rrasco

Murph's daughter did one last year too.

So I was looking for a map of the the proposed realignment conferences to see how things lined up geographically, and while I found one on a random ass blog that had nothing to do with hockey, I also ran across this and all the different scenarios about made my head explode. Figured some of you would like to see these possible scenarios, albeit somewhat extravagant (contraction, expansion, relocation, etc...you'll see). http://www.tomfulery.com/nhl-realignment-maps/

I see posts occasionally and get a good chuckle too. I am like, who is this clo.....oh.....

Except Eva

That's awesome. What's scary is Jordan Eberle and Justin Schultz are still in the top 10 (Eberle was in 1st) and they only played 34 games. Funny to see Kris Newbury on there too.

Those are actually two different things. An illegal line change to start a fight, or join one, is 10-game automatic. A legal line change with the intent of starting an altercation is subject to SD.

I don't remember who used the term, but when I saw this weekend they were referencing his hearing was for 'coming off the bench with the intent to start an altercation'. Not for an illegal line change, but legally with the intent to start an altercation. If you go back a year or so, same thing Jean-Francois Jacques was suspended for when he was with the Ducks.

Hell yes. Great! That one was good. I was thinking to myself, why don't all our D do that more often?

What a waist of web space. I am not really being serious, I'm making fun of you. Thanks.

No pets? Did you guys scream like a bunch of little girls and break it with your vocal resonance? Appears to be a gaming keyboard.

This just popped up after another video I was watching. I thought it was hilarious.

Yes. I for one am loving all this hockey. LGRW!

Everyone had a good game. Stellar performance by Jimmy. Good win, now get ready for tomorrow.

Great hit, better goal. EDIT: Ha, I'm watching that compilation video and didn't realize this one was in there.

I can't stop watching it. That's the funniest s*** I've seen in a looong time.

Sad we are in a must win situation at this point. Let's just say, they MUST WIN THIS GAME.

Why? Doesn't hurt to have an extra body in GR. This literally doesn't affect us in any way shape of form.

It was a dirty hit. I'm pretty sure Clowe jumped off the bench after it too. Not sure if a line change was actually going on or not.

Here's to another 1000 useless posts!

What are everyone's thoughts on this kneeing major? I'm not really sure I like it being called a kneeing major, but that's because he didn't throw his leg out there like the typical kneeing calls you see (see: Laraque on Kronwall). He kind of led with his knee, but I didn't see him throw it out there. Looked like he was going for a hard body check.

About 20 minutes Jan will be in the A.

At this point, I believe he is the only forward close to coming back. Sammy is out for a few weeks with his finger. Mule is out until at least Wednesday. Bert's back sounded like it was bad and there has been nothing new to say about him lately. It was just a guess based on the information available to me. With the gluten of injured forwards, why rush to get rid of a roster spot until someone is coming back? They throw in Eaves, what if someone can't go? Who's in the press box?

That's what I've been trying to figure out. We have 3 options: 1. Trade coming 2. Call-up from GR 3. Helm is coming back

Makes sense. FWIW, I think he committed to that hit anticipating cal--btw, is that your real name--clutterbuck was going to control the puck and the slow motion really gives you a false sense of how long he had to decide that. Watch the first replay of the NHL video, it was real quick. At any rate, I wasn't aware that leading with your knee was that dangerous of a play, I guess because you don't see it as often and I unfortunately don't actually play hockey so I don't have that on-ice feel for how reckless that play actually is.