Owners 100% at fault, players 0%. You have made your position understood.
For giving out contracts they can afford? You bet they are. Or when a player is offered a contract he should say "No, this is a bit too much. This would be a burden on your team's finances dear GM"? What exactly is the player's fault when he is accepting a contract, which a team really should not have offered?
I am not talking about CBA, lockout or anything else. This is about teams paying money they do not have.
- Johnz96 likes this