-
Content Count
3,365 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Calendar
Articles
Store
Downloads
Member Map
Everything posted by jollymania
-
here: It is pretty much what BA thinks is the best overall brewery in north america, out of 151 choices initially apparently founders takes it http://beeradvocate.com/forum/read/3349188
-
anyone watching this thread on BA? An all Michian final: http://beeradvocate.com/forum/read/3347009 I went with founders by a hair, i think Sam Adams was out in the first round while founders just crushed all of its opponent and Bell's took down goliath, Russian River.
-
yes yes yes yes it hit my stick
-
Just got home from work, I see Tatar scored, it gets me pumped to watch this one
-
http://larrymurphylovesfriesandhotdogs.ytmnd.com/
-
read my quote on the last page: It wasn't dirty by IIHF rules because this rule doesn't constitute what is dirty or not, but what is legal or not. when has stuff like this occurred? Congratulations of coming up with hyperbolic situations. IT wasn't late either so you in head timing must be a few clicks off. It doesn't matter how far the puck is, you could have the puck be a foot form you and get checked late and have it all the way down the ice and be checked in due time. The best solution is to have all players skate with their heads up, not make more and more rules and over regulate the sport. If the idiotic matt stajans cant follow the rules then let them get their bells rung.
-
Zetterberg questionable, Rafalski game-time decision
jollymania replied to Rick Zombos Ghost's topic in General
if rafalski plays and z doesn't jsut play ericsson at forward -
why would a hit be unnecessary, there is always a reason for a hit, it is an integral part of the sport, it provides intimidation, wearing down of the opponent, taking them out of the play/off the puck, this one would fall under all 3 so yes t was necessary
-
it wasn't dirty at all, hits like that have been in hockey since the dawn of time
-
im saying the IIHF rules are wrong, not that it was a bad call
-
clean hit, shouldn't be a penalty, but pierre is wrong, there was a bit of head contact, but a totally clean hit, i dk why you would ever suspend something like that
-
try bell's porter, that one is an easy drinker
-
yeah, but people from the east coast drink it like it is worth something, you best bet is to chug them and go to the store and pick up a 6er of bell's lager
-
it is also one of the worst beers, on par with a budweiser, and a skunky green bottle to boot
-
Babcock with the death stare
-
-
Congratz
-
I didn't realize that was Mursak on that backcheck, that was phenomenal speed, I thought it was miller or helm at first
-
i think mursak will be good, hopefully he plays physical in the 3rd/4th line role
-
i thought it was filppula's brother according to you, at any rate I think Holland will make an appropriate decision
-
too much nhl on tonight for me to care
-
Aparently there is another angle that shows kaleta looking at blake before he gets hit, that doesn't take away from it being a boarding but kaleta knew it was coming, shoudl have been a penalty, but not a suspension