

Datsyerberger
HoF Booster-
Content Count
2,925 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Calendar
Articles
Store
Downloads
Member Map
Everything posted by Datsyerberger
-
That wouldn't be anything new.
-
I don't usually go troll hunting, but fortunately my cursor does 2d6 acid and 1d6 fire. When is that Dallas troll going to figure out this isn't the photoshop thread?
-
Knew that was a goal the I saw Zets get the breakaway chance. Dats and Z own Turco 1 on 1
-
Did someone say their numbers were 13, 33, and 25? Now all we need is a D-mac goal!
-
Ooh, killed the penalty and get a PP right after. That's solid.
-
Just be happy they didn't call off another legit goal.
-
Draper's face > Turco.
-
Draper makes the sacrifice! Way to wear that A!
-
Eva, you kick ass. Thanks. There are very few goaltenders, past or present, I would rate over Ozzie. He is without a doubt the most underrated goaltender of all time. Part of that is his own humility, part of it is the utter lack of flair in his style.. which is quite fine, since he gets the job done. He doesn't make the most reflexively spectacular nor the 'biggest' saves, but he's consistent and very solid, and just about always puts forth a strong effort. He's 12th in wins all time for goalies for a reason.. sure, you can claim part of that is because he's had a good team in front of him for a good chunk of his career, which is valid (then again, so did many others in the top 12), but that only goes so far. He still has to be a steady tender not to bum out and lose clutch games when the team isn't 100%, or whatever the case may be. Not only that, but generally, very good teams are going to keep a good goalie behind them, or get rid of them quickly. Hell, look at the Wings. Ozzie has been more consistently with the Wings than any other 'tender in the last 15 years. Let's face it, we've cycled through a good number of hot s*** goalies through this time, yet the fact that Ozzie has been with the Wings so much throughout is, in my opinion, not only a testament to his dedication, but also to his skill; the Wings not only kept him for a while, but later brought him back.. and now he's better than ever. Highly underrated netminder.
-
f*** me, I cursed it.
-
Aaaalooooee..... mooooisturiiizeeerrs.... Arrrrgh, so sick of that ad.
-
LOL! Shot of Hull eating.
-
Kronner must be watching old tapes with Konstantinov, trying to learn.
-
Haha! Cuh-runch!
-
woo sammy! most awesome shot I've ever seen!
-
Oh s*** guys, Holmstrom was somewhere in the Joe at the time, better hope the goal isn't waived off on interference.
-
HOLY s***! OUR 2ND PP UNIT DID SOMETHING! WOOOOHOOOO!
-
"Samuelsson" ... "off the glass" .. gee, there's a coupla things I never expected to hear in the same sentence >_>
-
Let's see what we can do on the PP.
-
I feel massive waves of heat coming from the Detroit locker room during 1st intermission.
-
Did Detroit remember they have a game today?
-
Atleast it was a tough call he got wrong.
-
Well, if it's all luck, then I'll take someone who can "luck" their way to 2 Stanley cups over someone who's "unlucky" enough to never have a single win in his professional career at a particular team's home ice.
-
Alright, this is going to be immature, silly, and light-hearted, but I figure it'd be a good and possibly funny thread with which to pass the time as we wait for the next GDT, as opposed to starting yet another thread about which goalie or (insert name) is awful or what have you. So then, what hockey player names, past or present, do you find terribly amusing? I'll start with a couple of very obvious ones: Tugnutt (That one makes me feel sorry for the announcers) Satan (seeing someone skating around with that on their jersey never fails to amuse me) Peca Cheechoo (sounds like a pokemon, "Cheechoo, I choose you!" "Chee! Chee! Cheechoo!" Tootoo Not as obvious: Letang (I don't know why, but I think his name sounds like a good name for a Klingon... Commander Letang! Qapla'!)
-
I would have voted for that option beforehand, and did now. The lack of review in certain instances of such situations (basically, the ref can say what he feels like calling it a no goal for at the moment.. NO GOAL! oh.. I need a reason? Okay.. well.. I choose.. this one, tonight... and it can't be reviewed) ... well, that's messy, and its asking for just the sorta trouble we had. I'm not going to cry any tears over 10 minutes tacked on to each game since I'm already watching for a couple hours, and I'd rather it be a couple hours + 10 minutes well spent. Quality and all that...