edicius

SAMMY AGAIN?!?! I know I'm not alone in saying... WHAT. THE. f***?!

WIN.

Wow. We outshot them 16-4 in that period.

PP upcoming. Was that Flip who made the diving pass in front of Ozzie? That was amazing.

Wow, that was an odd, disjointed sequence. Resulted in a scoring chance for Z, though.

Talbot embarasses himself. Go Kronner.

Zata takes down Crosby with the greatest of ease.

I KNEW IT! Well, we're not going to follow the league's script for this one.

Hey, I have a love/hate relationship with him. Mostly hate, mind you. Were I to have his babies, it would most likely be due to a hate@#$%.

You know...I saw Sammy coming in with the puck and I was like, "Oh well, here goes a scoring chance out the window..." Thank you for proving me wrong, Logo Hunter. PP upcoming.

HOLY s***!!!!!!!! SAMMY DOES IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Guys, we HAVE to get the first goal. Again, I mean.

Wait, did I just hear Datsyuk hit Crosby?

Next time you guys watch that KFC Snacker commercial...look near the right side of one of the final solo shots they have of a sandwich. There's a dollar bill hiding in the lettuce.

I'm gonna come down there and bitchslap Sammy if he doesn't shape up.

OZZIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Golden Boy off for slashing. And guh...no goal. It's the correct call, sadly.

Oh dear god...ANOTHER NO GOAL?!

I hate to sound whiny about this, but there's no other way to say it: It's not fair. Holmstrom is the best he is at what he does LEGALLY AND WITHIN THE RULES. But no matter how cleanly he plays in front of the goaltender, he gets goals called back. Bettman, Campbell and Walkom can deny it all they want, but Holmstrom has a target on his back and he simply won't get the benefit of the doubt any longer. Imagine how much Pittsburgh fans would be bitching if Crosby got called for diving any time he fell down on a scoring opportunity? Well, he has/had a reputation for diving, therefore...

Wonder if Babcock will get fined for that one. But he's totally right. O'Halloran is making calls on what he THINKS MAY HAVE HAPPENED IN FRONT OF THE NET. Thus, he's making assumptions. Not judgment calls, but ASSUMPTIONS. I can accept that sometimes, judgment calls are made and they may be questionable...but this one is just a case of O'Halloran making up s*** in his own head, simply because a goal was scored AND Holmstrom was in front of Fleury.

O'Halloran's striving to fill the void left by McGeough as "The NHL's Most Incompetent Official". That's the only logical conclusion I can come to.

Penalty...high-sticking...against Gill! Amazing!

If the hockey gods are fair, we'll get 3 or 4 PP chances after this.

How was that not a penalty after the play by Hossa?

Hi Malone. Meet Kronwall.