thedisappearer

I'd say that practice is a good place to have a "real opportunity", as it is with most healthy scratches. Apparently, Babcock isn't impressed. Obviously, you are a better judge of performance you haven't seen. Tell me if the next season of Dexter will be any good.

Dan Cleary hates you. He told me so.

SO May doesn't haven't balls and ESAD proved it? What?

Na-uh, *YOU'RE* being defensive!

I know. Now tell Micah that. Well, he was dealing in definitions, but I'm willing to lump it together.

OK, that makes a little more sense to me, but doesn't sway me that much. And we can't act like the offensive issues mean anything towards goaltending. I don;t care how much support they get, I care how they play. Howard's playing better. Dude, you over analyze.

Well, I have no issue with enforcers as long as they can play, and there is a thread saying he's the MVP because of his -3. True story.

THIS

LOL. It's funny when you do it, but rude when someone applies it to you. Got it. I bolded your continued FAIL. Wait, stay on topic. Ok. May has been a great addition. He's not gonna play in the playoffs, and he won't help us get there. I still love the guy, and want to see him over Maltby next year. I have not noticed us being cheapshotted less. I never saw it happen too much before. I see people get all pissed when a Wing gets hit cleanly... see Janik's last fight. I think *that* is pathetic.

Bolded my apology. So sorry I screwed up an abbreviation.

I've had a few beers. Explain, without saying HE PLAYED WORSER TEAMS, how this explains Howard's better GAA and save percentage.

I'm far from anti-enforcer, but if you start a thread about how Brad May is our MVP *because* he's -3... yeah, Imma LOL all over that. If you're talking about me.

Or, you could look at what I responding to, realized I read 3 sentences of your "I'm smarter than you" schtick and realized you are a pompous ******. PS- More misspellings. I'll bold them for you. When you want to bust balls over words, as you did, please spell them correctly. PSS- Italicizing "you", in reference to me, is supposed to hurt my feelings, right? Like, you know who I am and what I stand for and who I am as a *person*... and you don't approve? You want to give me s*** for referencing an internet meme ON THE INTERNET but your behavior is mature, adult behavior. Gotcha!

STOP BEING RATIONAL!!! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE AND IT'S ALL [insert Red Wing's name]!!!

You just gave me a boner. Happy new year's to you, too.

We'll never survive without his -3.

You want to argue the finer points and subtleties of definitions, but can't spell 'faintest' correctly. Cool story, bro.

No ******* way. You are beyond stupid. The Red Wings were INSANELY successful in the 60's, 70's, *and* 80's. They made the playoffs, like, 8 times. BOOYAH! That's TOTALLY what I want. Oh, wait. Those are the only full decades the Wings never won a Cup. Never mind.

Ridiculous thread has gotten very ridiculous.

How many concussions did he have again? 9? 10?

Nothing either Howard or Halak have done makes them 'top notch' goalies. We don't have one top notch goalie, let's not pretend we may have two any time soon.

Two shorties for Helmer! WOOT!!!

LOL

So the illegal hit is justified because Kopitar initiated contact?

He deserved, putting his face where he *knew* elbows could be.