XxGoWingsxX

I was in another thread talking about the impact of our injuries and something occurred to me. How is it that datsyuk never gets hurt? The dude is in the mix all over the ice, throwing his body around and despite the fact that hes a slippery little bastard (see the youtube video link at the bottom lol) , he still gets hit big sometimes. The dude is like a Russian scoring, dangling, undressing machine. I'm 6'4 225 and in pretty good shape and I have to admit, if I took some of the bumps he does on the ice i'd probably snap a leg or something lol. In my defense though, I do have long massive ass legs. I still get goosebumps every time i hear mickey go" woahhh" then hear Ken Daniels say this "Ohh, and Grier and Clowe collide, as Datsyuk deked em both and grier's hurt", then Mickey "Well, Houdini's at it again" LoL This video give me a man crush on Datsyuk, in a totally hetero way lol. Can someone please tell me how I would embed this video? I tried the embed link off of youtube but it only showed HTML code when I posted

Actually, Saying that putting conks in won't change how the team plays might be a little off. Conks has been very consistent this year save from a couple mishaps and bad games but when He is in net, I see more confidence in the D and they push forward harder and it results in more scoring chances. I see the offense able to take risks on the forecheck and be able to go deep in the offensive zone w/o having to worry AS much about backchecking (because they have more of that confidence) which results in our offense turning on the heat even higher.

LoL, ryan

Great post dude....this is an interesting read

WOW, these refs aren't against us, they're just ******* horrible...we had 6 plus ozzie out there

well, thanks cheli for givin them the chance

cheli wtf

Electrophile, read my post again about them not getting out of the 1st round....somehow i accidentally deleted part of it.

YES FRANZEN

he can play amazing all game if he wants but to give up crap like that EVERY GAME is inexcusable

Wings WILL NOT make it out of the 1st round playing like this. They've just shown everyone that they don't give a s*** about winning anymore. I feel bad for hossa

I have officially given up on osgood

OMFG

also, we had 3 wings screening ozzie. pathetic

oh wait, that was more koko's fault

wow way to give them the puck ericcson

i can't believe they got away with a hold and a trip RIGHT IN THE REFS FACE. Good thign pavs drilled him tho

Thanks ryan

Hey all, I laid down a couple hours before the game because I feel like garbage and somehow slept past my 4:50 alarm. I caught the last 5 of the 2nd and we're up yayyy...but how have they looked thus far?

Thats a good point although i've never noticed his training regimen. But then again, i wasn't paying that close of attention. So yeah, that does make sense.

LoL, yayyyy. It was a sign then, that I made that typo lol

Xitium, its 901 then...thanks. I just didn't look that high lol. Its because usually during the fsn+ games I would just watch a stream online but they're few and far between lately plus, I finally got the digital box with DVR and HD.

Good to see a fan from another team on here with so much class. I have nothing but respect for fans like you man. You're welcome here any time. And yes, I see it the same way as you. The wings Offense has looked flat the past few games and I see them coming out of the gate swinging tonight, and Putting the pressure on early. Even if the wings don't get the early lead, the Preds will wear out quickly due to the back to back game and The wings will Regain their scoring touch that they've been w/o as of late. I also smell a couple long overdue PP goals tonight too. I also predict the wings to win 4-1.

Ok so, the game is on FSN+ right? Cuz i just looked on my digital guide on my tv (I have comcast) and on both FSN, and FSN+ it says the pistons are on there. So then I checked tvguide.com and it says the same thing. Is it an error or are we really not going to be able to watch a wings HOME game? also, FSN+ on comcast is channel 201 correct?

Yeah, you do have a point on that though.