Ms_Hockey

Member
  • Content Count

    1,675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ms_Hockey

  1. Ms_Hockey

    Datsyuk looked really good

    I couldn't agree more. Datsyuk has been amazing on the ice. Here's to Dats getting a hat trick next game and livening his spirits! :beerbuddy:
  2. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    Exactly. I read through that whole thread. These people honestly believe that there's some ILOVETHEWINGS reffing going on. I'm not even kidding you. People are leaving comments like "The Ducks know every time they're on the ice that they have to fight of referee bias towards the Wings." Wtf? You lost because your team couldn't get it together and produce, not because we got all the calls. We had an EQUAL amount of power plays.
  3. Ms_Hockey

    Datsyuk looked really good

    Babcock touched on this in the post-game interview. He said that it doesn't matter what he tells Datsyuk about how he played, Dats doesn't feel he's of any value unless he scores.. so he just wants him to score. He said he's doing an amazing job of making chances for everyone else and if he just waits around, he'll get his too.
  4. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Where's all the post-game stuff, yo?
  5. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Mad props to Christensen if that's the case.
  6. Ms_Hockey

    Grind Line's future

    D-Mac is probably done. Drapes' contract is up in 2011 and Malts' contract is up in 2010. After their contracts are done, they'll probably retire.
  7. Ms_Hockey

    Do you re-sign Marian Hossa?

    I love Hossa. I love his snap and release. I love how clutch he's been for this team. And yeah, he has his dry spots - but he's a great hockey player, through and through. His chemistry with this team is undeniable, in my opinion. I would do what it took to keep him as long as he would be willing to drop down his price tag. We don't have the cap space to give him what he could get elsewhere, but if he'd be willing to take a couple million less - then I'd say sure, sign him up. It really all depends on what the lowest he'd take is.
  8. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Can't beat a #16, eh?
  9. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Man, that number 7 is just SO sexy.
  10. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    First of all, you need to calm WAY down. Secondly, me posting a thread about how a Ducks fan thinks the league wants the Wings to advance is hardly "playing conspiracies". If anything, THEY'RE playing conspiracies and I'm just laughing at it. I don't buy into this whole "the league wants certain teams to advance" BS.. and when I come across it, I find it incredibly amusing. The Red Wings are FAR from favored in the league. They've been a dominant hockey club for 11+ years. In any sport, that's not considered "good". It doesn't do much to keep competition alive and keep people interested. THAT'S why it was hilarious to see. The NHL is a business - just like everything else. Having a long-standing hockey dynasty is NOT good for competitive business. Plain and simple.
  11. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    Well, thread took an unexpected turn.
  12. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    I, for one, have never once said that the league wants the team we just lost to to advance. Ever. If other people on this forum have, then okay. But I haven't.. and I personally found that post beyond hilarious. I'm not upset - I'm amused.
  13. Ms_Hockey

    Dan Cleary gets a little redemption

    Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week.. leave your donations in the hat.
  14. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    I'm glad you guys found this just as hilarious as I did. (Most of you).
  15. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    I don't recall anybody saying the league wanted the Ducks to win.. but I know that LGW gets pretty damn pathetic after a loss.
  16. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    You got further than I did. They didn't even validate my account.
  17. Ms_Hockey

    You guys have GOT to see this.

    Shhhh. Don't ruin my fun.
  18. Ms_Hockey

    Dan Cleary gets a little redemption

    Even if we gave the Ducks that goal back, it's still 3-1 at the end of the game. Quit your bitchin', quackers.
  19. Ms_Hockey

    Cleary's falling problem

    Agreed. He can fall every other second and I won't care.. he puts up a considerable amount of goals, the highest plus/minus in the postseason (on the Wings), and puts more effort into his shifts than almost anybody. Keep falling, Cleary. I'll keep lovin' you.
  20. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Nothing bad to say? No player bashing? Who are you and what did you do with Mindfly?
  21. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    I love the RW crowd. "BORN AND RAISED IN SOUTH DETROIT."
  22. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    LOLOLOL. Ducks board: "That was clear interference." "That's total BS." Trust me, if it was remotely goaltender interference, Danny O would've been ALL over it. Quit your bitchin'.
  23. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Knock it off with the "this is just like 2007" bulls***. It's getting old - fast. This is not the same team as 2007 - our offensive depth alone tells you that. So let's stop with our Duck-fan BS.
  24. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Lol. Ducks fans keep complaining that we dive. You've had more PPs than we have, so shut up. Wings need to keep putting pressure on the Ducks. They've only had one shot on goal this period - let's keep it that way.
  25. Ms_Hockey

    WCSF GAME 5 GDT: Ducks 1 at Red Wings 4

    Crap.