• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

vladyfan

Rangers Nailbiter... again!

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

If the Wings are knocked out in this round and the Rangers advance...I will be pulling for the Blue Shirts to go all the way.

Let's Go Rangers!! :clap:

Let's Go Shanny!! :clap:

Screw Shanny. He floated around Detroit for the last 2 or 3 seasons, playing like Lang.

Now all of a sudden he's "motivated" again. Bullsheet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the Be all End all for that No Goal from a Goaltender's Prospective: Watch how the puck is flat coming across the line, but after it pops out from Henry's pad, It is *Standing on end and spinning around like after it hit his pad, it stood up, thereby putting the WHOLE PUCK across the line* I have a feeling that, in the most slim way, that the Puck was on end, against his pad, which was in the net, BUT, once again, there is not substantial evidence that the puck crossed the line. You know, like Roloson's almost a save, except his whole catching glove was in the net.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The puck did not "completely" cross the line or it would've been an easy call from Toronto. The puck is still touching red when it gets obscured from view. Keep in mind, it was only obscured for like a half a second or something before squirting out entirely, and the pad that was obscuring it was not completely in the net either. So you can't use the "puck's under the pad, pad's all the way in the net, therefore, the puck is in the net" logic either.

The right call was made, there was no clear view of the puck all the way across the line, so by the rules, NO GOAL.

esteef

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's great that the Rangers have been playing some fantastic hockey and have come back to tie the series, but fair is fair and that was most definitely a goal. The review on the TV clearly showed the puck cross the line, and then seconds later Henrik covering it up with his pads. It was over the line, therefore it equals a goal. That could be the turning point of the series which I think is crap.

The Rangers were robbed of a goal due to the kicking motion law.... which I think was crap. Buffalo got the benefit of several calls, and even they acknowleged that in their newspapers...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now