Eager? I have been youtubing Probie and Kocer fights. I think that is a punk move to the way the fella's used to square up. In my opinion Eager pulls a bertuzzi without the injury.
- wings1110 likes this
Male
Posted by IceMunkee
on 01 February 2011 - 10:48 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 21 January 2011 - 11:24 PM
This thread is about Nabokov - please keep it to that particular subject. No beers, no goalie wars, and if you "report" someone has made a claim, please cite a source.
I'd hate to have to pull this thread, but I will if I have to delete another 3 pages of irrelevant posts.
Posted by IceMunkee
on 21 January 2011 - 08:10 PM
No doubt Jimmy gets complacent but that is not the reason the Brass is making this move. They are not signing him to shine Jimmy's shoes, dance for him or do backflips, well maybe the last just in net. The move is not for Jimmy and his entertainment. This is a team move. Nabs is a great... okay really good goaltender. That has been the winningest goalie in the regular season, sometimes starting 70ish games a season and a "shakey" playoff past. This move is not for Jimmy. It is because of Jimmy. All goes well we can have a once overworked goalie and Jimmy splitting time and the possibilities of a once great goalie could be the answer.Wasn't one of the major knocks on Howard when he was in GR was that he would become complacent? Maybe management feels he's showing signs of that.
Posted by IceMunkee
on 21 January 2011 - 06:43 PM
It makes little differance that he came through our system. There is no way he was rushed and Babcock is the last to blame. We spent a ton of time pampering Jimmy and it is time. He has to be better and this will push him. Push him by motivation or push him right out on his butt. I just think it would be silly to stay with Jimmy and an injuried Ozzy becauuse they came through our system or they are swell guys!Asked about the Nabokov signing, Howard said: "That's out of my hands. That's up to management and what they think. If he can help us, he can help us." Asked whether he thought Nabokov, 35, was signed as insurance or to push him, Howard said: "I don't need anyone to push me. I push myself. I work hard in practice every single day, and I just go out there and try to win games for the guys." Read more: Wings know Nabokov a long way from joining team | freep.com | Detroit Free Press http://www.freep.com/article/20110121/SPORTS05/101210437/Wings-know-Nabokov-a-long-way-from-joining-team#ixzz1BiEnTq2D
This is why I called this a bulls*** move earlier. I don't think it's fair to Howard and I don't like the way he's been set up. I'm not angry at Howard for his play this year, though it's frustrating. And while I don't hate Babcock, you could say it angers me to consider the manner in which he's dealt with Howard. I've said all along that he's being set up to be run down and I didn't like it. I think he's got a load of potential and I feel like they've squandered it, and any way you shake it, to me this move feels like they've given up on Howard.
And I don't like it one damn bit.
Howard's the first guy to come through the organization that I think has the attitude and skill to be the long-term goalie since the last long-term goalie, Chris Osgood. I think it's total bulls*** that Babcock tried to fast track his development at the risk of him crashing, when he really should know better. Countless other young goalies who burn out fast tell the tale. As the pressure mounts and they're not mentally acclimated enough to the NHL game to deal with it, things fall apart. I don't think it was fair to Howard at all and I don't like it one bit.
Whether he moves to another team or never returns to a consistent form, I think it will be an absolute shame.
And the only animosity I will have towards anyone involved in the matter will be Mike Babco
Posted by IceMunkee
on 16 October 2010 - 09:19 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 09 September 2010 - 08:24 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 12 August 2010 - 03:54 AM
I don't have favorite players on those teams. Why respond if your response is only to trash the thread? It is all in the name of boredom and fun.why ask this question if you only answer 80% of it?
Posted by IceMunkee
on 12 August 2010 - 01:19 AM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 07 August 2010 - 03:03 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 13 July 2010 - 03:13 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 07 July 2010 - 01:48 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 05 July 2010 - 09:31 PM
Posted by IceMunkee
on 24 June 2010 - 12:13 PM
Find content