What does the Pens pulling out a win at the Igloo have to do with my arguement? I dont feel my post was "all high and mighty." I responded to a posted that basically claimed the refs cost the wings game 3, and generally speaking, made a few excuses for the Wings 2 losses. I simply came back with that if the refs cost the Wings game 3, then it could be argued that they cost the Pens game 2. Simply pointed out that there have been missed calls both ways. Not even gonna address the diving issue.
I agree that the Wings are the deeper team. Top to Bottom, you guys have more talent, but i think alot of the Pens are underrated. This series is far from over, but the Wings have to start playing like im used to seeing them. To me, it seems like they chasing the puck more this year. They just dont seem to be able to maintain the same level of puck possession i remember from last year. If anyone can come back from being down 2-0, its the Pens, especially with the way Crosby and Malkin are playing. Crosby may not be getting the points, but it's not from lack of trying. It's from his teammates not burying the puck when he sets them up.
The reffing has been awful all Post season. I'd like to see more penalties called both ways. There is no excuse for anyone missing the 6men on the ice. Cooke's hit the Holmstram's head in game 3 was up there too (may have the players wrong on that one)