is true, but the extent to which he dominated is quite amazing. The bolded stats are just plain stupid.

Another interesting note, if Lemieux didn't miss the entire 94/95 season, he or Gretzky would likely have won teh scoring title for 17 years in a row.

Edit - formatting


#2254420 Anyone Ever Notice This?

Posted by toby91_ca on 09 February 2012 - 05:33 PM

I'm guessing it's partly that, but I think it's also that Lidstrom constantly has his head up, so he's really hard to get a good hit on.

It's seriously ridiculous how little he looks down at the puck. Next game just watch Lids. He's almost never looking down, whether he's skating up ice with the puck, making a pass, or taking a shot. I'm not sure he even knows what his skates look like.

No, that may be true in other examples, but I am specifically referring to situations where he could have easily been hammered, the player is there, they still hit him, but it was more like the type of bump you'd see at an all star game.


#2250922 Future retired numbers

Posted by toby91_ca on 31 January 2012 - 02:11 PM

Datsyuk is already a lock for the Hall of Fame, IMO.

Really? How many HOFers have scored 200 goals and 700 points?

He'll probably get there, but I'm not sure I'd call him a lock at this point.
  • Ram likes this


#2250498 SI: Sidney Crosby to visit spine specialist in Calif.

Posted by toby91_ca on 28 January 2012 - 09:44 PM

Interesting series of tweets from Bob McCown:

FadooBobcat Bob McCown
Sydney Crosby has injury to C1 and C2 vertebrae

FadooBobcat Bob McCown
Injury diagnosed during recent trip to Utah, but apparently missed by Pittsburgh doctors who were treating him.

FadooBobcat Bob McCown
Drs expect Crosby to heal and be ready for playoffs. Unclear if he even suffered 2nd concussion. Sid said to be very unhappy with Pit docs.

I see this as great news for the league, but awful news for the Pens doctors.

Edit: I'm assuming the vertebrae injury happened with the original concussion and had it been found/addressed, he wouldn't have had any issues after he came back in December.

The Pens medical staff has to be completely embarrased right about now, but they seem to have screwed up several times. Let's not forget that they let him play, not only the 3rd period in the Winter classic, but the next game as well...after likely having broken his neck and suffering a oncussion. I understand the neck thing just came out now, but even without that, they should have learned from Crosby's concussion, yet this year, they let Letang go back in a game after taking a pretty wicked head shot. Sure enough, within the next few days, he's out with a concussion.

Someone really should be fired.


#2250497 The SuperSkills competition is an embarrassment

Posted by toby91_ca on 28 January 2012 - 09:38 PM

Is anyone else bothered by the way Kane sounds when he's talked to by the commentators? He sounds to me like he doesn't want to be bothered, or kind of arrogant. I hear he's a bit of a jerk from even Chicago fans but I was just wondering if anyone else got that feeling...

With that said, Kanes superman goal was pretty neat. I thought Perry's was a bit better.

I'm not bothered, he's just a complete idiot/ass/whatever you want to call him. If he was related to me, I'd be bothered.


#2249954 Winter Classic Idea

Posted by toby91_ca on 26 January 2012 - 09:55 AM

I think it's asking for a complete disaster. What happens if the game needs to be pushed back a few hours because of weather like it has in past years. All of a sudden you are competing directly with the Super Bowl. The aricle elludes to the need to push back the timing in the past and one of the suggestions was just to play new year's night.....why did they simply forget all about that when they got to the "obvious" choice?


#2249366 Cooke Boards or Jackman Dives?

Posted by toby91_ca on 25 January 2012 - 04:47 PM

Someone who is hit from behind into the boards does not have their feet flopping up behind them like that....no question he dove and not hidden very well. I'm guessing the ref didn't actually see the full play and used judgment to come up with the 2 min boarding call.


#2248958 Hemsky : Knee on knee hit

Posted by toby91_ca on 24 January 2012 - 11:53 AM

The whole repeat offender thing is proving to weigh heavy on decisions.

I don't think so. It didn't look all that bad to me. The classic knee on knee playing is when a playing is coming down with speed and makes a move where the defender sticks his leg out in reaction to that. I didn't see that at all here, Hemsky looks to be going for the puck with his head down, didn't move his leg out from what I can tell....looks like Burns is the only one that moved a leg. Hemsky would have had to jump out of the way to avoid contact.


#2248312 Ovechkin hits Michalek

Posted by toby91_ca on 23 January 2012 - 02:14 PM

Yeah, pretty much. I've watched it a bunch of time in slow-mo...and at the very least...it was a front/shoulder hit and wasn't from behind. NHL hit.

Whether it was from behind or not is irrelevant. He hit him in the head with his shoulder, while leaving his feet to make the hit....I'm not sure how you can consider that a clean hit.

Even 5 years ago, that wouldn't have been a clean hit due to him leaving his feet.


#2244296 Cherry rips Holland

Posted by toby91_ca on 11 January 2012 - 11:15 AM

My only thought on this is - what did Holland/Nill/amateur scouts see in Emmerton 41st, Matthias 47th, and Axelsson 62nd over Lucic 50th, and Marchand 71st in the 2006 draft?

As already noted, more potential as that is all you have to go on in the draft. It is a crapshoot for the most part and you can go on and on all day, week, month coming up with examples of why was so and so chosen over so and so. I'll give you another, why did the Wings pick Jody Gage and Boris Fistric instead of Mark Messier?

Looking at the players you pointed out though, using a purely stats based analysis (much more goes into the draft obviously), you'll get the following (from year they were drafted). I left out Axelsson as he was playing in Europe, harder to compare from pure stats perspective vs. the other guys that all played in the CHL.

Emmerton - 6'0", 190 lbs, 66 games, 90 pts
Matthias - 6'4", 216lbs, 67 games, 34 pts

Lucic - 6'4", 220lbs, 62 games, 19 pts
Marchand - 5'9", 190lbs, 68 games, 66 pts

Looking at that and knowing the draft is a crapshoot, it should make a lot of sense as to why Emmerton and Matthias were drafted ahead of Lucic and Marchand. Emmerton clearly looked to have the most offensive upside and he had good size. Matthias and Lucic were both had great size, but Matthias appeared to have better offensive upside (they were both drafted very close together. While Marchand appeared to be better offsensively than those to, he was very small. Guys like him often don't even get drafted. If you are that size, you have to be great offensively to get a sniff and it's not like he was lights out in that regard, he was just about 1 ppg.