dirtydangles

Member
  • Content Count

    4,139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by dirtydangles

  1. dirtydangles

    Holland retirement watch?

    I will say this: If Holland decides keep Sammy, Cola/White around for another season I will be calling for his retirement. These panic signings have to be cut out with amnesty buyouts. If they are on next year's starting roster ahead of a few kids I think Holland will have gone mental.
  2. dirtydangles

    Nyquist, Tatar, dekeyser

    I don't think we will. Babs said he isn't just giving him a game unless he thinks the kid gives them a chance to win. No offence but how has DD shown he can be an improvement over our defense yet? This blows for DD because we are trying to squeak into the playoffs and can't really afford to have him fail if he does get a sniff.
  3. dirtydangles

    Holland retirement watch?

    For the sake of everyone's sanity - I hope so.
  4. dirtydangles

    Holland retirement watch?

    Well I would imagine that Holland has the last word. If Nill was always second guessing everything Holland proposed he probably wouldn't be around anymore so I imagine he has his own ideas but hasn't had his chance to run the show.
  5. dirtydangles

    Holland retirement watch?

    I woulnd't be upset... This isn't a knee jerk reaction. I think this organization needs a bit of a shake-up at some point. We also need a shift in outlook in my opinion.
  6. dirtydangles

    Ryan Sproul to play with the Griffins for the rest of the year

    Absolutely not. He needs at least one full season in GR before getting even a call-up. 2 full seasons before anything full-time.
  7. dirtydangles

    time to trade filppula?

    love to see holland get a nice package back to make feaster look like a clown
  8. dirtydangles

    Ryan Sproul to play with the Griffins for the rest of the year

    Nice to hear. Love Sproul and I'll watch him closely in GR.
  9. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    I don't consider the 26 year old goalie prospect they got in the trade to be of great value... Feaster is delusional.
  10. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    I'm not surprised. Feaster is the kind of GM that would be blind or at least ignorant to the potential of other team's prospects. All he sees is "2nd round pick" and thinks the deal is worse than the one offered by the Blues. Realistically I bet Holland included prospects far better than the two in that Blues package. Feaster doesn't see that his future 1st rounder is further away from making it in the nhl than an experienced prospect is. He could have asked for Rattie + 2nd, 3rd and it would have been a better deal in my opinion.
  11. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    I think it is important that we don't swing too hard towards youth. Look at Edmonton for example. We need some guys in their prime mixed in with the youth. I also think that it is possible to have too many prospects in the cupboard where not all will be given the chance to succeed. If Kindl had competition this year he probably wouldn't be one of our top guys right now. Eriksson is 27/28 and fits nicely in with the current core and will still be around when the youth hits. I don't mind losing a few picks here and there considering what we already have.
  12. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    Well thanks for not calling me an idiot lol . but ya, I'd consider flip but he would have to be re-signed and he doesn't really match the re-build for dallas because he is 29 already. ouellet is more in line with what they are interested in. A top prospect at F, D and a 1st, 2nd is pretty good.
  13. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    1st (2013), 2nd (2014), Nyquist, Ouellet for Eriksson 1st, Nyquist, Quincey for Gaborik
  14. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    well ya (me too), but at what price? I think Gabby is more realistic due to his age and the fact that he isn't on the most friendly contract right now. eriksson would be quite expensive but worth it
  15. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    Gaborik or Eriksson would restore my faith in Holland.
  16. dirtydangles

    Stars trade Jaromir Jagr to Bruins

    I have the exact same feelings.
  17. dirtydangles

    Holland: "We don't need depth...Need a top guy"

    How are people not falling out of their chairs??? This was classic!
  18. dirtydangles

    Bouwmeester to Blues

    holding out hope for yandle.... or something better.
  19. dirtydangles

    Datsyuk Leaving?!

  20. dirtydangles

    Bouwmeester to Blues

    A 26 year old goalie who won't be a factor by coming to N.A. likely? We could have gone with McCollum as a throw in. Paterson would have been an option. Blues didn't give up Allen (who is their top goalie prospect).
  21. dirtydangles

    Bouwmeester to Blues

    I love how CGY fans on HF were claiming that Jurco, Quincey, 2nd wouldn't have done it. most said nyquist + 1st wasn't enough I almost feel bad for the fans
  22. dirtydangles

    Bouwmeester to Blues

    Reto Berra a Swiss goalie, never played in N.America,. Mark Cundari, a small, undrafted, 22-YO D-man, 3 years in AHL
  23. dirtydangles

    Bouwmeester to Blues

    id be more concerned if we were in the same division next year
  24. dirtydangles

    Bouwmeester to Blues

    We could have offered more but without the 1st rounder. He gets 1st round value and then a couple throw-in prospects. Feaster has no clue.
  25. dirtydangles

    with trade deadline approaching - who's our tradeable assets?

    Ya I don't see what leverage he has. Jarnkrok will replace him if he holds out and gets traded.