-
Content Count
4,106 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Calendar
Articles
Store
Downloads
Member Map
Everything posted by Doggy
-
Damn you're obsessed with McCarty. You bring him up in every thread.
-
R4L is the most negtive poster I've seen around here. He puts a negative spin into every thread. I wouldn't worry about him.
-
It's a pretty pricey contract if you ask me. Joffrey Lupul seems destined to underachieve his entire career from what I've seen. But he may prove me wrong.
-
Well maybe the OP didn't word the title the best. It's not the end of the world.
-
Gilmour was one of the most popular Leafs of all time. And Clark was no slouch.
-
I believe this thread is more about the top 3 forwards and not about chemistry or even positions. It's not meant to be what's likely to be out there.
-
My memory ain't great. I made that post after watching it again. Again, what is the comment based on? Edit: I have a feeling you'll argue again so I'll pre-empt you and end it (sorry for the crap pic, it's from youtube). The puck hit the net just to the left of the bottle. It was pretty much a perfect shot and that's what Sykora is there for. And again, he waited for Zetterberg to go down for the shot block and then shot it over him.
-
Sykora has a great shot. He is one of the last opponents you'd want the puck to have gone to in that situation because of his ability to put something like that away. What is this comment based on? Of course the bloody shot was aimed. He took the pass, waited for a Red Wing to drop for the block and shot it over him. It didn't have to make its way past anyone else besides Osgood.
-
^Lol. That's funny. They're not just adult - they're middle-aged mutant ninja turtles.
-
Lol. Whoops.
-
Havlat, Teows, Kane is a pretty good top 3. So is Lecavalier, Prospal and St. Louis.
-
What about Mike York and Anson Carter? They'd have to crack the lineup. Also Bob Johnson could be the coach. For an 'all-time' team you cannot forget Al Iafrate.
-
Nah screw that! And screw you SWF!! Damn foreigner.
-
Hi Dr. Rabs. ZF40 - chase him, be desperate. Guys love that. That's how Rabs got me!
-
I don't know what hooped means but Vancouver has tonnes of cap space. More than Montreal.
-
That doesn't make sense. If a player can only fight then he'll be signed for close to minimum and much cheaper than a skilled player. And if he doesn't play in the NHL, it doesn't count towards the cap. So how is it a waste of cap space? The rest I agree with though.
-
Well I was saying it with a thick Southern American hick accent (couldn't you tell?) therefore it doesn't matter where I'm from. Now git outta hayer Commie!
-
Shut up out of towner. We don't take kindly to your type around here.
-
Lol. One of those guys hey? So is UK a pommy version of him then?
-
So what's with him?
-
No but Hudler plays with a heavier jersey because 26 needs more material than 11. If his jersey were as light as Cleary's he would be scoring a point every 24.7 mins. Hudler>Cleary
-
Oh man, now here comes the pts/min comparison to all NHLers making $2m+ from eva thus proving you are wrong.
-
I knew this was coming. Eva, for someone who is so focused on stats you've really stuffed this one up if you think this proves Hudler is better than Semin offensively. Keep it simple, in 06-07 Hudler could've scored 50 points with Semin's time as opposed to Semin's 73 points. So I'm gonna have to ask - what are you trying to say with this particular pointless set of stats? And I didn't think Ovechkin was paired with Semin very much at all. Regardless, I think this TOI extrapolation is flawed. It doesn't mean he would've gotten anything. It means he could have. There's a big difference. Huds getting more ice time would be nice but for him, but to give him too many more minutes is probably not what is best for the team. Unfortunately. And can I just say - I really do like Jiri Hudler and do not want him traded. Young Guns, I wasn't disagreeing with you - it just seemed at first glance that you were underestimating some other players but in hindsight you weren't really.