-
Content Count
12,315 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Calendar
Articles
Store
Downloads
Member Map
Everything posted by NeverForgetMac25
-
Crappy finish to this period. Atleast the Wings will have 2:33 of PP time to start the third.
-
WTF.......how the hell did that get in?
-
Wow, and a double minor to boot.
-
QFT Ice in his veins this entire year!
-
Arnott thinks they're "getting close". He must be forgetting that the hottest goaltender in the league is the one stuffing his shots.
-
F*ckin' Ozzie looks great. That guy has ice in his veins this year.
-
There really isn't much to complain about, but tomorrow the Wings should work on finishing their 2-on-1's. We've missed a handful this period.
-
Yeah, but when it gets to that point I just refrain from adding fuel to the fire. You know what's a real challange? Posting on topic after pages of absolute fluff. That comment isn't directed at you in any way.
-
Frustrating miss by Franzen after a slam dunk pass by Cleary. You gotta bury those.
-
Nice kill. I decided its time to start posting.
-
NHL.com states that the game is on FSN. I swear, if I get screwed out of two Wings/Preds games in a row I'm going to be uber-pissed.
-
And just one post later, I posted the following: I figured people would catch my drift a little better than they did, so I clarified. I'm referring to actual game play, not the situation that took place between the Wings and Avs. Again, people take every single word that's posted on these boards so literally all the time. It makes it very difficult to make the simplest of statements.
-
He's still around, its just that his new job doesn't afford him time to post his GDT's. BTW, good to see you doc. Why such a stranger lately?
-
You're GDT doesn't blow, its just that aflac has set the bar so high. He'll be missed, but thanks for posting the GDT.
-
Kinda cool? As PROBIE4PREZ said.......damn that's tight.
-
My point is, why do you need to charge in the first place? Can't you lay out a bone-crushing hit within the legal rules of the game? Retribution for a cheapshot from a past game is nothing like what I'm describing. Seriously people, stop taking every single word of my post so literally. If you don't know what I'm tlaking about, then actually read the rest of my post.
-
Before I forget........Congratulations to the 2007 NFC North Champion Green Bay Packers! The funniest part of the game and a priceless moment!
-
Big hits are fine.......pulling a Pronger-on-Holmstrom like last year is not a good play, and it is illegal.
-
Did you read my follow up to that? I'll post it for you: Aside from breaking up a scoring opportunity how can an illegal charge, rough or elbow be a good thing. I wouldn't lump discretions like fighting into the mix seeing as that its generally away from the play, and doesn't break up a scoring chance. I'm all for fighting or hitting in order to swing the momentum of the game, but that has nothing to do with the illegal plays I'm referring to.
-
Fair enough. Fedorov was the more talented of the two no doubt, but Shanny was the more needed player based on the Wings roster at that point. Shanny brough an element of toughness that the Wings' forwards were lacking, and he was a natural scoring winger. The team had enough solid centermen, but Shanny was the more dire need for that team.
-
Major bummer that Detroit couldn't pull off the upset, but a great all-around win for the Pack. Dominant on all 3 teams (offense, defense, special).
-
From what I remember, those guys actually fashioned those up themselves. It's not as though a store sells them. What you'd have to do is buy the light and the helmet separately, and then hook them up to a battery pack.
-
Ouch! That's a huge hit to the PK.
-
Really, I always thought it kicked it back at you saying you need to type atleast something in the body for a new thread to be created. Oh well.......good news about Draper.
-
To me, its more the other way around. Penalty: No, Dirty: Somewhat, but not totally. That's what I meant by this comment: Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "only", but I figured you'd understand that I was in agreement with you as far the illegal plays that would involve disrupting a scoring chance. But he did make contact with his stick first. I wouldn't doubt that.