syntax

Member
  • Content Count

    4,795
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by syntax

  1. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Hossa equipment problem? He's not on the bench.
  2. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    DAMN COMPOSITE STICKS!
  3. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    I thought it was Cleary also. When the announcer at the Joe say 'Penalty on number 11" right before we go to commercial...I do not think 'Kirk Maltby'.
  4. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Anyone else have no game clock on the screen?
  5. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Ugg another PK. On Cleary again?
  6. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    If that was Homer in front of Ozzie, that would've been interference.
  7. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    I saw that, I thought he was doing Groucho Marx for the players on the bench.
  8. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Bad hold by Cleary.
  9. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Goal Kronwall!!
  10. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    Nice save Ozzie!
  11. syntax

    4/9 GDT: Predators 4 at Red Wings 3 (SO)

    I wish we could win and the Ducks not make the playoffs.
  12. syntax

    Detroit's Defensmen

    So all of you are saying that the most successful team in hockey history, the Montreal Canadiens, initiated tracking a 'worthless' stat in 1962? And then the NHL adopted this worthless statistic? (It became a tracked stat during the 67-68 season.) Plus-minus is a measure of dominance, not defense. +/- is obviously dependant on how your team is performing. While I agree that +/- isn't exactly a fair individual statistic, it SURELY tells you how a player is playing. In a nutshell, that's what +/- is. Winning and losing. If you are a +, YOU and your team are scoring more than your opponent and you're a WINNER. If you're a minus, YOU and your team are getting scored on more than you're scoring and you're a LOSER. There's a reason +/- is starting to be tracked in basketball, and is used by law firms to judge teams of litigators.
  13. syntax

    Blackhawks disrespect the octopus!

    We'll be the ones laughing when they lose their last two regular-season games to us.
  14. syntax

    What does everyone think of Ballard's hit on Malkin?

    Perfectly executed hip-check IMO. Totally clean. Makes me miss Vlad. *****-boy Crosby got his face knocked in a little too, which is nice.
  15. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Think of it as supporting the golf industry in the slumping economy. Great game guys!! All around goodness tonight. See you guys on Thursdays' GDT. PS: Chris Osgood Saves: 32 Save Pct.: 96.970
  16. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Lids empty net!
  17. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Amen. Good to see a heavy forcheck with 2:38 left in the game. OCTOPUS ON THE ICE!
  18. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Cheli got to a loose puck first!!!!! I HAVE PROOF!
  19. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Killer lob pass to Drapes.
  20. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Heinken walk-in beer room commercial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Stupid McDonald's Filet O' Fish commercial.
  21. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    And they get one back, BOOO!
  22. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Pavel to Hoss!!
  23. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    LOL!
  24. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    I made a point a few games ago that it looked like Ericsson was getting a Crosby molester 'stache and begged him to shave. I'm not sure we have enough time left in the season for Big Rig to grow a beard. Mebbe by 2010-2011 if he starts now.
  25. syntax

    4/6 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Sabres 1

    Name one fighter with a 100% win record. HOSS!!!