Z and D for the C

What would you rather have? One line rated 10/10 and one 3/10, or two lines rated 9/10?

Meh, we've won 10 games without datsyuk. We can win another. No I kid. Like said, datsyuk provides way more than just goals. I think we're okay without him though. The silver lining would be Flip on the first line with Hoss.

Flip's and Lilja's made me LOL, literally.

Definitely a great read.

I think something very important is being completely overlooked here: The wings scored on an odd man rush!!!!

Sammy deserves the goal from top to bottom. Awesome play to break Hudler and flip for the 2 on 1, and a great sell by Flip to open up for the pass/shot.

What a play.

The hawks are the underdogs. The wings are the better team. Of course they're going to focus on the hawks, and how a lesser team can upset a better team. Jesus.

Yeah, our three biggest underachievers on one line, I don't see how that is a bad idea.

Babcock is ho'in himself. He needs to change up these lines, I don't care how good Z, Franzen and cleary have been. Dats and Hossa are doing bad enough for the whole team.

If we had a 4th OT win, I would be so happy.

Datsyuk

^ Three letters are easier to type than 30. Most of the time they're pretty obvious. No idea what the hell FSH is though.

Zetterberg Datsyuk Cleary Franzen Flip Hossa Sammy Huds Homer Abds Drapes Helm These are the best lines. Z&D need to start clicking again. Hossa needs to be away from Z&D. Homer is good, he just can't match up 5 on 5 with the opposition's better defenders. I think this 3rd line would perform well as they all play better when they're off the top 6 for even strength. Then you have your bang line which has energy and can chip in a goal once in a while. Helm can make awesome single plays once in a while but he isn't experienced enough to be on a goal scoring line. This lineup just screams depth and balance.

The point didn't stand in the first place. It would be silly to think that NBC wouldn't interview Crosby or "show him scoring goals" during a pittsburgh game. It isn't silly to think that NBC wouldn't interview Crosby or "show him scoring goals" during a game that has nothing to do with pittsburgh. Crosby was interviewed because he is Sidney Crosby. You're fugazi (google that one) if you think otherwise.

Well, it is only 5pm on a sunday.

I just can't imagine us losing to the blackhawks. I mean, not even a single game.

I think the "eating crow" thing is stupid and cliche so I won't say I am or something, but I was no doubt completely wrong about Osgood and I readily and freely admit it. He has been amazing and I will never doubt him again.

If you don't seen that the intentions behind interviewing crosby, during a game he has nothing to do with, are not to get thoughts about staal v staal or about his team, but just to market him to a national audience, you're dense. There is nothing more to it, no amount of sarcasm will make you seem correct. That interview would have never taken place if his name wasn't Sideny Crosby, and it undoubtedly annoys the s*** out of a lot of people. These are facts.

AND THE PITTSBURGH PENGUINS WIN THE 2008 ST-wait?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnover Giveaway = turnover. You gave the puck away, you turned the puck over [to the other team].

WOW the best chance by datsyuk this entire playoffs.

I don't see the difference.

8-0 turnovers...

OH SID YOU'RE JUST SO FUNNY AND CUTE AND SMART AND YOU'RE SO GOOD AT INTERVIEWS DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE OTHER BOYS THEIR JUST JEALOUS