syntax

Member
  • Content Count

    4,795
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by syntax

  1. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    Correct. Knowing how reactive the boards are SHOULD STOP HIM FROM OVERCOMMITTING.
  2. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    True, but Ozzie should know how reactive these boards are by now.
  3. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    Not phantom. Cheli had one hand and no control of his stick.
  4. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    Terrible slop in our zone. WTF.
  5. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    We were a little slow and sloppy out there, but besides being f***ed by the refs multiple times (BS pk, multiple ducks non-calls) I'll take it.
  6. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    If you're a Sammy hater, take his salary and divide it the number of points he has this year...... and then shut the eff up.
  7. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    LOL. Your state has NO NATURAL ICE.YOU SHOULDN'T EVEN HAVE A TEAM.YOU ARE THE BANDWAGON TEAM. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOT SAMMMMMMMMMMMYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!
  8. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    WOOOOOT!!!!
  9. syntax

    WCSF GAME 2 GDT: Ducks 4 at Red Wings 3 (3OT)

    We got this one made. Wings will come out hard and rock the Ducks. Hopefully we won't have to play against the refs all game like we did in game one. The non-calls against the Ducks were atrocious.
  10. syntax

    WCQF GAME 4 GDT: Red Wings 6 at Blue Jackets 5

    That sounds EXTREMELY irresponsible. I hope it did not happen. I could understand if we were DOWN 0-3 and had no back up goalie.
  11. syntax

    The Beard is Back: LGW Official Tracker

    Here's mine. A week old. Nice and half grey. Ah, they joys of aging.
  12. syntax

    WCQF GAME 4 GDT: Red Wings 6 at Blue Jackets 5

    Littering the ICE. NO CLASS IN COLUMBUS.
  13. syntax

    WCQF GAME 4 GDT: Red Wings 6 at Blue Jackets 5

    With O'Halloran reffing AGAINST the Wings? Come on.
  14. syntax

    WCQF GAME 4 GDT: Red Wings 6 at Blue Jackets 5

    Woot Captain Nick!!
  15. syntax

    WCQF GAME 4 GDT: Red Wings 6 at Blue Jackets 5

    So we'll just have to beat the Jackets and O'Hallaran. SWEEP INCOMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  16. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    Nope!! Irrational intolerance is good by me
  17. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    Very good first 2 periods. Third I thought was a little shaky. 3 wins down, 13 to go! See you guys on Thursday!
  18. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    That's what they call a MYTH.
  19. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    Bah. Too many blown clearing chances.
  20. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    WOW. Calling that close is a huge injustice to the word close.
  21. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    Almost makes me wish it was a closer game to prevent that sort of thing....... NOT!
  22. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    Good call. Still not something I want to see though. Makes me nervous.
  23. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    100% agreed. No worries. I wish they'd make Bettman lead of the business side and Scotty Bowman or someone in charge of hockey itself. Yep. I DO NOT WANT the Wings in defense mode in this series. AT ALL.
  24. syntax

    WCQF GAME 3 GDT: Red Wings 4, Blue Jackets 1

    1. Most league revenue EVER (inflation adjusted) 2. Deal with McDonalds a.k.a best advertising deal ever for the NHL 3. NHL has more arena attendance than the NBA (first time ever)(http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/article/119006) 4. ESPN REGRETS dumping hockey becuase of the $ Bettman has brought in. And you were saying?