esteef

HoF Booster
  • Content Count

    6,153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Everything posted by esteef

  1. esteef

    3/10 GDT : Blue Jackets 3 at Red Wings 2 (SO)

    LOL! esteef
  2. esteef

    3/10 GDT : Blue Jackets 3 at Red Wings 2 (SO)

    The 3rd line does. But babs could f***in care less, he's too busy blowing his veterans. esteef
  3. esteef

    3/10 GDT : Blue Jackets 3 at Red Wings 2 (SO)

    Both top lines spending their shifts in the defensive zone. Probably because of Columbus's offensive prowess right? MOVE TATAR UP GOD DAMMIT!!!!! esteef
  4. esteef

    3/10 GDT : Blue Jackets 3 at Red Wings 2 (SO)

    3rd line best pressure already. What's babs do? Spreads the suck to 2 lines.. esteef
  5. esteef

    3/10 GDT : Blue Jackets 3 at Red Wings 2 (SO)

    And yesterday wasn't the debut of the 2nd line either. esteef
  6. esteef

    Datsyuk - Cleary - Abdelkader

    ^ Abby's avatar! esteef
  7. esteef

    Datsyuk - Cleary - Abdelkader

    "Getting Sammy back was our deadline acquisition. He shoots the puck, can play the point on the power play and has a veteran presence." --Ken Holland esteef
  8. esteef

    3/9 GDT : Red Wings 0 at Blue Jackets 3

    This. Every scrub third liner is not Holmstrom. esteef
  9. esteef

    Datsyuk - Cleary - Abdelkader

    Our top 2 lines have what, 1 goal in six games? Nope, no problem there. esteef
  10. esteef

    3/9 GDT : Red Wings 0 at Blue Jackets 3

    Him and Abby were jawing back and forth, he pointed to the scoreboard and got 10 minutes. esteef
  11. esteef

    3/9 GDT : Red Wings 0 at Blue Jackets 3

    The impotence of the top 2 lines is nothing new, regardless of the defensive mistakes today. esteef
  12. esteef

    Mid-Season Report: Holland Trusting The Farm

    Kronner stepped up with the 1st goal today. ..for Columbus! esteef
  13. esteef

    3/9 GDT : Red Wings 0 at Blue Jackets 3

    How's the scoring on the top 2 lines coming? Still sucking? Carry on... esteef
  14. esteef

    Datsyuk - Cleary - Abdelkader

    Oh yeah, the flukey goal from the dman that bounced off the boards and the goalie's skate and went in. How could I forget about that pure domination? esteef
  15. esteef

    Datsyuk - Cleary - Abdelkader

    We're 2-2 (luckily) in the last four games with that line contributing zero to the offense. Change it. esteef
  16. esteef

    Datsyuk - Cleary - Abdelkader

    Injuries are exactly the time when a player like Tatar should get top line minutes. Perfect opportunity to see what he's got with comparable linemates. When we're healthy he absolutely won't get a chance, we all know that. Underutilization of talent by Babs IMO. esteef
  17. esteef

    3/5 GDT : Avalanche 1 at Red Wings 2

    How did he have a "bad game"? Because he finally didn't put up points? Nonsense. esteef
  18. esteef

    3/5 GDT : Avalanche 1 at Red Wings 2

    We saw Tatar with Dats for like what, 10 seconds? Woooooo! Let it ride Babs! esteef
  19. esteef

    3/5 GDT : Avalanche 1 at Red Wings 2

    Worst part is now that some reporter asked him about putting Tatar with Dats, he surely won't do it now. esteef
  20. esteef

    3/5 GDT : Avalanche 1 at Red Wings 2

    ^ Cleary and Abby! esteef
  21. esteef

    3/3 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1 (SO)

    I am well aware of how it works with Babcock which is precisely my point. Allowing Cleary and Abby to be above Tatar in skill positions is dumb, especially because of injuries. Putting Tatar on the 4th is even dumber. esteef
  22. esteef

    3/3 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1 (SO)

    ^ Tatar on the 4th line would be moronic. He easily beats Abby and Cleary for a spot on the 2nd IMO. esteef
  23. esteef

    Alexei Kovalev to be bought out but FLA

    One of my favorite Kovalev moments: esteef
  24. esteef

    3/3 GDT : Blackhawks 2 at Red Wings 1 (SO)

    I thought of the scoring depth angle too but for that to work at a minimum your top 2 lines need to be scoring, otherwise you are just spreading your offense too thin. Lately the top 2 lines are not scoring. The mystery continues. esteef