Jump to content

toby91_ca's Photo


Member Since 28 Jun 2002
Offline Last Active Today, 09:24 AM

#2125311 Trevor Gillies

Posted by toby91_ca on 03 March 2011 - 02:17 PM

Clutterbucks hit was worse than Gillies. Only difference is Clutterbuck is one of those players that dishes out the cheap hits but when it happens to him he drops like a lemon.

Gillies did what any player sticking up for a rookie who was hit from behind in his 2nd ever NHL game would do.

Wow! I'm not even sure what to say, but I'll try. I'd call a boarding penalty on Clutterbuck, but the hit wasn't that bad at all. The Isles player was skating up the ice when Clutterbuck committed to the hit and then the Isles player lost control of the puck, looked down and turned towards the boards. Clutterbuck even looks to let up on the hit. You have to blame Clutterbuck here, but those are tough hits to avoid at times and happen on the time.

I highly doubt any player sticking up for a rookie woudl decide the best course of action would be to jump into the guy, with elbows up and drive the guy's head into the glass.

Gillies will get extra time because he's a repeat offender and because he was literally 2 minutes into coming back from a 9 game suspension for the same thing, but if a guy like Lidstrom did the same thing, he'd get suspended too. However, that's a mute point because we all know that Lidstrom would never do that.

#2125228 Trevor Gillies

Posted by toby91_ca on 03 March 2011 - 11:14 AM

Disclaimer: Playing devil's advocate here.

Gilles cares whether Clutterbuck's hit was clean/questionable or not...
That's why he's there... to "protect" young players (DiBenedetto - 22y/o - second game)

...and the incidents are mere moments apart.
They are tied together. Clutterbuck delivers a hit Gilles sees as questionable. He delivers his retaliation/protection.
He's just doing it wrong.

I understand the reason, but I would certainly hope it has no bearing at all in length of suspension.

I'd prefer the response to be a nice clean body check that hurts, but I'd also accept him taking an instigator penatly and lay a beat down on the guy. To do what he did though, is just stupid and exactly what the league is trying to get rid of.

#2100138 Crosby on strike

Posted by toby91_ca on 19 January 2011 - 03:29 PM

Wow, it's like Crosby is having a meltdown and the league is trying to make sure he doesn't kill himself. It's really not that big of a deal. If he's seriously upset about not being picked he clearly has some massive ego issues.


Sweet Jesus, seriously? Crosby gets hit in the head and suddenly they need to ban even incidental hits to the head? I guess whenever someone is coming at you and you have the puck, just crouch so they veer off to avoid hitting your head. I love how things go all nuclear as soon as Crosby gets hurt. Words cannot describe how much I detest that boy and his overall prissy attitude and passive aggressiveness. It's like he knows he has Bettman wrapped around his pinky. Did Gretzky ever pull stuff like this when he played? I only got to see him every now and again, and I knew he had a reputation as a bit of a whiner, but was it this bad?

Are we reading the same stuff????

Where do you get the impression, in any way, shape or form, that Crosby is upset about not being selected? Looks like your massive hate on is blinding you from the facts.

In terms of all the attention his injury is getting, it should....head shots are bad and they'd like to remove them, but it's a tricky subject. The league went nuclear and actually came up with a rule change on the spot after the Cooke hit on Savard.....league hasn't done anything about the Crosby hit, so not sure what you are all worked up about.

I can just imagine the whining we'd be subjected to here if it was Crosby that got hit last year and not Savard and the rule change came because of that....it would be whining of epic proportions. But of course it wasn't him, so no big deal right?

#2094863 Norris turning into "best offensive defenseman"?

Posted by toby91_ca on 10 January 2011 - 10:38 AM

- Pet peave of mine (mentioning since I saw it in this thread about 10 times) - players do not get nominated for the awards, the voters (which are not necessarily the same group of people for each award) simply vote for who they think should win (they normally vote their 1st through 5th place). The thought that a top scoring defenseman would get "nominated" simply because of pts, but probably not win is not true. The 3 guys you see up for the awards are simply those that finished top 3 in voting. No one gives the voters a pool of players to vote from, they vote for whoever they want.

- the league really has no influence over who wins the awards, so saying that the NHL only cares about this or that doesn't make sense and a list compiled by the NHL really doesn't matter when it comes to who will actually win.

- a comment was made about how the top 3 vote getters for the all star game where penguins. Again, the NHL has nothing to do with this. I agree, having Fleury there is stupid, but what are you going do, who cares. Obviously Crosby makes sense and Letang being the top vote getter for defensemen is not unreasonable, he is in the top 4 in scoring (those 4 having pretty similar pt. totals) and he blows everyone else out of the water with +/-. Do I think he's better than Lidstrom? No, but based on those stats, pretty understandable why he'd have a lot of votes.

#2091924 Florida screwed by officials

Posted by toby91_ca on 06 January 2011 - 12:34 PM

The Brad May one was the whole intent to blow crap, that's not an issue here. So what I don't understand is why Toronto didn't call down and inform them that the puck was in thet net. The ref doesn't need to request a review for this to happen.

I think what the ref was thinking was that even if it made it's way into the net, it shouldn't count because the Panther player was jabbing at the goalie's pads while he had it covered. Of course, the puck was already in the net at that point (went in off the initial shot). So, I can kinda see why the ref didn't go to review, but I still don't understand why the war room didn't call down to say it was a goal, I'm confused.

Yeah, the video here is bad, but I have to imagine Toronto has an angle that shows it more clearly.

#2089133 Is Basketball a Canadian sport?

Posted by toby91_ca on 02 January 2011 - 11:26 AM

I'm still trying to figure out why it being American vs. Canadian has any impact on whether it is a better sport or not......confused.

#2074766 Another obviously blown call?

Posted by toby91_ca on 09 December 2010 - 10:46 AM

Dude, ice is slippery.

Also, trying to hold onto your stick with hockey gloves on is almost impossible. If any of you had ever played hockey, you'd know that FFS.

1) Doesn't really matter if it was intentional or not, it's like highsticking, you still have to make the call.

2) I have been playing hockey for 28 years now and I can honestly say that my stick has almost never left my hand, other than when someone slashes it out of my hand (which hasn't happend much either), I can't even remember a single instance where I lost my stick. I'm sure it's happened several times, but obviously not that often. So, holding on to your stick with hockey glove is actually pretty easy. If you find it almost impossible, maybe you should consider changing your gloves, or maybe the way you tape your stick needs to change.

#2074157 Datsyuk in the Hart conversation

Posted by toby91_ca on 08 December 2010 - 04:37 PM

With Crosby, it's not only the point totals, his defensive game is actually pretty good. He's improved year after year, which is largely not noticeable, but this year, a lot of people are actually noticing his defensive game.

He's not going to win the selke this year and is not on the same level as Dats yet in terms of defensive game, but I woudln't be surprised if he gets there at some point in the next few years, he just seems to have an uncanny ability to go away during the summer and work on a part of the game people think is lacking and comes back for the next season vastly improved in that area.

#2057948 Get ready folks, hitting is about to exit our game

Posted by toby91_ca on 05 November 2010 - 11:54 AM

However, both Murph and Holik agreed that the 5 minute penalty should have been assessed but not a game misconduct.

If that is the case, I think both Murph and Holik need to educate themselves on the rule:

Rule 48 Illegal Check to the Head
48.1 Illegal Check to the Head A lateral or blind side hit to an opponent
where the head is targeted and/or the principle point of contact is not
48.2 Minor Penalty There is no provision for a minor penalty for this rule.
48.3 Major Penalty For a violation of this rule, a major penalty shall be
assessed (see 48.4).
48.4 Game Misconduct Penalty An automatic game misconduct penalty
shall be assessed whenever a major penalty is assessed under this

#2057857 An Unlikely Scrap

Posted by toby91_ca on 05 November 2010 - 08:06 AM

Has it gotten to the point that people on this form dislike the guy so much logic thought can not be processed when it comes to him?

For the record, Niskanen is BIGGER than Crosby. Crosby picks his spots and doesn't fight guys with more fighting experience? Come on, Crosby isn't a fighter, why would he pick fights with fighters. People are acting as it Crosby singles out the weakest player in every game and goes out and picks a fight with them. He's been in 4 or 5 fights in his career and has fought guys in and around his size.....is there really anything wrong with that? There is because it's Crosby of course, I must be an idiot, that's the one variable I did not consider.

#2057851 Get ready folks, hitting is about to exit our game

Posted by toby91_ca on 05 November 2010 - 07:54 AM

I don't think it's an elbow, but I also don't think that matters. I was clearly a headshot and it was clearly an east to west hit. Not sure how people are seeing it as North/South.

I think the rule is going to cause wrong calls being made by officials, but let's be honest, we've have super slow mo video here and we're still arguing about it. All the officials have is real time, full speed and not necessarily the best angle.

But when it comes down to it, maybe it just causes bad calls, some growing pains, but I doubt it will take hitting out of the game....unless you start seeing guys get suspended when they really shouldn't.

In this case, I think he should be suspended. This isn't a matter of being tough, we're talking about guys heads here. And it's not a matter of potentially ending someone's career, it's much worse than that, the players quality of life is on the line.

If the player has his head down (yes, Perron did), that's his own fault, but in this case, Thornton also came from the side, which is the no no now, which I agree with.

#2052786 Easiest Division

Posted by toby91_ca on 26 October 2010 - 08:36 AM

I think a couple guys might not have noticed that they are replying to posts that were made 5 years ago.

#2049710 Rypien suspended 6 games

Posted by toby91_ca on 20 October 2010 - 04:38 PM

He grabbed the kid. He didn't assault him. I'm thinking a 5 game suspension.

Since he has an in-person hearing schedule, his suspension will = MIN 5 games.

With respect to pending lawsuit against him....bulls***.

#2047700 Letang "blindside" hit on Comeau

Posted by toby91_ca on 15 October 2010 - 10:46 PM

It looks clean to me, but I have to admit that I'm starting to get sick of seeing another player laid out every night in the highlights. Don't know if Comeau is alright or what happened to him after the hit, but 2 weeks into the season and there are already over a dozen concussions in the league.

I think Ryan Miller was right when he said we need to change the culture.

Comeau is perfectly fine, I suspect he laid on the ice for a bit to try and sell it.

#2047693 Letang "blindside" hit on Comeau

Posted by toby91_ca on 15 October 2010 - 10:29 PM

It wasn't blindside, but it was an elbow to the head..

I'm sorry, but are you completely insane??? Elbow to the head? The closest the elbow came to the head was when Letang's elbow was next to Comeau's elbow when he hit him shoulder to shoulder, other than that, I don't see the elbow as coming even within 3 feet of the head.

This is the bad part of the new rule....you are going to see guys get 5 and a game like this for perfectly clean hits that would never have been called penalties in the past.
  • Nev likes this