Frozen-Man

You didn't add valuable hockey analysis or even attempt to do so. All you ever do is trash the Wings players, coaches, and management. It is a constant attempt, sometimes under the veil of hockey "analysis" and sometimes just blatantly for the purpose of trolling. Perhaps you notice your comments are never positive, even handed, or anything but degrading and denigrating some aspect of the Wings organization. Edit: You are correct, however, that I did not add "valuable hockey analysis" countering the statement that "without home ice advantage they are not beating the Canucks and that is a fact." It was a silly statement and not deserving of a serious response so I didn't provide one. However, great analysis on your "Hudler blows" comment real valuable analysis.

Sadly, this is very toned down for Left Winger, you should go back and read some of the stuff he wrote a few years ago at the trade deadline. That is not what it comes down to, the Wings could have vastly improved in the near-term had they traded every prospect and pick that they had. To look at it so simplistically is very near-sighted.

Maybe not in any given year (although a lot of teams would disagree even with that) but how about over a 5, 10, or even 20 year span. . . . ? Yeah that is what I thought and that is why the Wings are perpetually great, because they have a more vision than just instant gratification.

I agree not any big changes for them as it relates to this year. In fact, contrary to a lot of opinion here, even though I wish we could have gotten the goal scorer or gritty bottom 6 guy, I still think the Wings did about as well as any contender in the West with their pickup of Quincey.

Per Helene St. James ‏ (@freepwings) quoting Babcock on the Trade Deadline and the too high prices:

Per Helene St. James ‏ @freepwings

Instant Classic. :rotflmao:

Really, that seems crazy especially after they just got rid of a D man unless they are going to package it for someone big defense wise.

I don't really care that much but don't understand why the Wings would do this unless it is to clear up roster space?

This one is pretty funny:

Didn't see that coming.

Thanks.

Not doubting you but where did you hear that?

Also from KuklasKorner

I thought they were out? New information? Are they back in?

That is the inference from this post: You articulate no good trade that the Wings could make, nothing that has been offered that the Wings should but didn't accept, and everyone is agreeing that sellers prices are ridiculously high this year (at least up to this point). The problem is that since all you do is whine, complain, moan, flame, and generally do whatever you can to be negative (hence the -640 rating) no one gives you the benefit of the doubt that you might just this once be making a reasonable and rational proposition.

Per Nick Kypreos ‏

If you don't like it you could always just leave. I doubt many tears would be shed over your constant trolling.

That is what I was thinking but it looks like they may be making a big push for Nash as well.

Wow that is a lot to give up.

Per Bob McKenzie: No idea what Nashville might be giving up though.