All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
-
Yes. No. No. Trade 2024 2nd or 2023 3rd for Tom Wilson
-
In my current Franchise mode in NHL23, which I'm in season 2038-39, I drafted Willander way back in the first draft. 29th overall. Unfortunately he never made the NHL in my franchise. He played 11 seasons in GR until he was released and went to Calgary for 2 seasons, now he's in Ottawa to start this season. Maybe in the real world he'll have a better NHL career!
- Yesterday
-
https://www.facebook.com/BradGalliTV/videos/548477400354009/ Watching this you can SEE how gutless our current team is. Larionov was willing to go in 1997. He was 5'10", 170 lbs. But Mo Seider at 6'3", 210 lbs. wont drop em. He's such a t w a t.
-
this seems about right
-
-
I dont think all 3 will make the Wings but def wouldnt be opposed to it. My guess would be Edvinsson/Kasper in D Wallinder/Mazur in GR.
-
Offseaaon moves: Zadina and 2024 1st to AZ for Crouse Sign Foligno Sign Reaves
-
-
If we dont move these guys onto the Red Wings next year, then we are stupid.
-
Undersized left shot w with unspectacular numbers as a 22yo. Likely wouldnt of factored into Detroits plans anyway. No loss. Hoping to see Mazur/Kasper/Wallinder sign/play a few games with GRG tho.
-
Ran tankathon a bunch of times this morning, the Blues who are 10th and the Canucks are 8th (oddly, despite more regulation wins) won the lottery in multiple simulations. The Wings didn't move up once. I think tankathon has build in the leagues anti Detroit bias into their algorithm.
-
https://www.prohockeyrumors.com/2023/03/robert-mastrosimone-unlikely-to-sign-with-detroit.html
-
-
Works for me, I'm game that's for sure.
-
- Last week
-
The Hockey Writers, who are often out to lunch, suggested Lawson Crouse as a trade target... a big power forward that can score... sign me up!
-
We need somebody that can PUNCH FACES.
-
-
-
Welcoming and teaching is not acceptance. The point of shepherding was to turn the listener away from their wrongs, not to accept and embrace them. I made this point before. You can welcome someone into your workspace without agreeing with their ideology. People with different belief systems work together cohesively all of the time. I bet you work with people you don't agree with. Does that make you an unwelcoming person? A locker room or ice surface is no different. A parents love is unconditional. That doesn't mean they accept or agree with everything their child does. By your logic, a parent can't love their child, or a child cant feel loved, without parents supporting everything their child does. And that just simply is not true. No one said that "Hockey is for Everyone" is an LGBT campaign, but Pride Night is. Believe it or not, you can do the former without the latter, and you can support the former without wearing a Pride jersey. You can support the inclusion of someone professionally without supporting their personal lifestyle. You can hate guns, and still support another persons right to own them. You can hate alcohol, but oppose Prohibition. Its not that difficult of a concept. I know you want to think that the jersey is only about inclusion, but it obviously means something more to some of the players being asked to wear it. And they shouldn't be forced to because of how someone else defines it. That would go against the premise of inclusion and being welcoming to everyone, wouldn't it? If a player refused to wear a Christmas jersey because they don't celebrate Christmas, is that wrong? Or a St Valentines or St Patricks jersey because those are Catholic Saints, is that wrong? Would that make them hateful or "unwelcoming" to Catholics, or offensive to Christians? Would their declination be respected? Pretty sure it would. And removing shoes before entering a Japanese home does not go against Scripture. So its a moot argument. I have an idea . How about we all just stop being perpetually offended and emotionally fragile and accept our differences?
-
I think you are confusing the message of the hockey is for everyone campaign. Just as Jesus lived a life of compassion and kindness for all of gods children, welcoming and teaching the "sheep without a shepard" so has Gary Bettman welcomed players of all lifestyles into our NHL family. Bettman is a better christian than Eric Staal is. So Eric Staal loves butt f***ers but hates butt *******? Last I checked hockey is for everyone is for welcoming the person, not the act of homosexual intercourse. I made this point earlier and you disagreed with me... Hockey is for everyone isnt a g-ay campaign. Its an inclusion campaign, to show that all walks of life are welcome in the NHL. Like taking your shoes off in a japanese persons home. It doesnt mean you suddenly follow bushido.
-
Why would we have x2 eddoggs and seiders
-
Seider-Seider Edvinsson-Edvinsson
-
He better get used to staving off elimination if he wants to play for this team.
-
No it doesnt. I think you are confusing love with tolerance and acceptance. The former can exist without the latter. what you are and what you do are 2 entirely different things. I can love who you are but hate what you do. Which just goes to show that the entire exercise is pointless. Just because a player wears the jersey doesn't mean they even support what it stands for.
-
Eric and Marc Staal refuse to wear the rainbow jersey in Florida... even though Eric already wore one once b4 in Montreal. In a press statement they say it is because of their christian beliefs and they do not care how others choose to live thier lives. What did they mean by this?
-
-
Cause the libs flip out and call you a bigot if you dont actively support "current thing" So instead of wheeling the entire Hawks team out in rainbow jerseys, except Seth Jones, and creating a Seth Jones media witch hunt, they choose just to not participate at all. Kind of ironic honestly. If the libs would just stop frothing at the mouth everytime a player chose not to participate, teams wouldnt be canceling pride nights. But bc they cant respect a worldview not their own, now their own precious pride nights are getting canceled lol. And just to be clear, I support pride nights. Hockey is for everyone is an admirable campaign and its good for growing the sport. I respect all teams who are doing it. I just dont want the red wings doing it. Its fine for others, but i dont want that lifestyle for me or my family.
