Esquire

HoF Booster
  • Content Count

    1,198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Esquire

  1. Esquire

    2012 NHL Trade Deadline Thread - February 27th, 3:00 PM ET

    Glenn Healy says that the Jackets were asking for 2 top six forwards, 2 top 30 prospects, and a 1st round pick for Nash. Yikes.
  2. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    Juuuuuust made it.
  3. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    It's on ok game I guess.
  4. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    Pot, meet kettle.
  5. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    HOLY s***!!! Are you all seeing this!?!?! JAN MURSAK FAN CLUB!!!
  6. Esquire

    Do Maple Leaf fans deserve better?

    Ron Wilson has been fired...
  7. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    AGENT SMITH!!
  8. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    Check your PM's
  9. Esquire

    3/2 GDT : Wild 0 at Red Wings 6

    Check your PM's
  10. Esquire

    Do Maple Leaf fans deserve better?

    5-4 Chicago wins over the Leafs. The hits just keeps on coming...
  11. Esquire

    Post-TDT: Red Wings stand pat, no additions

    Maybe he's highly rated within the organization because the Wings bring through fewer grinders/tough guy's than others. I'm purely guessing here since I have little, if any, knowledge about this prospect.
  12. Esquire

    2/28 GDT : Red Wings 5 at Blue Jackets 2

    Via Helene St. James ‏on Twitter:
  13. Esquire

    Do Maple Leaf fans deserve better?

    I'm going to give you exactly 5 minutes to edit/delete this post.
  14. Esquire

    2/28 GDT : Red Wings 5 at Blue Jackets 2

    Nashville lost tonight too. Sweet.
  15. Esquire

    Johan Franzen Depreciation

    Wings' Johan Franzen dropped to third line
  16. Esquire

    2012 NHL Trade Deadline Thread - February 27th, 3:00 PM ET

    Hodgson is going to be a STUD. Good for Buffalo.
  17. Esquire

    Vancouver sweeping the rug?

    Jimmy says:
  18. Esquire

    2012 NHL Trade Deadline Thread - February 27th, 3:00 PM ET

    As per Bob McKenzie on Twitter: Wonder if the Wings have shown any interest at all.
  19. Esquire

    2/23 GDT : Canucks 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    QUINSANITY!!!
  20. Esquire

    2012 NHL Trade Deadline Thread - February 27th, 3:00 PM ET

    Never have, never will. Your opinion, as always, is a valued gift. As you were.
  21. Esquire

    2/23 GDT : Canucks 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Make no mistake, it's Eva
  22. Esquire

    2/23 GDT : Canucks 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    dontforgettahitthenetbuddy
  23. Esquire

    2/23 GDT : Canucks 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Carter and Richards....UNITE!! lolz
  24. Esquire

    2012 NHL Trade Deadline Thread - February 27th, 3:00 PM ET

    "buttload of cap space"? Is that an exact figure or more guess work on your part? Holland didn't spend that "buttload" for two very apparent reasons: 1) There were no defenseman available for his price that could replace Rafalski. Candidates include Ehrhoff (10yr/$40mil), Wisniewski (6 years, $33mil,), Kaberle (3 years, $12.75mil), Jovanovski (4 years, $16.5mil). Teams that paid those players were desperate for defensive upgrades. The Wings were not desperate, thus, no overpayment. In fact, they chose to "overpay" Ericsson, one of their own rather than dump him and go chase one of the aforementioned players. 2) He was saving that "buttload" for...wait for it...this exact time of the year! Had he spent that money last year, this conversation might not even exist. Saying "signing these players aren't going to be good deals" is more guess work. You have "0% chance" of knowing anything regarding what the Wings will offer these players or what they are looking for. You're out of your element Donny.