Neomaxizoomdweebie

I've never bought into the "build from the net out" approach. There are always scenarios where a team has a bona fide starter, with a kid nipping at his heels and they need to trade one. Get one that way. I'm more of a fill the 2 hardest positions first (1C and 1D) and fill out your top 6 F and top 4 D from there. Goalies can't score, necessitating some really good skaters. But skaters can play stellar defense, making a need for an elite G null. That's why I don't go after a G in the early 1st round. If I have 2 first rounders? Maybe. If I'm a good team drafting in the second half of the 1st and I already have a solid team of F and D, then yes. But we don't have either of those 2 scenarios.

I find it sad how all of these guys who couldnt last in the NHL are jumping on the bandwagon to ruin the careers of others and relishing in their misery.

I know. Cute nicknames? Guiness the Menace The Mickey D's

How about CRLs MS paint skills?

Too big of a risk. I would never take a goalie that high. It's the most difficult position to forecast. Too much bust potential This could be the highest pick we have since Yzerman. I would go with one of the F if I am picking that high. I dont think that about Y either. If his plan is to play him, than ok. But you cant keep that many goalies on ur roster at once. Someone will have to be waived at some point. Losing any of them for nothing would be a mistake IMO which is potentially what this deal could do.

If it was for a player who is going to stay, ok. But if Comrie gets picked up on waivers, then you gave up an asset (even a cheap one) for nothing. I would rather stockpile D than goalies. D can be shuffled around between Toledo and GR. You only have 6 goalie spots. If you needed to fill a spot in GR, then bring up Nagle or Fulcher and sign a nobody goalie to a temp contract in Toledo. I liked the Perlini trade. And even tho this one is pretty much inconsequential, I just dont see the point.

They dress 8 D in the K?

I don't think that drafting an elite player at 4th overall makes you a genius. A monkey can do that. Sack-itch still sucks.

Our next win will be at the draft lottery.

They just got another one. Our D is worse than Harbaugh's.

I heard the Walgreens by LCA keeps running out of Prilosec.

Agreed. Wings could lose Comrie on waivers which means they traded Ville for nothing.

Guessing they gave up Saarijarvi

Bring a buddy. Put him in a wheelchair wearing a Moore Jersey.

Someone-Seider Nobody-Somebody Anybody-Anyone Looks better at this point.

Just wear your McCarty jersey and you should be fine. Or better yet, Bertuzzi

Both

This was a work of art. Well done. Off topic...does anyone else see a left areola?

I really truly believe that Blash is to the point of throwing s**t against the wall to see what sticks. I really do. He's desperate. He doesn't have any ideas left and the team knows it. That's what I'm seeing. You can't keep a coach around at that point. At this point, I would rather they just make Carley Johnston the Head Coach. You don't even have to film the game. Just keep the camera aimed at the bench the whole time. People would rather watch that. Let it rain likes.

I thought Tom Hanks was playing Mr. Rogers? When did Pacino get the role? Blashill

How I feel as a Wings fan. So many metaphors here.

They cant be "new" believers if they left when things were going bad. They'd be jumping back on the bandwagon.

I wonder if Riley Sheahan has started a "Did the Wings score" page somewhere?

I think the last few seasons have proven to me that a lot of Wings fans were, in fact, fairweather fans. The number of hardcore fans turned out to be far less than I thought. Many of whom used to post in here. I think many will come back when the team is good again, but will they be welcomed?

Winner.