Neomaxizoomdweebie

Member
  • Content Count

    6,997
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Everything posted by Neomaxizoomdweebie

  1. Different guys: Puppa Krupa
  2. Yep. And AA would be a -1
  3. I would be happy about it cuz it would mean that the Wings won the game. Which apparently no one else wants, but me.
  4. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    News From Around the NHL *Mod warning page 75*

    https://www.nhl.com/redwings/news/red-wings-recall-defenseman-brian-lashoff/c-305820554
  5. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    2018 Prospects Watch

    Meh. They're both busts like that Zagina guy.
  6. Except for the fact that they've only been in the league for 2 years and they shouldn't get to win a cup until after they've gone thru a rebuild or expansion losing phase like everyone else.
  7. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Who will score more goals to end the season, Larkin or AA?

    Sounds more like a Seth Green role.
  8. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Blashill expected back next season...

  9. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Looks like we have a goalie next year

    WE DID
  10. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Looks like we have a goalie next year

    WE DID
  11. Its the thread title. No one gets it, but they feel like they should.
  12. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Who will score more goals to end the season, Larkin or AA?

    Imagine what the haul would have been for Mrazek if he was traded 2 years earlier than he was. Not comparing AA's talent to Mrazeks, but if you believe he's not a long term threat, you have to look at moving him for help on D while he's at his highest value. I just don't seem him as a top 6 scoring threat long term, and I don't want to see Holland lock him into a long term contract because of it. The other kids look more like long term solutions, which is why AA is the odd man out for me.
  13. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Who will score more goals to end the season, Larkin or AA?

    Agreed. AA has the smallest window. They need to trade him while his value is at its highest. My concern is that Holland signs him to an Abby like contract and we're stuck with him after he ceases to be a scoring threat.
  14. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Looks like we have a goalie next year

    What difference dies it make tho? Its a one yr deal and we arent making the playoffs next season. His contract isnt hurting the team at all in cap terms, so how is it a waste of money? The Wings had no starting goalie for next season and they just signed a 2 time NHL All Star veteran goaltender to a 1 year deal at 4 mil. With no NTC. I just cant find anyway to hate this deal unless u just hate Howard and that's your only reason.
  15. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Looks like we have a goalie next year

    Does that mean my wife is a good goalie?
  16. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    3/19 Tuesday GDT - Red Wings @ Rangers - 7:00 PM ET

    Sall good we have Witkowski
  17. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Looks like we have a goalie next year

    Goalie drafting and development just isnt a priority anymore. There are only a few elite guys anymore, but a lot of really good ones. That can be gotten via free agency. Please explain how this is bad. We dont have a starting goalie without signing one. Howard on a short-term, cheap deal seems like a win. What am I missing?
  18. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    3/14 Conductor GDT - Lightning @ Red Wings - 7:30 PM ET

    I thought they were trophies. Its super convenient. Plausible deniability.
  19. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    Who will score more goals to end the season, Larkin or AA?

    Actually they could do everything you've posted with those contracts. Not crippling.
  20. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    3/14 Conductor GDT - Lightning @ Red Wings - 7:30 PM ET

    IDK. I dont remember what I've said most of the time.
  21. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    3/19 Tuesday GDT - Red Wings @ Rangers - 7:00 PM ET

    What do u have against Swedes?
  22. Neomaxizoomdweebie

    2019 Draft

    You never go Kane. Never.