Esquire

HoF Booster
  • Content Count

    1,198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Esquire

  1. Esquire

    2/5 GDT: Red Wings 0 at Predators 3

    Lovely
  2. Esquire

    2/5 GDT: Red Wings 0 at Predators 3

    Cleary is a beast.
  3. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    AH f***!! NOT A 5 on 3!!!
  4. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    Had to, didn't you?
  5. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    And there it is. 4
  6. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    DRAPES!!! FATHER TIME!!!
  7. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    Bahahahahaha. Campoli's goal was his first in 43 games and first at home in a year??? Red Wings are all about firsts...
  8. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    29th ranked offensive team in the NHL has 3 on the Wings...in the first.
  9. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    H4lf way there...
  10. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    Excellent "watch the puck defense" there
  11. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    nother beauty
  12. Esquire

    2/2 GDT: Franzen 5 + Red Wings 2 (7) at Senators (5)

    Just win. LGW
  13. I'm doing so much fist pumping and crotch thrusting right now it's unreal!!!
  14. Esquire

    1/26 GDT: Devils 1 at Red Wings 3

    I'm hoping this isn't the patented "Last Game Before a Break" Wings hockey. GO WINGS GO!!!
  15. Esquire

    Wings Have To Toughen Up Soon

    I think it's this Wing fan who's become "way too comfortable in the spa-like atmosphere". 19 seasons of playoffs among other accolades and they still feel the need to nit pick. Sure old players watching may get angry with seeing guys get pushed around but in the words of Biggie: things done changed. IMO, I prefer the way things are now. Sure there are times when I wish that we'd drop the gloves but I think that having a "tough guy" in the lineup doesn't always ensure the safety of your players. Just my opinion though. Come to think of it, this article doesn't really connect the authors reason for wanting toughness to anything other than seeming like it's just venting. I mean, we're winning and we haven't had any players out of the lineup due to headhunting so the reason for wanting toughness is...?
  16. Esquire

    1/22 GDT: Blackhawks 4 at Red Wings 1

    MOTHER FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
  17. Esquire

    1/22 GDT: Blackhawks 4 at Red Wings 1

    HUUUUUUUUUDS BAAHHH!!
  18. Esquire

    1/22 GDT: Blackhawks 4 at Red Wings 1

    Boned