Third Man In

HoF Booster
  • Content Count

    4,385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Third Man In

  1. Third Man In

    [GDT] 10/2 - Blues 4, Red Wings 3 (Stockholm)

    How do you say 'Drop the friggin' puck' in Swedish?
  2. Third Man In

    [GDT] 10/2 - Blues 4, Red Wings 3 (Stockholm)

    looks like there's been a lot of emphasis on crashing the net in camp.
  3. Third Man In

    [GDT] 10/2 - Blues 4, Red Wings 3 (Stockholm)

    4th line looks pretty good, eh?
  4. Third Man In

    [GDT] 10/2 - Blues 4, Red Wings 3 (Stockholm)

    About friggin' time. Go Wings!
  5. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    Yes. Just win TODAY.
  6. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    Brandon Inge. All-Star. Suck on that for awhile, Inge haters. Sidenote: who woulda thought Brandon would be an All-Star in Detroit before Cabrera?
  7. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    For different reasons it pains me to say any of these guys should go, but you're both right. The Cabrera trade didn't make Inge redundant--it made Guillen and Maggs redundant, and one of them (Carlos) should have been moved last year (ouch!). Maggs I think still has it in him to be a good DH/RF. I love Willis and Robertson too, but they just don't have it anymore. Bondo's another story--I think he gets more time to sort things out, even if he's looking like our Mark Prior at the moment. As for all these other kids (Anderson, Clete, Raburn, Kelley...), they've all shown signs that they can be everyday players, and they've also at times looked like they may be valuable utility players but not starters. The platoon in LF I think is hampering their development--Tigers need to decide that they're going to commit to giving one of them a real chance the rest of the year despite the growing pains, not this two week callup at a time business.
  8. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    Raburn! Inge! That was definitely one of the more exciting wins this season. Glad to see the team bail Zumaya out.
  9. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    Wow, did the Tigers just do the Cards a favor--drop a series to them and then sweep the Brewers.
  10. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    Galarraga was un-unhittable tonight. He'd have someone down 0-2 and looking awkward and they'd still get a hit. With his season last year he was supposed to be the guy who made us forget that Jair Jurrjens for Edgar Rentaria debacle. The Tigers need to give him a chance to get it back. But he's miles from the pitcher he was last year (that pitcher is now inhabiting Edwin Jackson's body). I don't know if last year was a fluke, or if him pitching in the WBC was detrimental, or what.
  11. Third Man In

    2009 Detroit Tigers Season Thread

    I guess it's baseball season in earnest now. Porcello with the win and two RBIs yesterday. Today? not so good. Let's see which D-Train we get tomorrow.
  12. Third Man In

    SCF GAME 7 GDT: Penguins 2 at Red Wings 1

    Let's Go Red Wings! :clap: :clap: :octo: *splat* :octo: *splat*
  13. Third Man In

    PRONGER TRADED TO LA

    They are certainly well-positioned to make one. I kept thinking to myself, "The Kings are close to the Cup. They just need to find that missing piece."
  14. Third Man In

    SCF GAME 7 GDT: Penguins 2 at Red Wings 1

    And Arby's. Finally. LFR.
  15. Third Man In

    SCF GAME 7 GDT: Penguins 2 at Red Wings 1

    This is for everything. The Wings will play like it.
  16. Third Man In

    The first goal will be a huge factor tomorrow

    Babcock on first goals:
  17. Third Man In

    1955 posts for game 7 STANLEY CUP WIN!

    Hopefully the Wings can make the most of the opportunity in front of them.
  18. Third Man In

    1955 posts for game 7 STANLEY CUP WIN!

    Z's got Sid covered one more time.
  19. Third Man In

    Crosby Slowing Down?

    LA papers are saying Kobe is running out of time. He's all of 30. Yeah, I think it's gotta take its toll. Starting young doesn't mean you get 24 years in the NHL as opposed to 18.